Suppr超能文献

评估高血压患者的新方面:在医生办公室测量血压——动态血压监测——血压自我测量

[New aspects in evaluating the hypertensive patient: measuring blood pressure in the physician's office--ambulatory blood pressure monitoring--blood pressure self-measurement].

作者信息

Magometschnigg D

机构信息

Abteilung für Klinische Pharmakologie, Universität Wien.

出版信息

Acta Med Austriaca. 1995;22(3):38-43.

PMID:8571748
Abstract

The "average" blood pressure of hypertensives, which is held responsible for the adverse effects of hypertension is poorly reflected by causal readings (CR), which are taken as a surrogate. CR do not only differ from average blood pressures, but also fail to give information on blood pressure variability. According to white coat effect and blood pressure variability a satisfying classification of severity and consecutively of prognosis cannot be done in an individual. Furthermore CR fail to inform us sufficiently about therapeutic effects in single patients. To improve we have to change to blood pressure judgements which are based on many instead of occasional readings. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABM) is a possibility to overcome this weakness. Compared to casual readings the average of the ambulatory readings is higher reproducible and does not depend on placebo treatment. In spite of this advantage a general substitution of CR by ABM is impossible because the number of equipment available is too small, nobody wants to cover the costs, the procedure is inconvenient, and up till now we miss guidelines how to proceed in the daily routine. Blood pressure self-monitoring is an additional way to improve the weakness of CR. The amount of blood pressure readings needed for a satisfying judgement of blood pressure are taken and registered by the patients. The self recorded data can be used as a valuable data base to calculate average blood pressure and blood pressure variability and drug effects. Mean values of twice daily recordings of a month are highly reproducible and do highly correlate to average ABM recordings of the day.

摘要

高血压患者的“平均”血压被认为是高血压产生不良影响的原因,但因果读数(CR)却难以很好地反映这一平均血压,而因果读数被用作替代指标。因果读数不仅与平均血压不同,而且无法提供血压变异性的信息。根据白大衣效应和血压变异性,无法对个体的严重程度及预后进行令人满意的分类。此外,因果读数也无法充分告知我们单个患者的治疗效果。为了改进,我们必须转向基于多次测量而非偶尔几次测量的血压判断方法。动态血压监测(ABM)是克服这一弱点的一种方法。与偶然测量相比,动态血压读数的平均值具有更高的可重复性,且不依赖于安慰剂治疗。尽管有这一优势,但用动态血压监测全面替代因果读数是不可能的,因为可用设备数量太少,没人愿意承担费用,操作也不方便,而且到目前为止我们还缺少日常操作的指导原则。血压自我监测是改善因果读数弱点的另一种方法。患者自行测量并记录下用于满意判断血压所需的血压读数。自我记录的数据可作为计算平均血压、血压变异性和药物效果的宝贵数据库。一个月内每天两次记录的平均值具有高度可重复性,且与当日动态血压监测的平均值高度相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验