• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理、身体和精神幸福感量表的编制与心理测量学验证

Development and psychometric validation of the Mental, Physical, and Spiritual Well-Being Scale.

作者信息

Vella-Brodrick D A, Allen F C

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Psychol Rep. 1995 Oct;77(2):659-74. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1995.77.2.659.

DOI:10.2466/pr0.1995.77.2.659
PMID:8559898
Abstract

Due to the growing interest in holistic health and well-being, the Mental, Physical, and Spiritual Well-being Scale was developed. This well-being scale has 30 items and incorporates mental, physical, and spiritual subscales. An initial set of items was developed and 186 university students responded to these. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted using principal components analysis with varimax rotation (N=100) to reduce the number of items in the scale. Three factors were extracted based on the eigenvalues, loading coefficients exceeding 0.3, and the screen test. Ten items from each of the three factors were selected, reducing the number of items from 66 to 30. Another factor analysis, performed on 129 employees of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation and 229 students from Monash University, indicated three factors were representative of the mental, physical, and spiritual subscales. Test-retest reliabilities over 1 mo. ranged from 0.87 to 0.97 for the three subscales whilst internal consistency ranged from 0.75 to 0.85. Concurrent validity was examined using the General Health Questionnaire and the Spiritual Well-being Scale. The discriminant validity of the MPS was also explored using three activity groups nominated as highly physical (weight training) or highly mental (chess) or highly spiritual (prayer). Out of a total of 88 cases, 77.3% of these were correctly classified into their actual activity group based on their scores. Sample sizes were moderate and testing was of limited samples. More psychometric work is needed but preliminary findings indicate an accurate and reliable test.

摘要

由于人们对整体健康和幸福的兴趣日益浓厚,因此开发了心理、身体和精神幸福感量表。该幸福感量表有30个项目,包括心理、身体和精神三个分量表。最初开发了一组项目,186名大学生对这些项目进行了回应。使用主成分分析和方差最大化旋转(N = 100)进行探索性因素分析,以减少量表中的项目数量。根据特征值、负荷系数超过0.3以及碎石图检验提取了三个因素。从这三个因素中各选出10个项目,将项目数量从66个减少到30个。对英联邦科学与工业研究组织的129名员工和莫纳什大学的229名学生进行的另一项因素分析表明,有三个因素代表了心理、身体和精神分量表。三个分量表在1个月内的重测信度在0.87至0.97之间,而内部一致性在0.75至0.85之间。使用一般健康问卷和精神幸福感量表检验了同时效度。还使用被指定为高度体力活动(举重训练)、高度脑力活动(国际象棋)或高度精神活动(祈祷)的三个活动组来探索MPS的区分效度。在总共88个案例中,其中77.3%根据其分数被正确分类到实际活动组中。样本量适中且测试样本有限。需要更多的心理测量工作,但初步结果表明该测试准确可靠。

