Didier E S, Orenstein J M, Aldras A, Bertucci D, Rogers L B, Janney F A
Department of Microbiology, Tulane Regional Primate Research Center, Covington, Louisiana 70433, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Dec;33(12):3138-45. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.12.3138-3145.1995.
Calcofluor white 2MR, modified trichrome blue, and indirect immunofluorescent antibody (IFA) staining methods were evaluated and compared for detecting microsporidia in stool. Serial 10-fold dilutions of Encephalitozoon (Septata) intestinalis were prepared in three formalinized stool specimens or in Tris-buffered saline. Ten-microliter aliquots were smeared onto glass slides, fixed with methanol, stained, and read by at least three individuals. The results indicated that the calcofluor stain was the most sensitive method, required approximately 15 min to perform, but did generate some false-positive results due to similarly staining small yeast cells. The modified trichrome blue stain was nearly as sensitive as the calcofluor stain and allowed for easier distinction between microsporidia and yeast cells. This stain, however, required approximately 60 min to perform. The IFA stain with polyclonal murine antiserum against E. intestinalis was the least sensitive of the methods and required approximately 130 min to perform. The lower limit of detection with the calcofluor and modified trichrome stains was a concentration of about 500 organisms in 10 microliters of stool to detect one microsporidian after viewing 50 fields at a final magnification of x1,000. Reliability was also addressed by use of 74 stool, urine, and intestinal fluid specimens, 50 of which were confirmed for the presence of microsporidia by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). All TEM-positive specimens were detected by calcofluor and modified trichrome blue staining. Ten specimens were not detected by the IFA stain. An additional seven TEM-negative specimens were read positive for microsporidia with the calcofluor stain, and of these, five also were read positive with the modified trichrome blue stain. The resulting diagnostic paradigm was to screen specimens with the calcofluor stain and to confirm the results with the modified trichrome stain. IFA, which was less sensitive, may become useful for microsporidian species identification as specific antibodies become available.
对荧光增白剂2MR、改良三色蓝染色法和间接免疫荧光抗体(IFA)染色法进行了评估和比较,以检测粪便中的微孢子虫。在三个经福尔马林固定的粪便标本或Tris缓冲盐溶液中制备肠道脑炎微孢子虫(Septata)的10倍系列稀释液。取10微升等分试样涂抹在载玻片上,用甲醇固定,染色,并由至少三人进行判读。结果表明,荧光增白剂染色是最敏感的方法,操作大约需要15分钟,但由于小酵母细胞也有类似染色,确实会产生一些假阳性结果。改良三色蓝染色几乎与荧光增白剂染色一样敏感,并且更容易区分微孢子虫和酵母细胞。然而,这种染色操作大约需要60分钟。使用针对肠道脑炎微孢子虫的多克隆鼠抗血清进行的IFA染色是这些方法中最不敏感的,操作大约需要130分钟。荧光增白剂和改良三色蓝染色的检测下限是在10微升粪便中约500个生物体的浓度,在最终放大倍数为1000倍下观察50个视野后检测到一个微孢子虫。还通过使用74份粪便、尿液和肠液标本探讨了可靠性,其中50份通过透射电子显微镜(TEM)确认存在微孢子虫。所有TEM阳性标本均通过荧光增白剂和改良三色蓝染色检测到。10份标本未通过IFA染色检测到。另外7份TEM阴性标本经荧光增白剂染色判读为微孢子虫阳性,其中5份经改良三色蓝染色也判读为阳性。由此产生的诊断模式是先用荧光增白剂染色筛查标本,再用改良三色蓝染色确认结果。随着特异性抗体的出现,不太敏感的IFA可能对微孢子虫种类鉴定有用。