Hoffman W D, Danner R L, Quezado Z M, Banks S M, Elin R J, Hosseini J M, Natanson C
Critical Care Medicine Department, Warren G. Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Infect Immun. 1996 Feb;64(2):406-12. doi: 10.1128/iai.64.2.406-412.1996.
We investigated whether the severity of septic shock is determined by virulence factors associated with or the levels of endotoxemia produced by two Escherichia coli strains. Canines were challenged intraperitoneally with an E. coli strain (O6:H1:K2) that has virulence factors associated with human disease or with an equal dose of a nonvirulent strain (O86:H8) that lacks these factors. Both strains were administered in viable, heat-killed, and purified endotoxin forms. Median survival times with the virulent strain compared with the nonvirulent strain were shorter with viable bacteria (5 x 10(10) CFU/kg) (144 h versus > 672 h; Wilcoxon, P = 0.03), longer with heat-killed bacteria (5 x 10(9) CFU/kg) ( > 676 h versus 26 h; P = 0.03), and similar with purified endotoxin (15 mg/kg) (28 h versus 48 h; P = 0.71). However, whether the challenge contained viable bacteria, heat-killed bacteria, or purified endotoxin, the virulent strain produced less endotoxemia (P = 0.001). Hence, the changing outcomes with differing forms of the two strains cannot be attributed solely to endotoxin levels. The viable virulent strain caused less endotoxemia but more harm, and this does not appear to be explained by a more potent endotoxin or other heat-stable component. This study suggests that circulating endotoxin levels per se are less important in the outcome of septic shock than virulence factors associated with E. coli strains. Furthermore, the data call into question the significance of the endotoxin concentration in the blood in predicting the severity of shock and the lethality of gram-negative infections.
我们研究了败血症性休克的严重程度是否由与两种大肠杆菌菌株相关的毒力因子或其产生的内毒素血症水平所决定。将犬经腹腔注射具有与人疾病相关毒力因子的大肠杆菌菌株(O6:H1:K2)或同等剂量缺乏这些因子的无毒菌株(O86:H8)。两种菌株均以活的、热灭活的和纯化内毒素形式给药。与无毒菌株相比,活细菌(5×10¹⁰CFU/kg)感染时,有毒力菌株的中位生存时间较短(144小时对>672小时;Wilcoxon检验,P = 0.03),热灭活细菌(5×10⁹CFU/kg)感染时较长(>676小时对26小时;P = 0.03),纯化内毒素(15mg/kg)感染时相似(28小时对48小时;P = 0.71)。然而,无论攻击物包含活细菌、热灭活细菌还是纯化内毒素,有毒力菌株产生的内毒素血症较少(P = 0.001)。因此,两种菌株不同形式导致的不同结果不能仅归因于内毒素水平。活的有毒力菌株引起的内毒素血症较少但危害更大,这似乎不能用更强效的内毒素或其他热稳定成分来解释。本研究表明,在败血症性休克的结果中,循环内毒素水平本身比与大肠杆菌菌株相关的毒力因子的重要性要低。此外,这些数据质疑了血液中内毒素浓度在预测休克严重程度和革兰氏阴性菌感染致死率方面的意义。