• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脂质体前列腺素E1治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征:一项安慰剂对照、随机、双盲、多中心临床试验

Liposomal prostaglandin E1 in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial.

作者信息

Abraham E, Park Y C, Covington P, Conrad S A, Schwartz M

机构信息

University of Colorado, Department of Medicine, Denver, USA.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1996 Jan;24(1):10-5. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199601000-00005.

DOI:10.1097/00003246-199601000-00005
PMID:8565513
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of liposomal prostaglandin E1 (TLC C-53) in the treatment of patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

DESIGN

Randomized, prospective, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II clinical trial.

SETTING

Eight community and university-affiliated hospitals in the United States.

PATIENTS

Twenty-five patients with ARDS.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were prospectively randomized in an unbalanced ratio within each site to receive either TLC C-53 (n = 17) or placebo (n = 8). Study drug was infused intravenously over 60 mins every 6 hrs for a 7-day period, starting at a dose of 0.15 micrograms/kg/hr. The dose was increased every 12 hrs until the maximal dose (3.6 micrograms/kg/hr) was attained, intolerance to further increases developed, or invasive monitoring was discontinued. Patients received standard, aggressive, medical/surgical care throughout the trial.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Outcome measurements were Pao2/FI0(2), dynamic pulmonary compliance, ventilator dependence on day 8, and 28-day all-cause mortality rate. At baseline, the distribution of variables describing Lung Injury Scores, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores, Pao2/FI0(2), pulmonary compliance, and time from onset of ARDS to first dose of study drug was similar between patients in the TLC C-53 and placebo treatment groups. On day 8, all eight patients given placebo required mechanical ventilation, while eight of 17 patients given TLC C-53 were healthy enough to be removed from the ventilator (p = .03). Improvement in PaO2/FIO2 during the initial 8-day study period was greater in patients receiving TLC C-53. This trend achieved statistical significance on day 3, when the increase in PaO2/FIO2 from baseline was 82.5 +/- 14.6 in the TLC C-53 group compared with 28.3 +/- 22.1 in the placebo group (p = .05). By day 8, lung compliance also increased from baseline significantly more in TLC C-53 patients than in placebo patients (5.7 +/- 1.7 vs -1.5 +/- 1.8 mL/cm H2O; p = .01). The 28-day mortality rate was 6% (1/17 patients) in the TLC C-53 group and 25% (2/8 patients) in the placebo group (p = .23). Drug-related adverse events were reported in 82% of the patients receiving TLC C-53 compared with 38% of the placebo group, with half of the adverse events in the TLC C-53 group being localized infusion site irritation. TLC C-53 was hemodynamically well tolerated, with transient hypotension occurring in three patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ARDS, TLC C-53 was associated with improved oxygenation, increased lung compliance, and decreased ventilator dependency.

摘要

目的

评估脂质体前列腺素E1(TLC C - 53)治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者的安全性和有效性。

设计

随机、前瞻性、多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照的II期临床试验。

地点

美国八家社区及大学附属医院。

患者

25例ARDS患者。

干预措施

患者在各研究地点按不均衡比例进行前瞻性随机分组,分别接受TLC C - 53(n = 17)或安慰剂(n = 8)治疗。研究药物每6小时静脉输注60分钟,共7天,起始剂量为0.15微克/千克/小时。每12小时增加一次剂量,直至达到最大剂量(3.6微克/千克/小时)、出现进一步增加剂量不耐受情况或停止有创监测。在整个试验过程中,患者接受标准、积极的内科/外科治疗。

测量指标及主要结果

观察指标包括动脉血氧分压/吸入氧分数值(Pao2/FI0(2))、动态肺顺应性、第8天的呼吸机依赖情况以及28天全因死亡率。基线时,TLC C - 53治疗组和安慰剂治疗组患者在描述肺损伤评分、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分II、Pao2/FI0(2)、肺顺应性以及从ARDS发病到首次给予研究药物的时间等变量分布相似。第8天,所有8例接受安慰剂治疗的患者均需机械通气,而17例接受TLC C - 53治疗的患者中有8例身体状况良好可撤机(p = 0.03)。在最初8天的研究期间,接受TLC C - 53治疗的患者PaO2/FIO2改善更明显。这一趋势在第3天达到统计学意义,此时TLC C - 53组PaO2/FIO2较基线增加82.5±14.6,而安慰剂组为28.3±22.1(p = 0.05)。到第8天,TLC C - 53组患者肺顺应性较基线的增加也显著高于安慰剂组患者(5.7±1.7 vs -1.5±1.8 mL/cm H2O;p = 0.01)。TLC C - 53组28天死亡率为6%(1/17例患者),安慰剂组为25%(2/8例患者)(p = 0.23)。接受TLC C - 53治疗的患者中82%报告有药物相关不良事件,而安慰剂组为38%,TLC C - 53组不良事件半数为局部输注部位刺激。TLC C - 53在血流动力学方面耐受性良好,3例患者出现短暂性低血压。

