Freeborn D K, Hooker R S
Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, OR 97227-1098, USA.
Public Health Rep. 1995 Nov-Dec;110(6):714-9.
Health maintenance organizations have employed physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and other nonphysician providers for decades, yet there is little information on how satisfied these providers are with this form of practice. This paper examines how physician assistants evaluate their experience practicing in a large group model health maintenance organization and compares their attitudes and satisfaction levels with those of other nonphysician providers-nurse practitioners, optometrists, mental health therapists, and chemical dependency counselors. The data source is a 1992 survey of 5,000 nonphysician employees of a health maintenance organization. The survey instrument was a self-administrated questionnaire that included both structured and open-ended questions. The response rate averaged 88 percent for physician assistants and the other non-physician providers. Physician assistants expressed the most satisfaction with the amount of responsibility, support from coworkers, job security, working hours, supervision, and task variety. They were less satisfied with workload, control over the pace of work, and opportunities for advancement. Most physician assistants were also satisfied with pay and fringe benefits. Compared with other nonphysician providers, chemical dependency counselors expressed the highest levels of satisfaction across the various dimensions of work and optometrists the lowest. Nurse practitioners, chemical dependency counselors, and mental health professionals also tended to be satisfied with most aspects of practice in this setting. In a number of instances, they were more satisfied than the physician assistants. The findings are consistent with other studies that found health maintenance organizations to be favorable practice settings for physician assistants. The limits of physician assistant involvement and their role satisfaction and efficient use in HMOs are more likely to relate to physician attitudes and acceptance than to lack of support by coworkers and other attributes of the work environment.
健康维护组织雇佣医师助理、执业护士和其他非医师医疗服务提供者已有数十年,但关于这些医疗服务提供者对这种执业形式的满意度的信息却很少。本文研究了医师助理如何评价他们在大型团体模式健康维护组织中的执业经历,并将他们的态度和满意度水平与其他非医师医疗服务提供者——执业护士、验光师、心理健康治疗师和药物依赖顾问——进行比较。数据来源是对一家健康维护组织的5000名非医师雇员进行的1992年调查。调查工具是一份自我管理的问卷,其中包括结构化和开放式问题。医师助理和其他非医师医疗服务提供者的平均回复率为88%。医师助理对责任量、同事的支持、工作保障、工作时间、监督和任务多样性最为满意。他们对工作量、工作节奏的控制和晋升机会不太满意。大多数医师助理对薪资和福利待遇也很满意。与其他非医师医疗服务提供者相比,药物依赖顾问在工作的各个方面的满意度最高,而验光师的满意度最低。执业护士、药物依赖顾问和心理健康专业人员在这种环境下对执业的大多数方面也往往感到满意。在许多情况下,他们比医师助理更满意。这些发现与其他研究一致,这些研究发现健康维护组织是医师助理有利的执业环境。医师助理参与的局限性及其在健康维护组织中的角色满意度和有效利用,更有可能与医师的态度和接受程度有关,而不是与同事的支持不足和工作环境的其他因素有关。