• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Interrater reliability of the Glasgow Coma Scale.

作者信息

Juarez V J, Lyons M

机构信息

Cottonwood Hospital, Murray, Utah, USA.

出版信息

J Neurosci Nurs. 1995 Oct;27(5):283-6. doi: 10.1097/01376517-199510000-00008.

DOI:10.1097/01376517-199510000-00008
PMID:8568344
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test the interrater reliability of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) when used in assessing neurologically impaired patients. In order to control variables, a videotape was developed of seven patients with different neurological impairments. A total of 57 nurses and physicians with varying degrees of education and experience used the GCS to score the patient responses. These responses were then compared for consensus and against a criterion standard. The comparison showed a low disagreement rating and a moderate to high agreement rating demonstrating that this tool has good interrater reliability (p = 0.000). Nurses may use this tool with confidence as one measure of assessment in evaluating neurologically impaired patients.

摘要

相似文献

1
Interrater reliability of the Glasgow Coma Scale.
J Neurosci Nurs. 1995 Oct;27(5):283-6. doi: 10.1097/01376517-199510000-00008.
2
A pediatric FOUR score coma scale: interrater reliability and predictive validity.儿科 FOUR 分昏迷量表:评分者间信度和预测效度。
J Neurosci Nurs. 2014 Apr;46(2):79-87. doi: 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000041.
3
Interrater reliability of the Glasgow Coma Scale scoring among nurses in sub-specialties of critical care.重症监护各亚专业护士之间格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分的评分者间信度。
Aust Crit Care. 2001 Aug;14(3):100-5. doi: 10.1016/s1036-7314(01)80026-6.
4
Interrater reliability and predictive validity of the FOUR score coma scale in a pediatric population.儿科人群中FOUR昏迷评分量表的评分者间信度和预测效度。
J Neurosci Nurs. 2009 Oct;41(5):261-7; quiz 268-9. doi: 10.1097/jnn.0b013e3181b2c766.
5
Interrater reliability of Glasgow Coma Scale scores in the emergency department.急诊科格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分的评分者间信度。
Ann Emerg Med. 2004 Feb;43(2):215-23. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(03)00814-x.
6
Variability in agreement between physicians and nurses when measuring the Glasgow Coma Scale in the emergency department limits its clinical usefulness.在急诊科测量格拉斯哥昏迷量表时,医生和护士之间一致性的差异限制了该量表的临床实用性。
Emerg Med Australas. 2006 Aug;18(4):379-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2006.00867.x.
7
[Interobserver reliability of the Glasgow coma scale in critically ill patients with neurological and/or neurosurgical disease].[格拉斯哥昏迷量表在患有神经和/或神经外科疾病的重症患者中的观察者间可靠性]
Enferm Intensiva. 2014 Jan-Mar;25(1):15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.enfi.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Dec 3.
8
Inter-Rater Reliability Between Critical Care Nurses Performing a Pediatric Modification to the Glasgow Coma Scale.重症监护护士对儿童格拉斯哥昏迷量表进行儿科改良后的组间可靠性。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Jul;20(7):660-666. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001938.
9
Validation of a new coma scale: The FOUR score.一种新的昏迷量表的验证:FOUR评分
Ann Neurol. 2005 Oct;58(4):585-93. doi: 10.1002/ana.20611.
10
Reliability of the Glasgow Coma Scale for the emergency department evaluation of poisoned patients.
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2004 Apr;23(4):197-200. doi: 10.1191/0960327104ht436oa.

引用本文的文献

1
Human Computer Interface for Tracking Eye Movements Improves Assessment and Diagnosis of Patients With Acquired Brain Injuries.用于跟踪眼动的人机界面改善了后天性脑损伤患者的评估和诊断。
Front Neurol. 2019 Jan 23;10:6. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00006. eCollection 2019.
2
Reliability of Robotic Telemedicine for Assessing Critically Ill Patients with the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness Score and Glasgow Coma Scale.使用无反应完全概述评分和格拉斯哥昏迷量表评估重症患者的机器人远程医疗的可靠性
Telemed J E Health. 2017 Jul;23(7):555-560. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2016.0225. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
3
The reliability of the Glasgow Coma Scale: a systematic review.
格拉斯哥昏迷量表的可靠性:系统评价。
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Jan;42(1):3-15. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-4124-3. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
4
The FOUR score and GCS as predictors of outcome after traumatic brain injury.四项评分和格拉斯哥昏迷评分作为创伤性脑损伤后结局的预测指标。
Neurocrit Care. 2014 Aug;21(1):52-7. doi: 10.1007/s12028-013-9947-6.
5
A new simple model for prediction of hospital mortality in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.一种用于预测脑出血患者住院死亡率的新简单模型。
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2012 Jun;18(6):482-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5949.2012.00320.x.
6
Effect of the modified Glasgow Coma Scale score criteria for mild traumatic brain injury on mortality prediction: comparing classic and modified Glasgow Coma Scale score model scores of 13.改良格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分标准对轻度创伤性脑损伤死亡率预测的影响:比较经典和改良格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为13分时的模型评分
J Trauma. 2011 Nov;71(5):1185-92; discussion 1193. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31823321f8.
7
Primary outcomes for resuscitation science studies: a consensus statement from the American Heart Association.复苏科学研究的主要结局指标:美国心脏协会的共识声明。
Circulation. 2011 Nov 8;124(19):2158-77. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182340239. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
8
Evaluation of coma: a critical appraisal of popular scoring systems.昏迷评估:常用评分系统的批判性评价。
Neurocrit Care. 2011 Feb;14(1):134-43. doi: 10.1007/s12028-010-9409-3.
9
External validation of the ICH score.国际协调会议(ICH)评分的外部验证
Neurocrit Care. 2004;1(1):53-60. doi: 10.1385/NCC:1:1:53.