• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优化用于钛椎弓根螺钉脊柱磁共振评估的成像参数。

Optimizing imaging parameters for MR evaluation of the spine with titanium pedicle screws.

作者信息

Petersilge C A, Lewin J S, Duerk J L, Yoo J U, Ghaneyem A J

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, OH 44106, USA.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 May;166(5):1213-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.166.5.8615272.

DOI:10.2214/ajr.166.5.8615272
PMID:8615272
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the contribution and interdependence of multiple imaging parameters in clinical imaging sequences to aid practicing radiologists in minimizing artifacts during MR imaging of the spine after implantation of titanium pedicle screws.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A lumbar spine specimen with titanium pedicle screws implanted in the pedicle was imaged with a 1.5-T scanner. Sequence type, voxel volume, TE, and bandwidth varied. Different voxel volumes were achieved by altering section thickness, field of view (FOV), and matrix size. Artifact size was measured on sagittal and axial images at the midpedicle level. Artifact size was expressed as a percentage of actual screw size, and mean artifact size was calculated for each sequence. Analysis of variance without replication was done.

RESULTS

Mean artifact size ranged from 231% to 364% of actual screw size. Artifact size was independent of voxel volume for voxels greater than 3 MM3 (p<.001). Artifact size decreased significantly (p<.001) when voxel volume was less than 1 mm3. When we increased slice thickness and maintained a constant voxel volume, artifact size decreased. Decreases in artifact size correlated with a reduction in the ratio of the FOV to the number of pixels in the frequency-encoding direction (Nx). Artifact sizes were smallest when fast spin-echo sequences were used. Conventional spin-echo sequences produced artifacts that were smaller than the artifacts produced by the gradient-echo sequences. Decreasing the TE did not diminish artifact size for conventional spin-echo images in larger voxel volume.

CONCLUSION

Although voxel volume has been recognized as a factor that affects artifact size, the role of other contributing factors--slice thickness, number of phase-encoding steps, and FOV/Nx--has not been evaluated before. Artifact reduction proved to be dependent only on FOV/Nx. Artifact size was reduced by the use of fast spin-echo sequences. With conventional spin-echo sequences, TE should be minimized, although other technical factors may outweigh the gain in artifact reduction.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨了临床成像序列中多个成像参数的作用及相互依赖性,以帮助执业放射科医生在钛椎弓根螺钉植入术后的脊柱磁共振成像中尽量减少伪影。

材料与方法

使用1.5-T扫描仪对植入椎弓根钛椎弓根螺钉的腰椎标本进行成像。序列类型、体素体积、回波时间(TE)和带宽各不相同。通过改变层厚、视野(FOV)和矩阵大小获得不同的体素体积。在椎弓根中部水平的矢状面和轴位图像上测量伪影大小。伪影大小以实际螺钉大小的百分比表示,并计算每个序列的平均伪影大小。进行无重复方差分析。

结果

平均伪影大小为实际螺钉大小的231%至364%。对于大于3立方毫米的体素,伪影大小与体素体积无关(p<0.001)。当体素体积小于1立方毫米时,伪影大小显著降低(p<0.001)。当我们增加层厚并保持体素体积恒定时,伪影大小降低。伪影大小的降低与视野与频率编码方向上像素数量之比(Nx)的降低相关。使用快速自旋回波序列时伪影大小最小。传统自旋回波序列产生的伪影小于梯度回波序列产生的伪影。对于较大体素体积的传统自旋回波图像,降低TE并不能减小伪影大小。

结论

尽管体素体积已被认为是影响伪影大小的一个因素,但其他影响因素——层厚、相位编码步数和FOV/Nx——的作用此前尚未得到评估。事实证明,减少伪影仅取决于FOV/Nx。使用快速自旋回波序列可减小伪影大小。对于传统自旋回波序列,应尽量减小TE,尽管其他技术因素可能比减少伪影带来的益处更重要。

