Weiner J P, Steinwachs D M, Williamson J W
Am J Public Health. 1986 May;76(5):507-11. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.5.507.
This study empirically examines the practices of non-physician providers (NPPs) within three large competitive health maintenance organizations (HMOs), as well as the physicians' and NPPs' views regarding the ideal role of NPPs. These roles are compared with NPP delegation patterns incorporated in the modeling methodology developed by the Graduate Medical Education National Advisory Committee (GMENAC). GMENAC recommended relatively high levels of delegation by physicians to NPPs. One of the HMO sites made use of NPPs at rates even higher than GMENAC's national ideals, while the rates at the other two were lower. The normative ideals for pediatric NPPs developed at each HMO were consistently higher than their actual roles. Concerns with acceptance and the role of NPPs are clearly no longer issues. Instead, the limits on NPP involvement appear to relate to considerations of costs, availability, and the increasing numbers of physicians competing for similar opportunities.
本研究实证考察了三家大型竞争性健康维护组织(HMO)中非医师提供者(NPP)的执业情况,以及医师和NPP对NPP理想角色的看法。这些角色与研究生医学教育全国咨询委员会(GMENAC)开发的建模方法中纳入的NPP授权模式进行了比较。GMENAC建议医师对NPP进行相对较高水平的授权。其中一个HMO机构使用NPP的比例甚至高于GMENAC的全国理想水平,而另外两个机构的比例则较低。每个HMO制定的儿科NPP的规范理想水平始终高于其实际角色。对NPP接受度和角色的担忧显然已不再是问题。相反,NPP参与的限制似乎与成本、可用性以及争夺类似机会的医师数量增加等因素有关。