• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瑞典人工授精法案与供体的可获得性。

The Swedish insemination act and the availability of donors.

作者信息

Daniels K, Lalos O

机构信息

Department of Social Work, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 1995 Jul;10(7):1871-4. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136196.

DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136196
PMID:8583002
Abstract

Sweden was in 1985 the first country in the world to enact legislation concerned with the practice of donor insemination (DI). Included in this legislation was the requirement that information about the identity of the donors be kept and be made available to the resultant offspring upon 'maturity', should they seek this. This provision has attracted much interest, debate and criticism, and claims have been made that this has led to a decline in the numbers of men coming forward to donate semen in Sweden. This paper presents data covering the pre- and post-legislation period from one clinic, along with the only available data on all the Swedish clinics providing DI, which covers a more limited post-legislation period. This data shows that there has been an increase in number of donors being recruited, suggesting that the possibility of future contact by genetic offspring has not had the negative impact on the availability of donors predicted.

摘要

瑞典在1985年成为世界上第一个颁布有关供体人工授精(DI)实施的立法的国家。该立法包括一项要求,即保存供体身份信息,并在后代“成年”后(如果他们寻求这些信息)向其提供。这一规定引起了广泛关注、辩论和批评,有人声称这导致了瑞典自愿捐献精液的男性数量下降。本文展示了来自一家诊所的立法前后时期的数据,以及瑞典所有提供DI的诊所仅有的可用数据,这些数据涵盖的立法后时期更为有限。这些数据表明,招募的供体数量有所增加,这表明基因后代未来可能进行接触这一情况并未对供体的可获得性产生预期的负面影响。

相似文献

1
The Swedish insemination act and the availability of donors.瑞典人工授精法案与供体的可获得性。
Hum Reprod. 1995 Jul;10(7):1871-4. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136196.
2
The Swedish Insemination Act and its impact.瑞典人工授精法案及其影响。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994 Aug;34(4):437-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1994.tb01265.x.
3
Attitudes towards disclosure and relationship to donor offspring among a national cohort of identity-release oocyte and sperm donors.全国一批身份公开的卵母细胞和精子捐赠者对信息披露的态度及其与捐赠后代的关系。
Hum Reprod. 2014 Sep;29(9):1978-86. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu152. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
4
National survey of donor-conceived individuals who requested information about their sperm donor-experiences from 17 years of identity releases in Sweden.对 17 年来从瑞典的身份信息发布中要求了解其精子捐赠者经历的供精所生孩子的全国性调查。
Hum Reprod. 2022 Mar 1;37(3):510-521. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab275.
5
The views of semen donors regarding the Swedish Insemination Act 1984.精液捐赠者对1984年瑞典授精法案的看法。
Med Law Int. 1998;3(2-3):117-34. doi: 10.1177/096853329800300302.
6
Semen providers and their three families.精液提供者及其三个家庭。
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Mar;26(1):15-22. doi: 10.1080/01443610400022975.
7
Psychosocial aspects of donor insemination. Sperm donors--their motivations and attitudes to artificial insemination.供精人工授精的社会心理因素。精子捐献者——他们的动机及对人工授精的态度。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994 Oct;73(9):701-5. doi: 10.3109/00016349409029407.
8
Secrecy: an unresolved issue in the practice of donor insemination.保密:供精人工授精实践中一个未解决的问题。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Jun;168(6 Pt 1):1846-9; discussion 1849-51. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90700-s.
9
Sperm donor recruitment, attitudes and provider practices--5 years after the removal of donor anonymity.捐精者招募、态度和提供者实践——取消捐精者匿名制 5 年后。
Hum Reprod. 2013 Mar;28(3):676-82. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des450. Epub 2013 Jan 12.
10
Disclosure of donor insemination to the child: the impact of Swedish legislation on couples' attitudes.向孩子披露供精人工授精情况:瑞典法律对夫妇态度的影响。
Hum Reprod. 2000 Sep;15(9):2052-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.9.2052.

引用本文的文献

1
An Evaluation of Iranian Judges' Decisions about The Act of Embryo Donation.对伊朗法官关于胚胎捐赠行为裁决的评估。
Int J Fertil Steril. 2015 Jul-Sep;9(2):254-60. doi: 10.22074/ijfs.2015.4248. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
2
The reduction of sperm donor candidates due to the abolition of the anonymity rule: analysis of an argument.由于匿名规则的废除导致精子捐献候选者数量减少:一项论证分析
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2001 Nov;18(11):617-22. doi: 10.1023/a:1013169207315.
3
Privacy versus disclosure in gamete donation: a clash of interest, of duties, or an exercise in responsibility?
配子捐赠中的隐私与信息披露:利益冲突、职责冲突还是责任践行?
J Assist Reprod Genet. 1997 Aug;14(7):371-3. doi: 10.1007/BF02766140.
4
Reasons for rejecting potential donors from a sperm bank program.精子库项目拒绝潜在捐赠者的原因。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 1997 Jul;14(6):354-60. doi: 10.1007/BF02765841.