Pohlman J K, Kirkley B A, Easley K A, Washington J A
Department of Clinical Pathology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH 44195-5140, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Oct;33(10):2525-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.10.2525-2529.1995.
A controlled clinical comparison was carried out with the BACTEC 9240 Aerobic/F resin bottle and the Isolator system with adult patients suspected of having bloodstream infections. A total of 10,500 paired specimens were collected, of which 1,122 from 520 patients were positive. There were 68 false-positive BACTEC bottles; 259 positive cultures that were excluded from analysis because the bottle, the Isolator, or both failed to meet the minimum volume criterion of 8 ml of blood; and 207 positive cultures that were excluded because the isolates were found to be clinically insignificant or of indeterminate clinical significance on the basis of patient assessment. A total of 656 positive cultures from 258 patients formed the basis of the analysis. Significantly more Staphylococcus aureus isolates (P = 0.03), Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates (P = 0.03), members of the family Enterobacteriaceae (P = 0.03), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates (P = 0.04) were recovered from the resin bottle, and there was no category of organism that was recovered significantly more frequently from the Isolator system. With patients receiving antibiotics at the time of blood culture, S. aureus, S. epidermidis, and gram-negative bacilli were recovered significantly more frequently from the resin bottle. No significant differences between systems were found with cultures from patients not receiving antibiotics at the time of blood culture. Only 12 clinically significant organisms were recovered from the bottle on terminal subcultures, and only 1 of these had not been previously isolated from another blood culture set (10 of the 12) or from the companion Isolator (1 of 12). The Aerobic/F resin bottle continuously monitored in the BACTEC 9240 instrument proved to be superior to the Isolator in overall yield of organisms causing bloodstream infection in adults and required less technician time for specimen processing and examination than the Isolator system.
对疑似血流感染的成年患者,使用BACTEC 9240需氧/F树脂瓶和Isolator系统进行了对照临床比较。共采集了10500对标本,其中520例患者的1122份标本呈阳性。BACTEC瓶有68例假阳性;259份阳性培养物因瓶子、Isolator或两者均未达到8ml血液的最低体积标准而被排除在分析之外;207份阳性培养物因根据患者评估发现分离株临床意义不显著或临床意义不确定而被排除。来自258例患者的656份阳性培养物构成了分析的基础。从树脂瓶中分离出的金黄色葡萄球菌分离株(P = 0.03)、表皮葡萄球菌分离株(P = 0.03)、肠杆菌科成员(P = 0.03)和铜绿假单胞菌分离株(P = 0.04)明显更多,且没有一类微生物从Isolator系统中分离出的频率明显更高。在进行血培养时接受抗生素治疗的患者中,从树脂瓶中分离出金黄色葡萄球菌、表皮葡萄球菌和革兰氏阴性杆菌的频率明显更高。在进行血培养时未接受抗生素治疗的患者的培养物中,未发现两种系统之间存在显著差异。在终末传代培养时,从瓶子中仅分离出12种具有临床意义的微生物,其中只有1种此前未从另一组血培养(12种中的10种)或配套的Isolator(12种中的1种)中分离出。在BACTEC 9240仪器中持续监测的需氧/F树脂瓶在导致成人血流感染的微生物总体检出率方面优于Isolator,并且与Isolator系统相比,标本处理和检查所需的技术人员时间更少。