• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估医学治疗的疗效:可能性与局限性。

Evaluating the efficacy of medical treatment: possibilities and limitations.

作者信息

Jenkinson C

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Infirmary, England.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 1995 Nov;41(10):1395-401. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00119-r.

DOI:10.1016/0277-9536(95)00119-r
PMID:8560307
Abstract

This review outlines the possible uses of subjective health status measures in the evaluation of medical treatment, and possible limitations and pitfalls that potential users of such measures must be aware. Whilst much has been written about the requirements of measures in terms of reliability, validity and responsiveness, many existing measures which have gained widespread use have serious shortcomings. In this paper, the limitations of some existing questionnaires are outlined. It is argued that whilst outcomes measurement has the promise to positively influence medical care, done without due consideration of its limitations and weaknesses it could lead to inaccurate or inappropriate data. In the current climate, in which health outcomes data is viewed as central to monitoring and evaluation, inappropriate or unconsidered use of measures could have drastic effects.

摘要

本综述概述了主观健康状况测量在医疗评估中的可能用途,以及此类测量的潜在使用者必须注意的可能局限性和陷阱。虽然关于测量在可靠性、有效性和反应性方面的要求已有大量著述,但许多已广泛使用的现有测量方法存在严重缺陷。本文概述了一些现有问卷的局限性。有人认为,虽然结果测量有望对医疗保健产生积极影响,但如果在没有充分考虑其局限性和弱点的情况下进行,可能会导致数据不准确或不恰当。在当前将健康结果数据视为监测和评估核心的环境中,对测量方法的不当或未经考虑的使用可能会产生巨大影响。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the efficacy of medical treatment: possibilities and limitations.评估医学治疗的疗效:可能性与局限性。
Soc Sci Med. 1995 Nov;41(10):1395-401. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00119-r.
2
Critical evaluation of the use of research tools in evaluating quality of life for people with schizophrenia.对用于评估精神分裂症患者生活质量的研究工具使用情况的批判性评价。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2007 Feb;16(1):2-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2006.00438.x.
3
Developing outcome measures for ambulatory care--an application to asthma and diabetes.制定门诊护理的结果指标——以哮喘和糖尿病为例
Soc Sci Med. 1995 Nov;41(10):1339-48. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00120-v.
4
Validity and reliability of patient reported outcomes used in psoriasis: results from two randomized clinical trials.银屑病患者报告结局的有效性和可靠性:两项随机临床试验的结果
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Oct 8;1:53. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-53.
5
[Health-related quality of life as an outcome measure].
Ugeskr Laeger. 2005 Nov 28;167(48):4545-9.
6
German translation and psychometric testing of the SF-36 Health Survey: preliminary results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment.SF-36健康调查的德语翻译及心理测量测试:国际生活质量评估(IQOLA)项目的初步结果
Soc Sci Med. 1995 Nov;41(10):1359-66. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00115-n.
7
The Trojan Lifetime Champions Health Survey: development, validity, and reliability.特洛伊终身冠军健康调查:开发、效度与信度
J Athl Train. 2015 Apr;50(4):407-18. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-50.2.10. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
8
Clinical and public health perspectives and applications of health-related quality of life measurement.
Soc Sci Med. 1995 Nov;41(10):1383-94. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00116-o.
9
Development of EMPRO: a tool for the standardized assessment of patient-reported outcome measures.EMPRO的开发:一种用于患者报告结局测量标准化评估的工具。
Value Health. 2008 Jul-Aug;11(4):700-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00309.x. Epub 2008 Jan 8.
10
Outcome measures for adult critical care: a systematic review.成人重症监护的结局指标:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(24):1-111.

引用本文的文献

1
Fatigue in Children with Cancer: Reliability and Validity of the Persian Version of Child, Parent, and Staff Fatigue Scale.癌症患儿的疲劳:儿童、家长及医护人员疲劳量表波斯语版本的信度和效度
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2020 Jan 14;7(2):174-179. doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_44_19. eCollection 2020 Apr-Jun.
2
Accuracy and reliability of the Pfeffer Questionnaire for the Brazilian elderly population.巴西老年人群体中Pfeffer问卷的准确性和可靠性。
Dement Neuropsychol. 2015 Apr-Jun;9(2):176-183. doi: 10.1590/1980-57642015DN92000012.
3
Short Form Health Survey version-2.0 Turkish (SF-36v2) is an efficient outcome parameter in musculoskeletal research.
简短健康调查问卷第2版土耳其语版(SF-36v2)是肌肉骨骼研究中一种有效的结果参数。
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016 Oct;50(5):558-561. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2016.08.013. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
4
Translation, cultural adaptation and evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Falls Risk Awareness Questionnaire (FRAQ): FRAQ-Brazil.《跌倒风险意识问卷(FRAQ)的跨文化调适与心理计量特性评估:FRAQ-巴西》。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2013 Nov-Dec;17(6):593-602; quiz 603-5. doi: 10.1590/S1413-35552012005000128.
5
Validation of the modified Vesikari score in children with gastroenteritis in 5 US emergency departments.验证改良 Vesikari 评分在 5 家美国急诊科儿童胃肠炎中的应用。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013 Oct;57(4):514-9. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31829ae5a3.
6
Measuring health-related quality of life in children with cancer living in Mainland China: feasibility, reliability and validity of the Chinese Mandarin version of PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales and 3.0 Cancer Module.测量中国大陆癌症儿童的健康相关生活质量:PedsQL 4.0 通用核心量表和 3.0 癌症模块中文版的可行性、信度和效度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 Nov 23;9:103. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-103.
7
Validation of the Japanese version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Cancer Module.验证日本版儿科生活质量量表(PedsQL)癌症模块。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 Apr 10;9:22. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-22.
8
The pediatric quality of life inventory (PedsQL) family impact module: reliability and validity of the Brazilian version.儿童生活质量量表(PedsQL)家庭影响模块:巴西版本的信度和效度
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008 May 20;6:35. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-6-35.
9
Measurement properties of the Brazilian version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) cancer module scale.巴西版儿童生活质量量表(PedsQL)癌症模块量表的测量属性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008 Jan 22;6:7. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-6-7.
10
The SF36 Version 2: critical analyses of population weights, scoring algorithms and population norms.《SF36 第二版:对总体权重、评分算法和总体规范的批判性分析》
Qual Life Res. 2007 May;16(4):661-73. doi: 10.1007/s11136-006-9154-4. Epub 2007 Feb 1.