结论

在ARDS患者中,TLC C - 53与氧合改善、肺顺应性增加及呼吸机依赖减少相关。

相似文献

1
Liposomal prostaglandin E1 in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial.脂质体前列腺素E1治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征:一项安慰剂对照、随机、双盲、多中心临床试验
Crit Care Med. 1996 Jan;24(1):10-5. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199601000-00005.
2
Liposomal prostaglandin E1 (TLC C-53) in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a controlled, randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial. TLC C-53 ARDS Study Group.脂质体前列腺素E1(TLC C-53)治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征:一项对照、随机、双盲、多中心临床试验。TLC C-53急性呼吸窘迫综合征研究组
Crit Care Med. 1999 Aug;27(8):1478-85. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199908000-00013.
3
A multi-centre, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of liposomal prostaglandin E1 (TLC C-53) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.一项关于脂质体前列腺素E1(TLC C-53)治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2001 Oct;27(10):1578-83. doi: 10.1007/s001340101077.
4
Effects of inhaled nitric oxide in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: results of a randomized phase II trial. Inhaled Nitric Oxide in ARDS Study Group.吸入一氧化氮对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的影响:一项随机II期试验的结果。急性呼吸窘迫综合征吸入一氧化氮研究组。
Crit Care Med. 1998 Jan;26(1):15-23. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199801000-00011.
5
Treatment with N-acetylcysteine during acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study.急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者使用N-乙酰半胱氨酸治疗:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的临床研究。
J Crit Care. 1997 Dec;12(4):177-82. doi: 10.1016/s0883-9441(97)90029-0.
6
Neutrophil elastase inhibition in acute lung injury: results of the STRIVE study.急性肺损伤中中性粒细胞弹性蛋白酶抑制作用:STRIVE研究结果
Crit Care Med. 2004 Aug;32(8):1695-702. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000133332.48386.85.
7
N-acetylcysteine enhances recovery from acute lung injury in man. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study.N-乙酰半胱氨酸可促进人类急性肺损伤的恢复。一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的临床研究。
Chest. 1994 Jan;105(1):190-4. doi: 10.1378/chest.105.1.190.
8
Double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot randomized trial of methylprednisolone infusion in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome.甲泼尼龙输注治疗小儿急性呼吸窘迫综合征的双盲、安慰剂对照试验性随机试验
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015 Mar;16(3):e74-81. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000349.
9
Nebulised heparin for patients with or at risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.雾化肝素治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者或有急性呼吸窘迫综合征风险患者的多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照 3 期试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Apr;9(4):360-372. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30470-7. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
10
[Effect of different transpulmonary pressures guided mechanical ventilation on respiratory and hemodynamics of patients with ARDS: a prospective randomized controlled trial].[不同跨肺压指导下的机械通气对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者呼吸及血流动力学的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照试验]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2017 Jan;29(1):39-44. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2017.01.009.

引用本文的文献

1
Representation of Hispanic Patients in Clinical Trials for Respiratory Failure: A Systematic Review.西班牙裔患者在呼吸衰竭临床试验中的代表性:一项系统综述。
Crit Care Explor. 2025 Jan 13;7(1):e1193. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001193. eCollection 2025 Jan 1.
2
Impact of differences in acute respiratory distress syndrome randomised controlled trial inclusion and exclusion criteria: systematic review and meta-analysis.急性呼吸窘迫综合征随机对照试验纳入和排除标准差异的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Anaesth. 2021 Jul;127(1):85-101. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.02.027. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
3
Pharmacological agents for adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome.
用于成人急性呼吸窘迫综合征的药物制剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 23;7(7):CD004477. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004477.pub3.
4
Aerosolized prostacyclins for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).雾化吸入前列环素治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 14;7(7):CD007733. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007733.pub3.
5
The clinical practice guideline for the management of ARDS in Japan.日本急性呼吸窘迫综合征管理临床实践指南。
J Intensive Care. 2017 Jul 25;5:50. doi: 10.1186/s40560-017-0222-3. eCollection 2017.
6
Stearidonic and γ-linolenic acids in echium oil improves glucose disposal in insulin resistant monkeys.壁花油中的硬脂烯酸和γ-亚麻酸可改善胰岛素抵抗猴子的葡萄糖处置。
Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2013 Jul;89(1):39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.plefa.2013.04.003. Epub 2013 May 7.
7
Acute lung failure.急性呼吸衰竭。
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Oct;32(5):607-25. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1287870. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
8
Clinical Aspects of Acute Lung Insufficiency (ALI/TRALI).急性肺功能不全(ALI/TRALI)的临床方面
Transfus Med Hemother. 2008;35(2):80-88. doi: 10.1159/000117582. Epub 2008 Mar 10.
9
Pharmacotherapy of acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome.急性肺损伤与急性呼吸窘迫综合征的药物治疗
J Intensive Care Med. 2006 May-Jun;21(3):119-43. doi: 10.1177/0885066606287045.
10
[Management of acute pulmonary failure: diagnostics-ventilation-withdrawal].[急性肺衰竭的管理:诊断-通气-撤机]
Internist (Berl). 2005 Mar;46(3):298-309. doi: 10.1007/s00108-005-1354-4.