Ishimaru Keisou, Kawakita Kenji, Sakita Masakazu
Department of Oriental Medicine, Meiji College of Oriental Medicine, Hiyoshi, Funai, Kyoto 629-03 Japan Department of Physiology Meiji College of Oriental Medicine, Hiyoshi, Funai, Kyoto 629-03 Japan Department of Surgery, Meiji College of Oriental Medicine, Hiyoshi, Funai, Kyoto 629-03 Japan.
Pain. 1995 Nov;63(2):181-187. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00030-V.
Effects of conditioning peripheral nerve stimulation with different types of stimulating electrodes on pain thresholds in various deep tissues were measured in human subjects. Cone-shaped metal (phi 13 mm), rubber (phi 13 mm), and large soft surface electrodes (50 x 150 mm) were used for transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), and insulated and non-insulated acupuncture needles (diameter: 240 microns) were used for electroacupuncture (EA). Two pairs of electrodes were placed around the point of deep pain measurement. Symmetrical positive and negative square pulses (0.1 msec at 100 Hz) of just below the pain tolerance intensity were used for both TENS and EA. Deep pain thresholds were measured at the center of the thigh with a pulse algometer and insulated needle electrodes. Pain thresholds of deep tissues were in the order periosteum < fascia < skin (including subcutaneous tissues) < muscle. TENS with surface electrodes significantly increased pain thresholds of skin and fascia but not those of muscle or periosteum. The shape, material and size of the surface electrodes hardly affected the degree of analgesic effect, except in the fascia by large soft electrodes. In contrast, EA with non-insulated needles induced a greater increase in pain threshold in skin, fascia and muscle, although statistically significant results were obtained in only the first two tissues. EA with insulated needle electrodes was the only technique with which we obtained a significant increase in pain threshold in muscle and periosteum. These results suggest that the choice of electrode and stimulus parameters is important for the production of sufficient analgesic effects in different somatic tissues and that insulated needle electrodes are useful for pain relief in deeper tissues such as muscle and periosteum.
在人体受试者中测量了使用不同类型刺激电极进行外周神经刺激预处理对各种深部组织疼痛阈值的影响。锥形金属电极(直径13毫米)、橡胶电极(直径13毫米)和大型软表面电极(50×150毫米)用于经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS),绝缘和非绝缘针灸针(直径:240微米)用于电针疗法(EA)。两对电极放置在深部疼痛测量点周围。TENS和EA均使用略低于疼痛耐受强度的对称正负方波脉冲(100赫兹时为0.1毫秒)。使用脉冲痛觉计和绝缘针电极在大腿中部测量深部疼痛阈值。深部组织的疼痛阈值顺序为骨膜<筋膜<皮肤(包括皮下组织)<肌肉。使用表面电极的TENS显著提高了皮肤和筋膜的疼痛阈值,但未提高肌肉或骨膜的疼痛阈值。表面电极的形状、材料和尺寸对镇痛效果的程度影响不大,但大型软电极对筋膜的镇痛效果除外。相比之下,使用非绝缘针的EA在皮肤、筋膜和肌肉中引起的疼痛阈值升高幅度更大,尽管仅在前两个组织中获得了具有统计学意义的结果。使用绝缘针电极的EA是唯一一种使我们在肌肉和骨膜中获得疼痛阈值显著升高的技术。这些结果表明,电极和刺激参数的选择对于在不同躯体组织中产生足够的镇痛效果很重要,并且绝缘针电极对于缓解肌肉和骨膜等深部组织的疼痛很有用。