Li D K, Checkoway H, Mueller B A
Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Medical Group, Oakland, CA 94611, USA.
Epidemiology. 1995 Sep;6(5):485-9. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199509000-00004.
To study the potential effect of prenatal exposure to electromagnetic fields on the occurrence of cogenital urinary tract anomalies (CUTAs) in offspring, we conducted a case-control study in western Washington State. CUTA cases without known chromosomal abnormalities were identified from the Washington Birth Defects Registry. Controls without birth defects were randomly selected from among infants born in five large hospitals in King County, WA. Mothers of cases and controls were interviewed to obtain information on prenatal use of electric blankets, electrically heated water beds, and video display terminals. After adjustment for potential confounders, the risk of CUTAs was found not to be materially associated with these prenatal exposures among all subjects. Among women with a history of subfertility, however, prenatal use of electric blankets was associated with a more than four-fold increase in the risk of CUTAs [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 4.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.9-22.7]. The risk was greater if the exposure occurred during the first trimester (adjusted OR = 10.0; 95% CI = 1.2-85.5). The risk also appeared to increase with increasing duration of electric blanket use. Despite small numbers and the potential for recall bias, our study indicates that identifying a susceptible population may be required for detecting adverse reproductive effects of electromagnetic fields.
为研究孕期暴露于电磁场对后代先天性泌尿道异常(CUTAs)发生的潜在影响,我们在华盛顿州西部开展了一项病例对照研究。从华盛顿出生缺陷登记处识别出无已知染色体异常的CUTA病例。对照组为华盛顿州金县五家大型医院出生的无出生缺陷的婴儿,随机选取。对病例组和对照组的母亲进行访谈,以获取孕期使用电热毯、电热水床和视频显示终端的信息。在对潜在混杂因素进行调整后,发现所有受试者中CUTAs的风险与这些孕期暴露无显著关联。然而,在有不孕史的女性中,孕期使用电热毯与CUTAs风险增加四倍以上相关[调整后的优势比(OR)= 4.4;95%置信区间(CI)= 0.9 - 22.7]。如果暴露发生在孕早期,风险更高(调整后的OR = 10.0;95% CI = 1.2 - 85.5)。风险似乎也随着电热毯使用时间的增加而增加。尽管样本量小且存在回忆偏倚的可能性,但我们的研究表明,识别易感人群对于检测电磁场的不良生殖影响可能是必要的。