Davitt J K, Kaye L W
Graduate School of Social Work and Social Research, Bryn Mawr College, PA 19010, USA.
Soc Work. 1996 Jan;41(1):41-50. doi: 10.1093/sw/41.1.41.
This study examines the policies and procedures that home health care agencies have developed to handle the incapacitated patient and life-sustaining treatment decisions. Data collected from a survey of 154 home health care agency directors and interviews with 92 local agency staff (including nurses and social workers) and 67 patients confirmed that directors, staff, and patients agree that patients are informed about their legal rights. When asked about specific rights, fewer patients were aware of their right to execute an advance directive, and even fewer patients had actually executed one. Only 67 percent of agencies reported having existing policies on advance directives and life-sustaining treatment decisions, whereas 41.5 percent had policies on how to handle the patient with questionable decision-making capacity. Consistent policies are needed for social workers, nurses, and other staff to handle such difficult ethical dilemmas. A review of specific agency policies is presented with recommendations for future policy changes and development.
本研究考察了家庭保健机构为处理无行为能力患者及维持生命治疗决策而制定的政策和程序。通过对154名家庭保健机构主任进行调查,并与92名当地机构工作人员(包括护士和社会工作者)以及67名患者进行访谈收集到的数据证实,主任、工作人员和患者一致认为患者了解自己的合法权利。当被问及具体权利时,了解自己有签署预立医疗指示权利的患者较少,实际签署的患者更少。只有67%的机构报告称有关于预立医疗指示和维持生命治疗决策的现有政策,而41.5%的机构有关于如何处理决策能力存疑患者的政策。社会工作者、护士和其他工作人员需要统一的政策来处理此类棘手的伦理困境。本文展示了对具体机构政策的审查,并对未来政策的改变和制定提出了建议。