Nichols W W, Conti C R, Walker W E, Milnor W R
Circ Res. 1977 May;40(5):451-8. doi: 10.1161/01.res.40.5.451.
To determine the systemic input impedance, pulsatile pressure and flow were measured in the ascending aorta in 16 human subjects who were undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization. Blood flow was measured with a catheter-tip electromagnetic velocity meter, and pressure with an external transducer connected with the fluid-filled lumen of the catheter. Five subjects were found to have no evidence of cardiovascular disease (group A, mean age 32 +/- 2 years, mean aortic pressure 97 +/- 4 mm Hg). Seven had clinical and angiographic signs of coronary arterial disease, and mean pressures less than 100 mm Hg (group B, mean age 48 +/- 2 years). Four subjects had signs of coronary disease and mean pressures greater than 100 mm Hg (group C, mean age 48 +/- 3 years). The frequency spectra of impedance were qualitatively similar in all three groups and resembled those previously observed in the canine aorta. Characteristic impedance was lower in the normal subjects (group A, average 53 dyn sec cm-5) than in the subjects with coronary artery disease (groups B and C, average 129 dyn sec cm-5). Among the subjects with coronary disease, characteristic impedance was higher in the hypertensive subjects (group C, average 202 dyn sec cm-5) than in those with lower mean pressures (group B, average 95 dyn sec cm-5). External left ventricular work per unit time (hydraulic power) averaged 1715 milliwatts (mW) in group A, 1120 mW in group B, and 2372 mW in group C. Cardiac outputs were within normal limits in all subjects, but tended to be lower in group B than in group C. These results suggest that the subjects of group C were better able to meet the increased energy demands imposed by an abnormally high aortic input impedance. Further investigation is needed to learn whether the high impedances in subjects with coronary disease represent an increase with age and transmural pressure alone, or whether some additional factor is involved. The data on relatively normal subjects permit a tentative definition of the normal limits for aortic input impedance in man: 26-80 dyn sec cm-5.
为了测定体循环输入阻抗,对16名接受诊断性心导管检查的人类受试者的升主动脉搏动压力和血流进行了测量。使用导管尖端电磁速度计测量血流,使用与导管充满液体的内腔相连的外部换能器测量压力。发现5名受试者无心血管疾病证据(A组,平均年龄32±2岁,平均主动脉压力97±4 mmHg)。7名受试者有冠状动脉疾病的临床和血管造影征象,平均压力低于100 mmHg(B组,平均年龄48±2岁)。4名受试者有冠状动脉疾病征象且平均压力高于100 mmHg(C组,平均年龄48±3岁)。三组的阻抗频谱在质量上相似,与先前在犬主动脉中观察到的频谱相似。正常受试者(A组,平均53 dyn·sec·cm⁻⁵)的特性阻抗低于患有冠状动脉疾病的受试者(B组和C组,平均129 dyn·sec·cm⁻⁵)。在患有冠状动脉疾病的受试者中,高血压受试者(C组,平均202 dyn·sec·cm⁻⁵)的特性阻抗高于平均压力较低的受试者(B组,平均95 dyn·sec·cm⁻⁵)。A组单位时间的外部左心室功(水力功率)平均为1715毫瓦(mW),B组为1120 mW,C组为2372 mW。所有受试者的心输出量均在正常范围内,但B组的心输出量往往低于C组。这些结果表明,C组受试者能够更好地满足异常高的主动脉输入阻抗所带来的增加的能量需求。需要进一步研究以了解患有冠状动脉疾病的受试者中的高阻抗是仅随年龄和跨壁压力增加,还是涉及一些其他因素。相对正常受试者的数据允许对人体主动脉输入阻抗的正常范围进行初步定义:26 - 80 dyn·sec·cm⁻⁵。