Atri J, Falshaw M, Linvingstone A, Robson J
Health Eastenders Project, Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Medical Colleges of St Bartholomew's and the London Hospitals, Queen Mary and Westfield College, London.
BMJ. 1996 Mar 9;312(7031):614-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7031.614.
To describe the association of ethnic and socioeconomic status with recording of preventive care information by selected general practitioners.
Random selection of people aged 20-64 registered with 43 general practitioners. Ethnic and social characteristics of stratified samples were determined at interview in the subject's home. Recording of preventive information was ascertained from general practitioners' medical records.
Inner London borough of Tower Hamlets.
505 ut of 739 people confirmed as residents at their home address (190 white, 86 black, 112 Bangladeshi, 105 Chinese or Vietnamese, 12 other).
Socioeconomic characteristics, consultation with general practitioner, and recorded preventive activities for ethnic groups.
Minority ethnic groups were considerably more disadvantaged than white people and five times more likely to be overcrowded (31% v 6%), three times less likely to own their own home(11% v 37%), twice as likely to be in social classes IV and V (54% v 28%) and less likely to be employed (34% v 63%). There were no significant differences between white, black, Bangladeshi, and Chinese or Vietnamese subjects in recording smoking, blood pressure, alcohol consumption, weight, and height in the general practitioners' medical records. White women were more likely to have a record of mammography (46% v 20%; P=0.03) and of cervical smears than women in minority ethnic groups.
Despite major socioeconomic inequity, equitable recording of preventive activity for the major causes of death for white, black and Bangladeshi populations is possible. Chinese and Vietnamese people had lower levels of recording and consultation. Mammography and, to a lesser extent, cervical cytology are inequitably recorded and require additional support at practice level.
描述特定全科医生记录预防性保健信息与种族及社会经济地位之间的关联。
从43位全科医生登记的20至64岁人群中随机抽样。通过在受试者家中进行访谈确定分层样本的种族和社会特征。从全科医生的病历中确定预防性信息的记录情况。
伦敦塔哈姆雷特市内城区。
在其家庭住址被确认为居民的739人中的505人(190名白人、86名黑人、112名孟加拉人、105名中国人或越南人、12名其他种族)。
社会经济特征、与全科医生的诊疗咨询以及不同种族群体记录的预防性活动。
少数族裔群体相比白人处于明显更不利的地位,住房过度拥挤的可能性高出五倍(31%对6%),拥有自有住房的可能性低三倍(11%对37%),处于社会阶层IV和V的可能性高出一倍(54%对28%),就业可能性更低(34%对63%)。在全科医生的病历中,白人、黑人、孟加拉人以及中国人或越南人在记录吸烟、血压、饮酒量、体重和身高方面没有显著差异。白人女性比少数族裔女性更有可能有乳房X光检查记录(46%对20%;P=0.03)以及宫颈涂片记录。
尽管存在重大的社会经济不平等,但对于白人、黑人和孟加拉人群体的主要死因,仍有可能公平地记录预防性活动。中国人和越南人的记录及诊疗咨询水平较低。乳房X光检查以及在较小程度上的宫颈细胞学检查记录存在不公平现象,在实践层面需要额外支持。