Paix Andrew, Coleman Andrew, Lees Judith, Grigson Jane, Brooksbank Mary, Thorne David, Ashby Michael
Chronic Pain Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia Department of Pharmacy, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia Palliative Care Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia Mary Potter Hospice, Calvary Hospital Adelaide, SA, Australia Western Palliative Care Service, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA, Australia.
Pain. 1995 Nov;63(2):263-269. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00084-6.
Eleven patients with cancer pain in a palliative care and chronic pain service required cessation of morphine due to unacceptable opioid side effects. In this retrospective study fentanyl was evaluated as a second-line subcutaneously infused opioid. Starting doses ranged from 100 to 1000 micrograms/24 h, and the duration of fentanyl infusion was 3-70 days. The clinically derived mean relative potency of fentanyl to morphine infusions was 68:1 (SD +/- 23; range: 15-100), and we now recommend cautious dose conversion at an approximate equivalence of 150-200 micrograms fentanyl for 10 mg morphine in non-opioid naive chronic cancer pain patients. All patients demonstrated an improvement in the adverse effect(s) for which the change in opioid was undertaken. Adequate pain relief was achieved in all but 1 patient with mixed nociceptive and neuropathic pelvic pain for whom an epidural infusion of a local anaesthetic/opioid mixture was required. Fentanyl was changed to the more potent synthetic opioid sufentanil in 2 patients for whom the fentanyl dose necessitated too large a volume for the portable syringe driver in use. The clinically derived sufentanil to fentanyl relative potencies were 24:1 and 16:1, respectively. This achieved good analgesia and maintained the favourable side-effect profile seen with fentanyl. Subcutaneous infusion appears to be a safe and viable route of fentanyl delivery, and provided effective analgesia with a low incidence of adverse effects in this small selected group of patients who were intolerant of subcutaneous morphine. We suggest a trial of subcutaneous fentanyl for selected patients who have intractable adverse effects on morphine, and it is now the second-line infusable opioid in our service. Further prospective evaluation of the role of these two synthetic mu opioid agonists in palliative care practice is warranted, as part of an evolving picture of variation in opioid side-effect profile seen with different drugs within the class.
在姑息治疗和慢性疼痛服务中,11名癌症疼痛患者因无法耐受阿片类药物的副作用而需要停用吗啡。在这项回顾性研究中,芬太尼被评估为二线皮下注射阿片类药物。起始剂量范围为100至1000微克/24小时,芬太尼输注持续时间为3至70天。临床得出的芬太尼与吗啡输注的平均相对效价为68:1(标准差±23;范围:15至100),我们现在建议在非初用阿片类药物的慢性癌症疼痛患者中,以约150至200微克芬太尼等效于10毫克吗啡的剂量进行谨慎的剂量转换。所有患者在因更换阿片类药物而出现的不良反应方面均有改善。除1名患有混合性伤害性和神经性盆腔疼痛的患者外,所有患者均实现了充分的疼痛缓解,该患者需要硬膜外输注局部麻醉药/阿片类药物混合物。2名患者因芬太尼剂量需要使用的便携式注射器驱动器容纳的体积过大,而将芬太尼更换为更强效的合成阿片类药物舒芬太尼。临床得出的舒芬太尼与芬太尼的相对效价分别为24:1和16:1。这实现了良好的镇痛效果,并维持了芬太尼所见的有利副作用特征。皮下输注似乎是芬太尼给药的一种安全可行的途径,在这一小群对皮下吗啡不耐受的患者中提供了有效的镇痛效果,且不良反应发生率较低。我们建议对选定的对吗啡有顽固性不良反应的患者试用皮下芬太尼,目前它是我们服务中的二线可输注阿片类药物。鉴于该类药物中不同药物所见阿片类药物副作用特征的变化情况不断演变,有必要对这两种合成μ阿片受体激动剂在姑息治疗实践中的作用进行进一步的前瞻性评估。