Cohen J B
Center for Consumer Research, College of Business Administration, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611-7150, USA.
Am J Public Health. 1996 Jan;86(1):18-24. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.1.18.
This article examines health policy implications of providing smokers with numerical tar yield information in cigarette advertising.
Results of a national probability telephone survey regarding smokers' knowledge and understanding of numerical tar yields and deliveries are reported.
Few smokers knew the tar level of their own cigarettes (the exception being smokers of 1- to 5-mg tar cigarettes), and a majority could not correctly judge the relative tar levels of cigarettes. Smokers were unsure whether switching to lower-tar cigarettes would reduce their personal health risks. Many smokers relied on absolute numbers in making trade-offs between number of cigarettes smoked and their tar levels, thus confusion machine-rated tar-yields with actual amounts ingested.
The wisdom of the present method of providing tar and nicotine numbers in ads and recommendations for modifying the test protocol are now under discussion. This research indicates that these tar numbers and their implications are poorly understood. The paper recommends revisions in tar ratings to make them more useful and a required statement on cigarette packages to more explicitly relate tar levels to major health risks.
本文探讨在香烟广告中向吸烟者提供焦油数值信息对健康政策的影响。
报告了一项关于吸烟者对焦油数值及输送量的知晓和理解情况的全国概率电话调查结果。
很少有吸烟者知道自己所吸香烟的焦油含量(吸1至5毫克焦油香烟的吸烟者除外),大多数人无法正确判断香烟的相对焦油含量。吸烟者不确定改吸低焦油香烟是否会降低个人健康风险。许多吸烟者在权衡吸烟数量和焦油含量时依赖绝对数值,因此将机器测定的焦油产量与实际摄入量混淆。
目前在广告中提供焦油和尼古丁数值的方法是否明智以及修改测试方案的建议正在讨论中。这项研究表明,这些焦油数值及其含义未得到充分理解。本文建议修订焦油评级使其更有用,并在香烟包装上要求有声明以更明确地将焦油含量与主要健康风险联系起来。