相似文献

1
Optimizing imaging parameters for MR evaluation of the spine with titanium pedicle screws.优化用于钛椎弓根螺钉脊柱磁共振评估的成像参数。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 May;166(5):1213-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.166.5.8615272.
2
Minimizing artifacts caused by metallic implants at MR imaging: experimental and clinical studies.磁共振成像中减少金属植入物引起的伪影:实验与临床研究
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Nov;171(5):1207-13. doi: 10.2214/ajr.171.5.9798849.
3
Cardiac MRI: comparison between single-shot fast spin echo and conventional spin echo sequences in the morphological evaluation of the ventricles.心脏磁共振成像:单次激发快速自旋回波与传统自旋回波序列在心室形态学评估中的比较
Radiol Med. 2002 Jan-Feb;103(1-2):34-44.
4
[Influence of sequence type on the extent of the susceptibility artifact in MRI--a shoulder specimen study after suture anchor repair].[序列类型对MRI中磁化率伪影程度的影响——缝合锚钉修复后的肩部标本研究]
Rofo. 2004 Sep;176(9):1296-301. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-813404.
5
Evaluation of MR issues for the latest standard brands of orthopedic metal implants: plates and screws.对最新标准品牌的骨科金属植入物(钢板和螺钉)的磁共振成像相关问题评估
Eur J Radiol. 2015 Mar;84(3):450-457. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.12.001. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
6
[Options for the reduction of magnetic susceptibility artifacts caused by implanted microchips in 0.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging].[0.5特斯拉磁共振成像中减少植入微芯片所致磁敏感性伪影的方法]
Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere. 2015;43(2):83-92. doi: 10.15654/TPK-140663. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
7
Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging artifact with cobalt-chromium versus titanium spinal instrumentation: presented at the 2013 Joint Spine Section Meeting. Clinical article.钴铬与钛脊柱内固定术后磁共振成像伪影:在 2013 年脊柱联合分会会议上发表。临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Nov;19(5):629-36. doi: 10.3171/2013.7.SPINE1359. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
8
Usefulness of slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC) for reducing metallic artifacts in 3-T MRI.用于减少 3T MRI 中金属伪影的切片编码金属伪影校正(SEMAC)的实用性。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Jun;31(5):703-6. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.11.004. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
9
Comparison of metal artifact reduction techniques in magnetic resonance imaging of carbon-reinforced PEEK and titanium spinal implants.碳纤维增强聚醚醚酮和钛脊柱植入物磁共振成像中金属伪影降低技术的比较。
Acta Radiol. 2022 Aug;63(8):1062-1070. doi: 10.1177/02841851211029077. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
10
A comparative study of MR imaging profile of titanium pedicle screws.钛椎弓根螺钉的磁共振成像特征比较研究
Acta Radiol. 2001 May;42(3):291-3. doi: 10.1080/028418501127346846.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantifying the effect of posterior spinal instrumentation on the MRI signal of adjacent intervertebral discs.量化后路脊柱内固定对相邻椎间盘MRI信号的影响。
Spine Deform. 2020 Oct;8(5):845-851. doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00139-9. Epub 2020 May 24.
2
[Modern radiological diagnostics in spine surgery].[脊柱外科中的现代放射诊断学]
Orthopade. 2019 Jan;48(1):5-43. doi: 10.1007/s00132-018-03672-8.
3
Comparisons of slice-encoding metal artifact correction and view-angle tilting magnetic resonance imaging and traditional digital radiography in evaluating chronic hip pain after total hip arthroplasty.
在评估全髋关节置换术后慢性髋部疼痛方面,对切片编码金属伪影校正和视角倾斜磁共振成像与传统数字X线摄影的比较。
J Orthop Translat. 2017 Dec 20;12:45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2017.11.002. eCollection 2018 Jan.
4
Imaging of post-surgical treatment and of related complications in spinal trauma.脊柱创伤术后治疗及相关并发症的影像学检查
Musculoskelet Surg. 2017 Mar;101(Suppl 1):63-73. doi: 10.1007/s12306-017-0457-0. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
5
An illustrative review to understand and manage metal-induced artifacts in musculoskeletal MRI: a primer and updates.一篇关于理解和处理肌肉骨骼MRI中金属诱导伪影的说明性综述:入门知识与更新
Skeletal Radiol. 2016 May;45(5):677-88. doi: 10.1007/s00256-016-2338-2. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
6
Metal artifact reduction in patients with dental implants using multispectral three-dimensional data acquisition for hybrid PET/MRI.利用多光谱三维数据采集进行混合PET/MRI成像时减少牙种植体患者的金属伪影
EJNMMI Phys. 2014 Dec;1(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s40658-014-0102-z. Epub 2014 Dec 20.
7
MRI with intraoral orthodontic appliance-a comparative in vitro and in vivo study of image artefacts at 1.5 T.带有口腔正畸矫治器的MRI——1.5T下图像伪影的体外和体内对比研究
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(6):20140416. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20140416. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
8
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) artefacts in hip prostheses: a comparison of different prosthetic compositions.髋关节假体中的磁共振成像(MRI)伪影:不同假体成分的比较。
Radiol Med. 2014 Feb;119(2):113-20. doi: 10.1007/s11547-013-0315-6. Epub 2013 Dec 3.
9
Influence of dental materials on dental MRI.牙科材料对牙科 MRI 的影响。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(6):20120271. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20120271. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
10
In vitro degradation of four magnesium-zinc-strontium alloys and their cytocompatibility with human embryonic stem cells.四种镁锌锶合金的体外降解及其与人胚胎干细胞的细胞相容性。
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2013 Apr;24(4):989-1003. doi: 10.1007/s10856-013-4853-1. Epub 2013 Jan 30.