Saitoh Y, Fujii Y, Toyooka H, Amaha K
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Japan.
Can J Anaesth. 1995 Dec;42(12):1096-100. doi: 10.1007/BF03015095.
The purpose of this study was to compare the pattern of recovery from vecuronium 0.07 mg.kg-1 induced neuromuscular blockade using post-tetanic burst count (PTBC)-(three short tetanic bursts of 0.2 msec duration every 20 msec given every second following a tetanus), and post-tetanic count (PTC)-(0.2 msec single twitch stimuli given every second following a tetanus) using an accelerometer in 60 adult patients during nitrous oxide-oxygen-isoflurane anaesthesia. In addition, the relationship among PTBC, PTC, and T1 (the 1st response in the train-of-four (TOF) stimulation) was examined to investigate whether the PTBC had an advantage over the PTC or TOF for evaluating intense neuromuscular blockade. The PTBC was greater than PTC during the 15-35 min after the administration of vecuronium (unpaired t test with Bonferroni's correction, P < 0.05). Time to the return of PTB response was shorter than that of PTT (17.7 +/- 3.2 vs 22.7 +/- 3.7 min, unpaired t test, P = 0.0005). Time from the return of PTB to that of T1 was longer than the time from the return of PTC to that of T1 (13.3 +/- 2.6 vs 9.2 +/- 2.8 min, unpaired t test, P = 0.0003). At the return of T1, PTBC was greater than PTC (14.3 +/- 6.9 vs 9.4 +/- 2.3, unpaired t test, P = 0.0153). These results suggest that, using PTBC, a more profound level of neuromuscular blockade can be evaluated than that using PTC.
本研究的目的是比较在氧化亚氮 - 氧气 - 异氟烷麻醉期间,使用强直后爆发计数(PTBC)(在一次强直刺激后,每隔1秒给予3次持续时间为0.2毫秒、间隔20毫秒的短强直刺激)和强直后计数(PTC)(在一次强直刺激后,每隔1秒给予0.2毫秒的单次颤搐刺激)来评估60例成年患者维库溴铵0.07 mg·kg⁻¹诱导的神经肌肉阻滞恢复模式。此外,研究PTBC、PTC和T1(四个成串刺激(TOF)中的第一个反应)之间的关系,以探讨PTBC在评估深度神经肌肉阻滞方面是否优于PTC或TOF。维库溴铵给药后15 - 35分钟内,PTBC大于PTC(采用Bonferroni校正的非配对t检验,P < 0.05)。PTB反应恢复时间短于PTT(17.7 ± 3.2分钟对22.7 ± 3.7分钟,非配对t检验,P = 0.0005)。从PTB恢复到T1的时间长于从PTC恢复到T1的时间(13.3 ± 2.6分钟对9.2 ± 2.8分钟,非配对t检验,P = 0.0003)。在T1恢复时,PTBC大于PTC(14.3 ± 6.9对9.4 ± 2.3,非配对t检验,P = 0.0153)。这些结果表明,使用PTBC比使用PTC能够评估更深程度的神经肌肉阻滞。