• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[医疗事故诉讼中的专家证词]

[Expert testimony in malpractice suits].

作者信息

Deutsch E

机构信息

Universität Göttingen, Juristisches Seminar.

出版信息

Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1995 Nov;89(6):581-4.

PMID:8588427
Abstract

As part of his professional activities, every physician has the right, and--if he is appointed by a court of law as an expert witness according to sec. 407 ZPO, 75 StPO--even the duty to write expert opinions. An expert witness has the same privileges not to testify as any other witness. The expert opinion has to contain only information about the basics and the standards of the expert's field as well as informing about the necessity of each step of the medical treatment. He is not up to the expert to answer legal questions or decide the question of negligence. In case of a culpable violation of the duty to provide a correct expert opinion, there may result a liability for a wrong expert opinion.

摘要

作为其职业活动的一部分,每位医生都有权——如果根据《德国民事诉讼法典》第407条、《德国刑事诉讼法典》第75条被法院指定为专家证人——甚至有义务撰写专家意见。专家证人享有与任何其他证人相同的免予作证的特权。专家意见必须仅包含有关专家领域的基础知识和标准的信息,以及说明医疗治疗每一步骤的必要性。回答法律问题或判定过失问题并非专家的职责。如果因过失违反提供正确专家意见的义务,可能会导致对错误专家意见承担责任。

相似文献

1
[Expert testimony in malpractice suits].[医疗事故诉讼中的专家证词]
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1995 Nov;89(6):581-4.
2
Expert testimony: a perspective from the trenches.专家证词:来自实际工作的视角。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2005 Feb;2(2):126-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2004.06.003.
3
[Remarks about the position of the medico-legal expert in imperative regulations in the Penal and Civil Codes].[关于刑法典和民法典中强制性规定里法医学专家的地位的论述]
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2005 Oct-Dec;55(4):268-72.
4
[The faulty expert's opinion in medical liability process (author's transl)].医疗责任程序中错误专家意见(作者译)
HNO. 1980 May;28(5):148-52.
5
[Medical expert assessment in the Anglo-American lawsuit].[英美诉讼中的医学专家评估]
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1996 Nov;90(7):648-52.
6
[Medical expert assessment in civil rights from the legal viewpoint].[从法律视角看民权领域的医学专家评估]
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1996 Nov;90(7):570-4.
7
[Medical expert assessment in civil and criminal law--stand for evaluating medical expert assessment].[民法和刑法中的医学专家评估——代表对医学专家评估的评估]
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1996 Nov;90(7):592-6.
8
[Drafting expert opinion reports in medical liability processes].[撰写医疗责任程序中的专家意见报告]
Anaesthesist. 2011 Dec;60(12):1146-51. doi: 10.1007/s00101-011-1893-0.
9
[Expert evidence. General prerequisites and procedural characteristics for expert opinions].[专家证据。专家意见的一般前提条件和程序特征]
Anaesthesist. 2005 Nov;54(11):1081-8. doi: 10.1007/s00101-005-0934-y.
10
[Status and function of the anesthesiologic expert witness in the malpractice process].[麻醉专家证人在医疗事故处理过程中的地位与作用]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 1995 Feb;30(1):55-60; discussion 60-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-996449.