Goldman J, Sorensen E, Ward M
Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, JHMHC, University of Florida, Gainesville 32610, USA.
Community Ment Health J. 1995 Oct;31(5):437-48. doi: 10.1007/BF02188614.
A brief battery of self-report measures was constructed to discriminate effectively 45 matched clinic versus nonclinic subjects, ages 8 to 15. The battery consisted of measures from six domains, including externalizing problems, child and parent report of internalizing problems, peer relations, school functioning, and family relationships. Data on subjects and their families were provided by various sources, including parents, teachers, and the children. In an effort to facilitate interpretation and use of this information by unsophisticated staff, within domain scores were converted to bivariate risk scores. Results indicated effective classification (82%) of groups using the bivariate risk scores alone. This constituted only a small loss of information when the risk scores replaced t-scores. Implications for the use of the risk scores to facilitate treatment planning and program evaluation are discussed.
构建了一套简短的自我报告测量方法，以有效区分45名年龄在8至15岁之间相匹配的临床组与非临床组受试者。该套测量方法包括来自六个领域的测量指标，包括外化问题、儿童和家长报告的内化问题、同伴关系、学校功能和家庭关系。关于受试者及其家庭的数据由包括家长、教师和儿童在内的各种来源提供。为了便于不太专业的工作人员解释和使用这些信息，将领域内得分转换为双变量风险得分。结果表明，仅使用双变量风险得分就能有效区分两组（82%）。当风险得分取代t分数时，这只造成了少量信息损失。讨论了使用风险得分促进治疗计划和项目评估的意义。
