Fein O
Cornell University Medical College, New York, New York 10021, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 1995 Oct;10(10):577-86. doi: 10.1007/BF02640369.
To summarize recent and past American and British studies on the relationship of social class and health status.
A systematic review of the pertinent British and American literature, including references identified from bibliographies of books and recent articles.
Published English-language studies that report original or summary data describing socioeconomic status and mortality/morbidity are emphasized.
Social class, whether measured by occupation, income, or education, has a marked effect on mortality and morbidity. Use of British and American standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) shows that the gap between the advantaged upper socioeconomic classes and the disadvantaged lower classes has become wider from 1930 to 1980. Explanations for this inequality in health status by socioeconomic status point to four factors: artefact, social selection, culture/behavior, and material/structural conditions. A synthesis of existing literature suggests that material deprivation and social deprivation are the most important factors contributing to this association, although data from longitudinal studies implicate social hierarchy.
The reviewed studies point to growing inequalities in health status between those of lower and those of higher socioeconomic status. Clinicians and teachers in internal medicine should incorporate this knowledge in assessing patients and adopt a perspective that takes account of socioeconomic factors in diagnostic and management decisions.
总结美国和英国近期及以往关于社会阶层与健康状况关系的研究。
对相关英美文献进行系统综述,包括从书籍和近期文章的参考文献中识别出的文献。
重点关注发表的英文研究,这些研究报告了描述社会经济地位和死亡率/发病率的原始数据或汇总数据。
社会阶层,无论以职业、收入还是教育来衡量,对死亡率和发病率都有显著影响。使用英美标准化死亡率比(SMR)表明,从1930年到1980年,优势较高社会经济阶层与劣势较低阶层之间的差距变得更大。社会经济地位导致健康状况不平等的原因指向四个因素:人为因素、社会选择、文化/行为以及物质/结构条件。现有文献的综合表明,物质匮乏和社会剥夺是导致这种关联的最重要因素,尽管纵向研究的数据表明社会等级制度也有影响。
所综述的研究表明,社会经济地位较低者与较高者之间的健康状况不平等在加剧。内科临床医生和教师在评估患者时应纳入这一知识,并在诊断和管理决策中采用考虑社会经济因素的视角。