Goldfarb M G, Bazzoli G J, Coffey R M
Division of Provider Studies, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, University of Maryland Baltimore County 21228, USA.
Health Serv Res. 1996 Apr;31(1):71-95.
This study examines the cost of providing trauma services in trauma centers organized by publicly administered trauma systems, compared to hospitals not part of a formal trauma system.
Secondary administrative discharge abstracts for a national sample of severely injured trauma patients in 44 trauma centers and 60 matched control hospitals for the year 1987 were used.
Retrospective univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to examine the impact of formal trauma systems and trauma center designation on the costs of treating trauma patients. Key dependent variables included length of stay, charge per day per patient, and charge per hospital stay. Key impact variables were type of trauma system and level of trauma designation. Control variables included patient, hospital, and community characteristics.
DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Data were selected for hospitals based on (1) a large national hospital discharge database, the Hospital Cost and Utilization Project, 1980-1987 (HCUP-2) and (2) a special survey of trauma systems and trauma designation undertaken by the Hospital Research and Educational Trust of the American Hospital Association.
The results show that publicly designated Level I trauma centers, which are the focal point of most trauma systems, have the highest charge per case, the highest average charge per day, and similar or longer average lengths of stay than other hospitals. These findings persist after controlling for patient injury and health status, and for demographic characteristics and hospital and community characteristics.
Prior research shows that severely injured trauma patients have greater chances of survival when treated in specialized trauma centers. However, findings here should be of concern to the many states developing trauma systems since the high costs of Level I centers support limiting the number of centers designated at this level and/or reconsidering the requirements placed on these centers.
本研究考察了由公共管理的创伤系统组织的创伤中心提供创伤服务的成本,并与未纳入正式创伤系统的医院进行比较。
使用了1987年全国44家创伤中心和60家匹配对照医院中重伤创伤患者的二次行政出院摘要。
进行回顾性单变量和多变量分析,以考察正式创伤系统和创伤中心指定对创伤患者治疗成本的影响。关键因变量包括住院时间、每位患者每天的费用以及每次住院的费用。关键影响变量是创伤系统类型和创伤指定级别。控制变量包括患者、医院和社区特征。
数据收集/提取方法:基于(1)一个大型国家医院出院数据库,即1980 - 1987年医院成本与利用项目(HCUP - 2),以及(2)美国医院协会医院研究与教育信托基金对创伤系统和创伤指定进行的一项特别调查,为医院选择数据。
结果显示,作为大多数创伤系统核心的公共指定的一级创伤中心,每例收费最高,平均每天收费最高,且平均住院时间与其他医院相似或更长。在控制了患者损伤和健康状况、人口统计学特征以及医院和社区特征后,这些发现依然存在。
先前的研究表明,重伤创伤患者在专门的创伤中心接受治疗时存活几率更高。然而,鉴于一级中心的高成本支持限制该级别指定中心的数量和/或重新考虑对这些中心的要求,本研究结果应引起许多正在发展创伤系统的州的关注。