Suppr超能文献

产前检查次数对低风险孕妇围产期结局的影响。一项随机对照试验。

Effect of frequency of prenatal care visits on perinatal outcome among low-risk women. A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

McDuffie R S, Beck A, Bischoff K, Cross J, Orleans M

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaiser Permanente, Denver, CO 80205, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 1996 Mar 20;275(11):847-51.

PMID:8596222
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In 1989, the Expert Panel on the Content of Prenatal Care established guidelines on the timing and content of prenatal care, including a schedule consisting of fewer prenatal visits than traditionally provided, for women at low risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. We tested the hypothesis that there are no significant increases in adverse perinatal outcomes when low-risk women are seen in a prenatal care visit schedule of fewer visits than routinely advised.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Group-model health maintenance organization.

PATIENTS

A total of 2764 pregnant women, judged to be at low risk of adverse perinatal outcomes.

INTERVENTIONS

Following risk assessment, participants were randomly assigned to an experimental schedule (nine visits) or a control schedule (14 visits) with additional visits as indicated or as desired by the patient.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Preterm delivery, preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, low birth weight and patient's satisfaction with care.

RESULTS

On average, there were 2.7 fewer visits observed in the experimental group than in the control group. There were no significant increases in the main outcomes of the experimental group; preterm delivery (relative risk [RR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92 to 1.27; P = .19), preeclampsia (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.14, P = .74), cesarean delivery (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.17; P = .25), and low birth weight (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.12; P = .76). There were no differences between the two groups in patients' satisfaction with quality of prenatal care.

CONCLUSION

In this study, good perinatal outcomes and patient satisfaction were maintained when the prenatal visit schedule proposed by the Expert Panel on the Content of Prenatal Care was observed.

摘要

目的

1989年,产前护理内容专家小组制定了产前护理的时间安排和内容指南,其中包括一个产前检查次数比传统安排更少的时间表,适用于围产期不良结局风险较低的女性。我们检验了这样一个假设:当低风险女性按照比常规建议更少的产前检查时间表进行检查时,围产期不良结局不会显著增加。

设计

随机对照试验。

地点

团体模式健康维护组织。

患者

共有2764名孕妇,判定为围产期不良结局低风险。

干预措施

在风险评估后,参与者被随机分配到实验时间表组(9次检查)或对照组(14次检查),并根据指示或患者需求进行额外检查。

主要结局指标

早产、子痫前期、剖宫产、低出生体重以及患者对护理的满意度。

结果

平均而言,实验组的检查次数比对照组少2.7次。实验组的主要结局指标没有显著增加;早产(相对风险[RR],1.08;95%置信区间[CI],0.92至1.27;P = 0.19),子痫前期(RR,0.94;95% CI,0.78至1.14,P = 0.74),剖宫产(RR,1.04;95% CI,0.93至1.17;P = 0.25),以及低出生体重(RR,0.94;95% CI,0.78至1.12;P = 0.76)。两组患者对产前护理质量的满意度没有差异。

结论

在本研究中,遵循产前护理内容专家小组提出的产前检查时间表时,围产期结局良好且患者满意度得以维持。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验