Massoud T F, Turjman F, Ji C, Viñuela F, Guglielmi G, Gobin Y P, Duckwiler G R
Endovascular Therapy Service, University of California at Los Angeles Medical Center 90024, USA.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1995 Nov-Dec;16(10):1953-63.
To assess the biomechanical feasibility of treating experimental fusiform aneurysms endovascularly with a combination of stents and coils.
An experimental model was surgically constructed in the necks of nine swine to simulate intracranial fusiform aneurysms possessing important "perforators" or side branches. Balloon-expandable metal stents were positioned across the aneurysms in eight swine. In five of these, additional treatment was intraaneurysmal placement of detachable microcoils. Attempts were made to deposit these coils strategically away from the origin of the side branch.
Stent placement was successful in seven swine but failed in one swine because of stent-aneurysm size mismatch. Two swine treated with only stents showed no significant alterations in blood filling of the aneurysm or side branch. Satisfactory coil placement (outside the stent, within the aneurysm sac, and away from the orifice of the side branch) was achieved in four of the five swine treated with stents and coils. Careful fluoroscopic monitoring and controlled coil delivery were necessary to avoid covering the sidebranch origin. These aneurysms could not be packed densely after detachment of the first coil because of the resultant radiographic overlap of multiple coil loops on the stent and its lumen in all projections. In one swine there was inadvertent untoward reentry of the coil tip into the expanded stent lumen during its delivery.
Endovascular treatment of experimental fusiforms aneurysms using stents and coils is technically feasible. The stent maintains patency of the parent artery while allowing strategic coil placement in the aneurysm sac away from the origin of side branches. This technique may prove useful in the future treatment of intracranial fusiform aneurysms. However, potential sources of technical difficulties have been identified, and further longterm studies using an appropriate intracranial stent will be necessary before human application.
评估使用支架和弹簧圈联合进行血管内治疗实验性梭形动脉瘤的生物力学可行性。
通过手术在9头猪的颈部构建实验模型,以模拟具有重要“穿支”或侧支的颅内梭形动脉瘤。在8头猪中,将球囊扩张式金属支架放置在动脉瘤处。其中5头猪,额外进行了动脉瘤内可脱性微弹簧圈置入。尝试将这些弹簧圈策略性地放置在远离侧支起源处。
7头猪成功置入支架,但1头猪因支架与动脉瘤大小不匹配而失败。仅接受支架治疗的2头猪,动脉瘤或侧支的血液充盈情况无明显改变。在接受支架和弹簧圈治疗的5头猪中,4头猪的弹簧圈放置满意(在支架外、动脉瘤腔内且远离侧支开口)。需要仔细的荧光透视监测和控制弹簧圈输送,以避免覆盖侧支起源。由于在所有投影中多个弹簧圈圈环在支架及其管腔内产生的放射学重叠,第一个弹簧圈脱落后这些动脉瘤无法被紧密填塞。在1头猪中,弹簧圈尖端在输送过程中意外再次进入扩张的支架管腔。
使用支架和弹簧圈对实验性梭形动脉瘤进行血管内治疗在技术上是可行的。支架维持母动脉通畅,并允许在动脉瘤腔内将弹簧圈策略性地放置在远离侧支起源处。该技术可能在未来颅内梭形动脉瘤的治疗中证明有用。然而,已确定了潜在的技术困难来源,在应用于人体之前,需要使用合适的颅内支架进行进一步长期研究。