• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用更新的个体患者数据进行Meta分析(综述)的实用方法。Cochrane工作组。

Practical methodology of meta-analyses (overviews) using updated individual patient data. Cochrane Working Group.

作者信息

Stewart L A, Clarke M J

机构信息

MRC Cancer Trials Office, Cambridge, U.K.

出版信息

Stat Med. 1995 Oct 15;14(19):2057-79. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780141902.

DOI:10.1002/sim.4780141902
PMID:8552887
Abstract

Meta-analyses using updated individual patient data may provide the most reliable means of combining data from similar randomized controlled trials. The benefits of this approach to systematic reviews are described. Guidance, based on the experience of several groups who have undertaken such projects, is given. This includes practical advice on initiating and maintaining collaboration, the time and resources required to undertake these usually international projects and methods of data checking and validation. Example proforma are included.

摘要

使用更新后的个体患者数据进行的荟萃分析可能提供整合来自相似随机对照试验数据的最可靠方法。描述了这种方法对系统评价的益处。基于多个开展此类项目的团队的经验给出了指导意见。这包括关于启动和维持合作的实用建议、开展这些通常为国际性项目所需的时间和资源,以及数据检查和验证方法。文中包含示例表格。

相似文献

1
Practical methodology of meta-analyses (overviews) using updated individual patient data. Cochrane Working Group.使用更新的个体患者数据进行Meta分析(综述)的实用方法。Cochrane工作组。
Stat Med. 1995 Oct 15;14(19):2057-79. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780141902.
2
Meta-analyses using individual patient data.使用个体患者数据的荟萃分析。
J Eval Clin Pract. 1997 Aug;3(3):207-12. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.1997.00005.x.
3
To IPD or not to IPD? Advantages and disadvantages of systematic reviews using individual patient data.是否采用个体患者数据的系统评价?使用个体患者数据进行系统评价的利弊。
Eval Health Prof. 2002 Mar;25(1):76-97. doi: 10.1177/0163278702025001006.
4
Collaborative worldwide overviews of randomized trials.全球随机试验协作综述。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993 Dec 31;703:149-54; discussion 154-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26344.x.
5
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.基于证据的医学、系统评价以及介入性疼痛管理指南:第6部分。观察性研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Pain Physician. 2009 Sep-Oct;12(5):819-50.
6
How to write a Cochrane systematic review.如何撰写 Cochrane 系统评价
Nephrology (Carlton). 2010 Sep;15(6):617-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2010.01380.x.
7
[The Cochrane Collaboration: the present and the future].[考科蓝协作网:现状与未来]
Nihon Rinsho. 2001 Feb;59(2):381-90.
8
[The Cochrane collaboration. Invitation for cooperation].[考科蓝协作网。合作邀请]
Przegl Lek. 1994;51(8):367-8.
9
[Value of the Cochrane Collaboration: the point of view of meta-analysis practitioner].[Cochrane协作网的价值:荟萃分析从业者的视角]
Therapie. 1996 May-Jun;51(3):257-60.
10
Reporting and handling missing outcome data in mental health: a systematic review of Cochrane systematic reviews and meta-analyses.报告和处理心理健康中缺失结局数据:Cochrane 系统评价和荟萃分析的系统评价。
Res Synth Methods. 2015 Jun;6(2):175-87. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1131. Epub 2015 Jan 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction model developed on the basis of meta-analysis in the field of medicine: a systematic survey and methodological summaries.基于医学领域荟萃分析开发的预测模型:系统综述与方法总结。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Aug 9;25(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02639-6.
2
Prognostic factors associated with recurrence in patients undergoing surgery for hepatic cystic echinococcosis: A systematic review protocol.肝囊性棘球蚴病手术患者复发相关的预后因素:一项系统评价方案
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 6;20(8):e0329235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329235. eCollection 2025.
3
High-dose docosahexaenoic acid for bronchopulmonary dysplasia severity in very preterm infants: a collaborative individual participant data meta-analysis.
高剂量二十二碳六烯酸对极早产儿支气管肺发育不良严重程度的影响:一项合作的个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2025 Apr;121(4):826-834. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.01.004. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
4
Genome-Wide Association Study to Identify Genetic Variants Associated With Diabetic Maculopathy.全基因组关联研究以鉴定与糖尿病性黄斑病变相关的基因变异
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2025 Mar 3;66(3):55. doi: 10.1167/iovs.66.3.55.
5
Annual versus biannual azithromycin mass drug administration for the elimination of infectious trachoma in Africa: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis using data from individual communities.非洲地区使用阿奇霉素进行年度与半年一次群体给药以消除感染性沙眼:利用来自各个社区的数据进行系统评价和荟萃分析的方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 6;15(2):e087170. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087170.
6
Indirect Treatment Comparisons in Healthcare Decision Making: A Targeted Review of Regulatory Approval, Reimbursement, and Pricing Recommendations Globally for Oncology Drugs in 2021-2023.医疗决策中的间接治疗比较:2021 - 2023年全球肿瘤药物监管批准、报销和定价建议的针对性综述
Adv Ther. 2025 Jan;42(1):52-69. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-03013-6. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
7
Teachers' judgment accuracy: A replication check by psychometric meta-analysis.教师判断准确性的心理测量元分析再检验。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 25;19(7):e0307594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307594. eCollection 2024.
8
Nine quick tips for open meta-analyses.九条开放元分析的快速提示。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Jul 25;20(7):e1012252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012252. eCollection 2024 Jul.
9
Application of causal inference methods in individual-participant data meta-analyses in medicine: addressing data handling and reporting gaps with new proposed reporting guidelines.因果推理方法在医学个体参与者数据荟萃分析中的应用:通过新提出的报告指南解决数据处理和报告差距。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Apr 19;24(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02210-9.
10
Navigating data standards in public health: A brief report from a data-standards meeting.公共卫生领域的数据标准导航:数据标准会议简要报告
J Glob Health. 2024 Apr 5;14:03024. doi: 10.7189/jogh.14.03024.