相似文献

1
Development and psychometric validation of the Mental, Physical, and Spiritual Well-Being Scale.心理、身体和精神幸福感量表的编制与心理测量学验证
Psychol Rep. 1995 Oct;77(2):659-74. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1995.77.2.659.
2
Development of a social inclusion index to capture subjective and objective life domains (Phase II): psychometric development study.发展一个社会包容指数来捕捉主观和客观的生活领域(第二阶段):心理测量发展研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(1):iii-vii, ix-xii, -1-241. doi: 10.3310/hta16010.
3
[Factorial analysis and internal consistency of the French version of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS 20), in obese women].[肥胖女性中多伦多述情障碍量表(TAS 20)法语版的因子分析与内部一致性]
Encephale. 2002 Jul-Aug;28(4):277-82.
4
Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-Somatic, Anxiety, and Depressive Symptoms.土耳其版患者健康问卷躯体、焦虑和抑郁症状的心理测量特性。
Compr Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;53(5):623-9. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
5
Response set of social desirability in relation to the Mental, Physical and Spiritual Well-Being Scale.与心理、身体和精神幸福感量表相关的社会期望反应定势。
Psychol Rep. 1997 Aug;81(1):127-30. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1997.81.1.127.
6
The Self-Perception and Relationships Tool (S-PRT): a novel approach to the measurement of subjective health-related quality of life.自我认知与人际关系工具(S-PRT):一种测量主观健康相关生活质量的新方法。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 Jul 16;2:36. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-36.
7
A brief spiritual beliefs inventory for use in quality of life research in life-threatening illness.一份用于危及生命疾病生活质量研究的简短精神信仰量表。
Psychooncology. 1998 Nov-Dec;7(6):460-9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(199811/12)7:6<460::AID-PON328>3.0.CO;2-R.
8
[Development and validation of a perceived stress questionnaire recommended as a follow-up indicator in occupational medicine].[作为职业医学随访指标的感知压力问卷的开发与验证]
Encephale. 1997 May-Jun;23(3):184-93.
9
Reliability of the Ego-Grasping Scale.自我把握量表的信度
Psychol Rep. 2012 Apr;110(2):378-82. doi: 10.2466/02.07.17.PR0.110.2.378-382.
10
Development and validation of questionnaire measuring attitudes towards sexual health among university students.大学生性健康态度调查问卷的编制与验证
Croat Med J. 2005 Feb;46(1):52-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Validity Evidence and Reliability of a Subjective Well-Being Scale: A Psychometric Network Analysis.主观幸福感量表的效度证据与信度:一项心理测量网络分析
Trends Psychol. 2023 Jan 3:1-15. doi: 10.1007/s43076-022-00251-x.
2
Translation and validation of the Chinese version of EORTC QLQ-SWB32 assessing the spiritual wellbeing of women with gynecological cancer.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷QLQ-SWB32中文版的翻译与验证:评估妇科癌症女性的精神健康状况
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 15;20(4):e0321790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321790. eCollection 2025.
3
A scoping review of well-being measures: conceptualisation and scales for overall well-being.
一项关于幸福感衡量标准的范围综述:全面幸福感的概念化和量表。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Oct 23;12(1):585. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02074-0.
4
Chinese cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Well-being Numerical Rating Scales.幸福感数字评定量表的中文跨文化调适与验证
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 5;14:1208001. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1208001. eCollection 2023.
5
Spirituality in the Context of Well-being. Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties and Added Value of the Spiritual Attitude and Involvement List Short Form (SAIL-SF).幸福背景下的精神性。精神态度与参与度简表(SAIL-SF)的心理测量特性及附加价值评估。
J Happiness Stud. 2023;24(3):1169-1190. doi: 10.1007/s10902-023-00640-8. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
6
Effects of media use, smart phone addiction, and adult ADHD symptoms on wellbeing of college students during the COVID-19 lockdown: Dispositional hope as a protective factor.新冠疫情封锁期间媒体使用、智能手机成瘾及成人注意缺陷多动障碍症状对大学生幸福感的影响:特质希望作为一种保护因素
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 23;13:1019976. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1019976. eCollection 2022.
7
Spirituality and Well-Being of Children, Adolescent, and Adult Students: A Scientific Mapping of the Literature.儿童、青少年和成年学生的灵性与幸福感:文献的科学图谱。
J Relig Health. 2021 Dec;60(6):4296-4315. doi: 10.1007/s10943-021-01435-y. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
8
Associations between the spiritual well-being (EORTC QLQ-SWB32) and quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30) of patients receiving palliative care for cancer in Cyprus.塞浦路斯癌症姑息治疗患者的精神幸福感(EORTC QLQ-SWB32)与生活质量(EORTC QLQ-C30)之间的关联。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Aug 30;20(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00830-2.
9
Rapid and sound assessment of well-being within a multi-dimensional approach: The Well-being Numerical Rating Scales (WB-NRSs).采用多维方法快速、准确评估幸福感:幸福感数字评定量表(WB-NRSs)。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 14;16(6):e0252709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252709. eCollection 2021.
10
Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the lived experience component of the Spiritual Health And Life-Orientation Measure (SHALOM).《精神健康与生活取向量表(SHALOM)》巴西版生活体验部分的心理测量特性。
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2018 Jan 25;31(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s41155-018-0083-2.