• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人的人工耳蜗植入

Cochlear implantation in the elderly.

作者信息

Kelsall D C, Shallop J K, Burnelli T

机构信息

Denver Ear Associates, Englewood, CO 80110, USA.

出版信息

Am J Otol. 1995 Sep;16(5):609-15.

PMID:8588665
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the audiologic and surgical results of elderly patients receiving cochlear implants with other adult patients, and to evaluate the benefit of cochlear implantation in the geriatric population. Twenty-eight patients, aged 60 to 80 years, who received the Nucleus 22 channel cochlear implant were studied retrospectively. Mean audiologic test scores increased significantly after implantation. Postoperative audiologic test scores of this elderly population are comparable to those of a matched group of younger adult patients. The surgical procedure was well tolerated in all elderly patients, and there were two postoperative complications requiring revision procedures. A questionnaire was used to assess implant use and the impact of cochlear implantation on the quality of life in this elderly population. Average implant use per day was 13.8 hours, and 65% of patients were able to recognize voices over the telephone. More than 80% of patients believed that their quality of life had improved significantly, that their self-confidence had increased, and that their decision regarding implantation was correct. The results of this study indicate that elderly patients with bilateral, profound, sensorineural hearing loss should not be denied consideration for cochlear implantation based on age alone.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较接受人工耳蜗植入的老年患者与其他成年患者的听力学和手术结果,并评估人工耳蜗植入对老年人群的益处。对28例年龄在60至80岁之间接受Nucleus 22通道人工耳蜗植入的患者进行了回顾性研究。植入后平均听力学测试分数显著提高。该老年人群的术后听力学测试分数与一组匹配的年轻成年患者相当。所有老年患者对手术过程耐受性良好,有两例术后并发症需要进行修复手术。使用问卷调查来评估人工耳蜗的使用情况以及人工耳蜗植入对该老年人群生活质量的影响。每天平均使用人工耳蜗的时间为13.8小时,65%的患者能够通过电话识别声音。超过80%的患者认为他们的生活质量有显著改善,自信心增强,并且他们关于植入的决定是正确的。本研究结果表明,双侧重度感音神经性听力损失的老年患者不应仅基于年龄而被拒绝考虑人工耳蜗植入。

相似文献

1
Cochlear implantation in the elderly.老年人的人工耳蜗植入
Am J Otol. 1995 Sep;16(5):609-15.
2
Cochlear implants in elderly people: preliminary results.老年人人工耳蜗植入:初步结果。
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2004 May(552):64-7.
3
Cochlear implantation in patients with substantial residual hearing.为有大量残余听力的患者植入人工耳蜗。
Laryngoscope. 2004 Dec;114(12):2218-23. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000149462.88327.7f.
4
Speech perception in elderly patients following cochlear implantation.老年人工耳蜗植入患者的言语感知
Acta Otolaryngol. 2005 Dec;125(12):1272-6. doi: 10.1080/00016480510044214.
5
Cochlear implant surgery in patients more than seventy-nine years old.79岁以上患者的人工耳蜗植入手术。
Laryngoscope. 2009 Jun;119(6):1180-3. doi: 10.1002/lary.20182.
6
OCTO "Outcomes of cochlear implant for the octogenarians: audiologic and quality-of-life".八旬老人人工耳蜗植入的效果:听力学和生活质量评估。
Otol Neurotol. 2014 Jan;35(1):22-8. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182a5d113.
7
Cochlear implant performance in senior citizens.老年人的人工耳蜗植入效果
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000 Oct;123(4):419-24. doi: 10.1067/mhn.2000.109759.
8
Otologics fully implantable hearing system: Phase I trial 1-year results.Otologics全植入式听力系统:I期试验1年结果。
Otol Neurotol. 2008 Jun;29(4):534-41. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181656969.
9
Implication of central asymmetry in speech processing on selecting the ear for cochlear implantation.言语加工中的中枢不对称性对人工耳蜗植入耳选择的影响
Otol Neurotol. 2007 Jan;28(1):25-30. doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000244365.24449.00.
10
Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.成人双侧人工耳蜗植入后的主观和客观结果。
Otol Neurotol. 2009 Apr;30(3):313-8. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31819bd7e6.

引用本文的文献

1
Atrophy of cerebellum Crus I indicates poor outcome of cochlear implantation in the elderly.小脑脚I萎缩表明老年人人工耳蜗植入效果不佳。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 24;15(1):3057. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78322-5.
2
[Assessment of speech perception and quality of life after cochlear implant in postlingual deaf adults].[语后聋成人人工耳蜗植入术后言语感知及生活质量评估]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Nov;34(11):1002-1004. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2020.11.010.
3
Age-Related Changes in Temporal Resolution Revisited: Electrophysiological and Behavioral Findings From Cochlear Implant Users.
重新探讨年龄相关的时间分辨率变化:来自人工耳蜗使用者的电生理和行为学发现。
Ear Hear. 2019 Nov/Dec;40(6):1328-1344. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000732.
4
Is age a limiting factor for adaptation to cochlear implant?年龄是人工耳蜗植入适应的限制因素吗?
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Sep;273(9):2495-502. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3849-5. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
5
Using the HISQUI29 to assess the sound quality levels of Spanish adults with unilateral cochlear implants and no contralateral hearing.使用HISQUI29评估单侧人工耳蜗植入且对侧无听力的西班牙成年人的声音质量水平。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Sep;273(9):2343-53. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3789-0. Epub 2015 Oct 6.
6
Quality of life and audiologic performance through the ability to phone of cochlear implant users.通过人工耳蜗使用者的打电话能力评估生活质量和听力表现。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Dec;272(12):3685-92. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3448-x. Epub 2014 Dec 20.
7
Perception of speech produced by native and nonnative talkers by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with cochlear implants.正常听力者和人工耳蜗植入者对母语者和非母语者说话者所产生的语音感知。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Apr 1;57(2):532-54. doi: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-H-12-0404.
8
Long-term use of cochlear implants in older adults: results from a large consecutive case series.老年人长期使用人工耳蜗:一项大型连续病例系列研究结果。
Otol Neurotol. 2014 Jun;35(5):815-20. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000327.
9
Is cochlear implantation a good treatment method for profoundly deafened elderly?人工耳蜗植入对于极重度聋的老年人来说是一种好的治疗方法吗?
Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:1339-46. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S50698. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
10
The effects of cochlear implantation on quality of life in the elderly.人工耳蜗植入对老年人生活质量的影响。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Jan;271(1):65-73. doi: 10.1007/s00405-013-2396-1. Epub 2013 Feb 15.