• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用疾病控制与预防中心儿童铅中毒风险调查问卷预测孕妇血铅水平升高情况。

Use of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention childhood lead poisoning risk questionnaire to predict blood lead elevations in pregnant women.

作者信息

Stefanak M A, Bourguet C C, Benzies-Styka T

机构信息

Mahoning County General Health District Board of Health, Youngstown, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Feb;87(2):209-12. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00397-5.

DOI:10.1016/0029-7844(95)00397-5
PMID:8559525
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the accuracy of a questionnaire developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), given to pregnant women for identification of children at risk for lead poisoning.

METHODS

The study population consisted of all 314 new prenatal patients enrolled in health department clinics in 1990-1992. Lead was measured in venous blood, and patients completed written questionnaires to gather information about lead exposure risk factors. The relationship between elevated maternal blood lead levels (at or greater than 10 micrograms/dL or 0.483 mumol/L) and responses to the CDC questionnaire and other questions were examined using chi 2 statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Two hundred ninety-nine women provided responses to questions about lead exposure risk. Thirty-nine women (13%) had elevated blood lead levels. A woman with a positive response to at least one CDC question was more likely to have elevated blood lead than a woman who answered negatively to all four CDC questions (relative risk = 2.39, 95% confidence interval 1.17-4.89; P = .01). Using the CDC definition of high risk ("yes" to at least one question), the questionnaire had a sensitivity of 75.7% and a negative predictive value of 93.1%. A questionnaire that combined housing conditions, smoking status, and high consumption of canned foods had a sensitivity of 89.2% and a negative predictive value of 96.4%. A high prevalence of elevated blood lead in children living with women with elevated blood lead was observed.

CONCLUSION

Querying pregnant women about risk factors for lead exposure can aid in assessing prenatal lead exposure risk. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of the CDC questionnaire, when used with high-risk women, are comparable to its reported accuracy in young children.

摘要

目的

评估美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)编制的一份问卷在识别有铅中毒风险儿童方面的准确性,该问卷发放给了孕妇。

方法

研究对象包括1990 - 1992年在卫生部门诊所登记的所有314名新的产前患者。检测静脉血中的铅含量,并让患者填写书面问卷以收集有关铅暴露风险因素的信息。使用卡方统计分析来研究孕妇血铅水平升高(达到或高于10微克/分升或0.483微摩尔/升)与对CDC问卷及其他问题的回答之间的关系。

结果

299名女性回答了有关铅暴露风险的问题。39名女性(13%)血铅水平升高。对至少一个CDC问题回答为阳性的女性比所有四个CDC问题回答均为阴性的女性更有可能血铅水平升高(相对风险 = 2.39,95%置信区间1.17 - 4.89;P = 0.01)。根据CDC的高风险定义(至少一个问题回答“是”),该问卷的灵敏度为75.7%,阴性预测值为93.1%。一份综合了住房条件、吸烟状况和罐装食品高消费量的问卷,灵敏度为89.2%,阴性预测值为96.4%。观察到与血铅水平升高的女性生活在一起的儿童中血铅水平升高的患病率较高。

结论

询问孕妇铅暴露风险因素有助于评估产前铅暴露风险。CDC问卷在用于高危女性时的灵敏度和阴性预测值与报告的在幼儿中的准确性相当。

相似文献

1
Use of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention childhood lead poisoning risk questionnaire to predict blood lead elevations in pregnant women.使用疾病控制与预防中心儿童铅中毒风险调查问卷预测孕妇血铅水平升高情况。
Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Feb;87(2):209-12. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00397-5.
2
Is there lead in the suburbs? Risk assessment in Chicago suburban pediatric practices. Pediatric Practice Research Group.郊区有铅污染吗?芝加哥郊区儿科诊所的风险评估。儿科实践研究小组。
Pediatrics. 1994 Feb;93(2):164-71.
3
Lead poisoning risk determination in a rural setting.农村地区铅中毒风险判定
Pediatrics. 1996 Jan;97(1):84-90.
4
Lead poisoning risk determination in an urban population through the use of a standardized questionnaire.通过使用标准化问卷确定城市人口中的铅中毒风险
Pediatrics. 1994 Feb;93(2):159-63.
5
Do questions about lead exposure predict elevated lead levels?关于铅暴露的问题能否预测铅水平升高?
Pediatrics. 1994 Feb;93(2):192-4.
6
Development of a population-specific risk assessment to predict elevated blood lead levels in Santa Clara County, California.开发一种针对特定人群的风险评估方法,以预测加利福尼亚州圣克拉拉县血铅水平升高的情况。
Pediatrics. 1995 Oct;96(4 Pt 1):643-8.
7
The failure of CDC screening questionnaire to efficiently detect elevated lead levels in a rural population of children.美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的筛查问卷未能有效检测出农村儿童群体中升高的铅水平。
J Fam Pract. 1997 Dec;45(6):515-8.
8
Identification of children at risk for lead poisoning: an evaluation of routine pediatric blood lead screening in an HMO-insured population.识别有铅中毒风险的儿童:对健康维护组织(HMO)参保人群中常规儿科血铅筛查的评估。
Pediatrics. 1996 Jan;97(1):79-83.
9
Use of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention childhood lead poisoning risk questionnaire to predict blood lead elevations in pregnant women.使用疾病控制与预防中心儿童铅中毒风险调查问卷预测孕妇血铅水平升高情况。
Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jul;88(1):159-60. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)88088-4.
10
Prevalence of lead poisoning in a suburban practice.郊区诊所中铅中毒的患病率。
J Fam Pract. 1995 Jul;41(1):65-71.

引用本文的文献

1
Universal Lead Testing in Pregnancy: A Call to Action.孕期普遍铅检测:行动呼吁
Pediatrics. 2024 Oct 1;154(Suppl 2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2024-067808I.
2
Risk-Factor Based Lead Screening and Correlation with Blood Lead Levels in Pregnancy.基于风险因素的妊娠铅筛查与血铅水平的相关性。
Matern Child Health J. 2022 Jan;26(1):185-192. doi: 10.1007/s10995-021-03325-x. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
3
Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction of lead(II) as 5-(4-dimethylaminobenzylidene) rhodanine chelates from food and water samples.从食品和水样中以5-(4-二甲基氨基亚苄基)罗丹宁螯合物形式分散液液微萃取铅(II)
Environ Monit Assess. 2015 Feb;187(2):9. doi: 10.1007/s10661-014-4160-4. Epub 2015 Jan 25.
4
Sources of potential lead exposure among pregnant women in New Mexico.新墨西哥州孕妇潜在铅暴露源。
Matern Child Health J. 2013 Jan;17(1):172-9. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-0963-5.
5
Inadequate prenatal care and elevated blood lead levels among children born in Providence, Rhode Island: a population-based study.罗德岛普罗维登斯市出生儿童的产前护理不足与血铅水平升高:一项基于人群的研究。
Public Health Rep. 2006 Nov-Dec;121(6):729-36. doi: 10.1177/003335490612100613.