Lévy P, Pépin J L, Deschaux-Blanc C, Paramelle B, Brambilla C
Department of Respiratory Medicine, AGIR, Home Care Regional Association for Respiratory Insufficiency, Grenoble, France.
Chest. 1996 Feb;109(2):395-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.109.2.395.
The cost and inconvenience of polysomnography make simplified techniques of screening desirable in the strategy of diagnosis of sleep apnea syndrome (SAS). We have evaluated, in a prospective study of 301 consecutive patients referred for suspected sleep disorders, an index (delta index) that detects apneic events by quantifying arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) variability.
Regional sleep laboratory taking referrals from general practitioners and specialists.
Classic polysomnography was the gold standard, with 15 apneas plus hypopneas per hour (RDI) being used as a threshold for definition of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Oximetry was recorded over the same night. Signal variability was quantified as a function of time, using digital processing of oximetric data. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of oximetry testing were calculated. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed representing the comparative courses of sensitivity and 1-specificity at different thresholds of delta index.
Three hundred one patients were included (age, 56 +/- 12 years). Their RDI was 30 +/- 24. For a delta threshold at 0.6, the sensitivity of oximetry for the diagnosis of OSA was 98% and the specificity was 46%. The positive and negative predictive values for diagnosing SAS were 77% and 94%, respectively. The three false-negative cases had a relatively high awake SaO2 (97 vs 93.9 +/- 2.8%), a moderate RDI (23.3 +/- 1.6), and were less obese than the other patients (body mass index: 25 +/- 3 vs 33 +/- 8). The 58 false-positive cases had an RDI of 8 +/- 4, an awake SaO2 of 93.1 +/- 3.6 vs 94.1 +/- 2.6 for the rest of the population (p = 0.01). Finally, the false-positive cases had more airways obstruction (FEV1/VC = 72 +/- 13 vs 77 +/- 15%; p = 0.026). Using a delta value of 0.8 leads to a sensitivity of 90% with 19 false-negative cases but with a higher specificity of 75%.
A nocturnal oximetry test with a delta index below 0.6 is helpful in ruling out the diagnosis of SAS in patients being screened for this condition, as this yielded only three negative test results in 301 screening procedures.
多导睡眠图检查的成本和不便使得在睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(SAS)诊断策略中采用简化筛查技术很有必要。在一项对301例连续转诊疑似睡眠障碍患者的前瞻性研究中,我们评估了一种通过量化动脉血氧饱和度(SaO2)变异性来检测呼吸暂停事件的指标(δ指数)。
接收全科医生和专科医生转诊的地区睡眠实验室。
经典多导睡眠图检查为金标准,每小时15次呼吸暂停加呼吸浅慢(呼吸紊乱指数,RDI)作为阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的定义阈值。在同一晚记录血氧饱和度。通过对血氧饱和度数据进行数字处理,将信号变异性量化为时间的函数。计算血氧饱和度检测的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。构建一条受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,代表在不同δ指数阈值下敏感性和1-特异性的比较过程。
纳入301例患者(年龄56±12岁)。他们的RDI为30±24。当δ阈值为0.6时,血氧饱和度检测诊断OSA的敏感性为98%,特异性为46%。诊断SAS的阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为77%和94%。3例假阴性病例清醒时的SaO2相对较高(97%对93.9±2.8%),RDI中等(23.3±1.6),且比其他患者肥胖程度低(体重指数:25±3对33±8)。58例假阳性病例的RDI为8±4,清醒时的SaO2为93.1±3.6%,而其余人群为94.1±2.6%(p=0.01)。最后,假阳性病例气道阻塞情况更严重(第1秒用力呼气容积/肺活量=72±13%对77±15%;p=0.026)。使用δ值0.8时,敏感性为90%,有19例假阴性病例,但特异性更高,为75%。
对于筛查SAS的患者,夜间血氧饱和度检测且δ指数低于0.6有助于排除SAS诊断,因为在301次筛查过程中仅有3例假阴性结果。