Suppr超能文献

全科医生对急性背痛的管理:已报告的实践与临床指南的比较调查。

General practitioners' management of acute back pain: a survey of reported practice compared with clinical guidelines.

作者信息

Little P, Smith L, Cantrell T, Chapman J, Langridge J, Pickering R

机构信息

Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, Health, and Biological Sciences, University of Southampton.

出版信息

BMJ. 1996 Feb 24;312(7029):485-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7029.485.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare general practitioners' reported management of acute back pain with 'evidence based' guidelines for its management.

DESIGN

Confidential postal questionnaire.

SETTING

One health district in the South and West region.

SUBJECTS

236 general practitioners; 166 (70%) responded.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Examination routinely performed, 'danger' symptoms and signs warranting urgent referral, advice given, and satisfaction with management.

RESULTS

A minority of general practitioners do not examine reflexes routinely (27%, 95% confidence interval 20% to 34%), and a majority do not examine routinely for muscle weakness or sensation. Although most would refer patients with danger signs, some would not seek urgent advice for saddle anaesthesia (6%, 3% to 11%), extensor plantar response (45%, 37% to 53%), or neurological signs at multiple levels (15%, 10% to 21%). A minority do not give advice about back exercises (42%, 34% to 49%), fitness (34%, 26% to 41%), or everyday activities. A minority performed manipulation (20%) or acupuncture (6%). One third rated their satisfaction with management of back pain as 4 out of 10 or less.

CONCLUSIONS

The management of back pain by general practitioners does not match the guidelines, but there is little evidence from general practice for many of the recommendations, including routine examination, activity modification, educational advice, and back exercises. General practitioners need to be more aware of danger symptoms and of the benefits of early mobilisation and possibly of manipulation for persisting symptoms. Guidelines should reference each recommendation and discuss study methodology and the setting of evidence.

摘要

目的

比较全科医生报告的急性背痛管理方法与基于“证据”的管理指南。

设计

保密邮寄问卷。

地点

西南部地区的一个健康区。

研究对象

236名全科医生;166名(70%)做出回应。

观察指标

常规进行的检查、需要紧急转诊的“危险”症状和体征、给予的建议以及对管理的满意度。

结果

少数全科医生不常规检查反射(27%,95%置信区间20%至34%),大多数不常规检查肌肉力量或感觉。虽然大多数人会转诊有危险体征的患者,但有些人不会为鞍区感觉缺失(6%,3%至11%)、跖伸肌反应(45%,37%至53%)或多个节段的神经体征寻求紧急建议(15%,10%至21%)。少数人不提供关于背部锻炼(42%,34%至49%)、健康状况(34%,26%至41%)或日常活动的建议。少数人进行手法治疗(20%)或针灸(6%)。三分之一的人对背痛管理的满意度评分为4分或更低。

结论

全科医生对背痛的管理与指南不符,但从全科医疗中几乎没有证据支持许多建议,包括常规检查、活动调整、教育建议和背部锻炼。全科医生需要更加了解危险症状以及早期活动的益处,可能还需要了解手法治疗对持续症状的作用。指南应引用每项建议并讨论研究方法和证据背景。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

9
TRPV1 expression in acupuncture points: response to electroacupuncture stimulation.穴位中 TRPV1 的表达:对电针刺激的反应。
J Chem Neuroanat. 2011 Apr;41(3):129-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2011.01.001. Epub 2011 Jan 20.

本文引用的文献

2
Low back pain.腰痛
BMJ. 1993 Apr 3;306(6882):901-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6882.901.
3
Simple low back pain: rest or active exercise?单纯性下腰痛:休息还是积极运动?
Ann Rheum Dis. 1993 May;52(5):317-9. doi: 10.1136/ard.52.5.317.
9
Clinical guidelines in 1994.1994年的临床指南。
BMJ. 1994 Dec 3;309(6967):1457-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6967.1457.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验