Tsevat J, Solzan J G, Kuntz K M, Ragland J, Currier J S, Sell R L, Weinstein M C
Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Med Care. 1996 Jan;34(1):44-57. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199601000-00004.
To assess the health values of patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and examine the relationships between their health values and health status at two points in time, the authors sought to determine whether patients' physical and mental health statuses were good predictors of how they valued their current state of health. One hundred thirty-nine patients with various stages of HIV infection were interviewed in a prospective cohort study based in a primary care practice of a community-based teaching hospital. Patients were interviewed twice at 6-month intervals using three health value measures--the time trade off, rating scale, and Quality of Well-being Scale--and three health status measures: the 18-item Mental Health Inventory, the Dyspnea-Fatigue Index, and the Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 Health Survey. The health status of HIV-infected patients was compromised and, with the exception of mental health, generally was worse among patients with more advanced HIV-infection. Rating scale and Quality of Well-being Scale scores were related inversely to disease stage, but time-trade off scores generally were higher regardless of disease stage. Health value measures showed moderate relationships with measures of physical functioning (r = 0.34-0.68) but only a fair relationship with mental health (r = 0.00-0.48). The health status of HIV-infected patients who remained asymptomatic or remained symptomatic but without developing acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) changed little over 6 months, whereas the health status of patients with AIDS and of patients manifesting progression of HIV-infection deteriorated over time. In contrast, health values, particularly time-tradeoff scores, remained stable even in the face of changes in health status and disease progression. With the exception of mental health, the impact of HIV infection on health status tends to parallel the clinical stage of disease. Health values of HIV-infected patients, however, generally are high and correlate better with physical functioning than with mental health.
为评估感染人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)患者的健康价值观,并考察两个时间点上其健康价值观与健康状况之间的关系,作者试图确定患者的身心健康状况能否很好地预测他们对自身当前健康状态的评价。在一家社区教学医院的初级保健机构开展的一项前瞻性队列研究中,对139例处于HIV感染不同阶段的患者进行了访谈。患者每隔6个月接受两次访谈,采用三种健康价值观测量方法——时间权衡法、评分量表和幸福感量表,以及三种健康状况测量方法:18项心理健康量表、呼吸困难-疲劳指数和医学结局研究简版36健康调查。HIV感染患者的健康状况受到损害,除心理健康外,HIV感染程度较严重的患者总体健康状况通常更差。评分量表和幸福感量表得分与疾病阶段呈负相关,但时间权衡法得分无论疾病阶段通常都较高。健康价值观测量方法与身体功能测量方法显示出中度相关性(r = 0.34 - 0.68),但与心理健康仅呈一般相关性(r = 0.00 - 0.48)。仍无症状或有症状但未发展为获得性免疫缺陷综合征(AIDS)的HIV感染患者的健康状况在6个月内变化不大,而患有AIDS的患者以及HIV感染病情进展的患者的健康状况随时间恶化。相比之下,即使面对健康状况和疾病进展的变化,健康价值观,尤其是时间权衡法得分,仍保持稳定。除心理健康外,HIV感染对健康状况的影响往往与疾病的临床阶段平行。然而,HIV感染患者的健康价值观总体较高,与身体功能的相关性优于与心理健康的相关性。