Zachriat C, Asbach P, Blankenstein K I, Peroz I, Blankenstein F H
1 Department of Prosthodontics, Geriatric Dentistry and Craniomandibular Disorders, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
2 Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(6):20140416. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20140416. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
We investigated artefacts caused from orthodontic appliances at 1.5-T MRI of the head and neck region and whether the image quality can be improved utilizing the artefact-minimizing sequence WARP.
In vitro tests were performed by phantom measurements of different orthodontic devices applying different types of MR sequences [echoplanar imaging (EPI), turbo spin echo (TSE) and TSE-WARP, gradient echo (GRE)]. Two independent readers determined after calibration the level of artefacts. Subsequently, the interobserver agreement was calculated. The measurement of artefacts was based on the American Society for Testing Materials Standard F 2119-07. For in vivo imaging, one test person was scanned with an inserted multibracket appliance. The level of artefacts for 27 target regions was evaluated.
In vitro: ceramic brackets and ferromagnetic steel brackets produced artefact radii up to 1.12 and 7.40 cm, respectively. WARP reduced these artefacts by an average of 32.7%. The Bland-Altman-Plot indicated that maximum measurement differences of 3 mm have to be expected with two calibrated observers. In vivo: the EPI sequence for brain imaging was not analysable. The TSE sequence of the brain did not demonstrate artefacts except for the nasal cavity. Conversely, the TSE sequence of the cervical spine revealed severe artefacts in the midface region. The GRE sequence appeared to be more susceptible to artefacts than did the TSE sequence.
In vitro measurements allow an estimation of the in vivo artefact size. Orthodontic appliances may often remain intraorally when performing MRI. WARP showed a more significant effect in vitro than in vivo.
我们研究了正畸矫治器在头部和颈部区域1.5-T磁共振成像(MRI)中产生的伪影,以及使用伪影最小化序列WARP是否可以提高图像质量。
通过对不同正畸装置应用不同类型的磁共振序列[回波平面成像(EPI)、快速自旋回波(TSE)和TSE-WARP、梯度回波(GRE)]进行体模测量来进行体外测试。两名独立的阅片者在校准后确定伪影水平。随后,计算观察者间的一致性。伪影的测量基于美国材料与试验协会标准F 2119-07。对于体内成像,对一名插入多托槽矫治器的测试者进行扫描。评估27个目标区域的伪影水平。
体外:陶瓷托槽和铁磁钢托槽产生的伪影半径分别高达1.12和7.40厘米。WARP使这些伪影平均减少了32.7%。Bland-Altman图表明,两名校准后的观察者预期最大测量差异为3毫米。体内:用于脑成像的EPI序列无法分析。除鼻腔外,脑部的TSE序列未显示伪影。相反,颈椎的TSE序列在中面部区域显示出严重伪影。GRE序列似乎比TSE序列更容易受到伪影影响。
体外测量可估计体内伪影大小。进行MRI检查时,正畸矫治器可能经常留在口腔内。WARP在体外的效果比在体内更显著。