Wisker E, Bach Knudsen K E, Daniel M, Feldheim W, Eggum B O
Christian Albrechts-University of Kiel, Institute of Human Nutrition and Food Science, Germany.
J Nutr. 1996 Feb;126(2):481-8. doi: 10.1093/jn/126.2.481.
The apparent digestibility of energy, protein, fat and nonstarch polysaccharides (NSP) of a low fiber diet and two high fiber diets containing coarse or fine whole meal rye bread was studied in experiments with humans and rats. Human subjects consumed the experimental diets for 3 wk each in a 3 x 3 cross over design. For the rat diets, duplicate portions of the foods consumed by the human subjects were mixed together, freeze dried and ground. There was a good agreement in the digestibility of energy (humans: 94.7 +/- 0.9, 91.2 +/- 1.2 and 91.6 +/- 1.4%; rats: 95.0 +/- 0.8, 92.5 +/- 1.4 and 91.7 +/- 1.8%) and fat (humans: 95.2 +/- 1.5, 94.4 +/- 1.0 and 94.8 +/- 2.5%, rats: 95.4 +/- 0.9, 94.0 +/- 0.4 and 94.0 +/- 0.4%) for the low fiber diet and the diets containing coarse or fine whole meal bread, respectively. Apparent and true digestibility of protein was consistently lower (P < 0.0001) in humans (apparent digestibility: 90.6 +/- 1.5, 86.2 +/- 1.4 and 86.3 +/- 2.3%; true digestibility: 95.1 +/- 1.5, 90.7 +/- 1.4 and 90.8 +/- 2.2%) than in rats (apparent digestibility: 92.3 +/- 1.1, 89.4 +/- 0.9 and 88.9 +/- 1.0%; true digestibility: 98.3 +/- 1.1, 94.9 +/- 0.9 and 94.2 +/- 1.0%) for all three diets. The digestibility of NSP tended to be lower (P < 0.066) in rats than in humans for the diet containing fine whole meal bread (rats: 59.6 +/- 8.0%, humans: 68.0 +/- 5.2%) and the low fiber diet (rats: 72.1 +/- 10.8%; humans: 80.5 +/- 7.1%), whereas it was similar in both species for the diet containing the coarse whole meal bread (rats: 66.1 +/- 6.0%; humans: 65.8 +/- 9.3%). In spite of some differences in digestibility values, our results suggest that the rat is a suitable model for humans to predict digestibility of nutrients in mixed diets containing cereal fiber sources.
在人体和大鼠实验中,研究了低纤维饮食以及两种分别含有粗磨或细磨全麦黑麦面包的高纤维饮食中能量、蛋白质、脂肪和非淀粉多糖(NSP)的表观消化率。人体受试者采用3×3交叉设计,每种实验饮食各食用3周。对于大鼠饮食,将人体受试者食用的食物的重复份混合在一起,冷冻干燥并研磨。低纤维饮食以及分别含有粗磨或细磨全麦面包的饮食,在能量消化率方面(人体:94.7±0.9、91.2±1.2和91.6±1.4%;大鼠:95.0±0.8、92.5±1.4和91.7±1.8%)和脂肪消化率方面(人体:95.2±1.5、94.4±1.0和94.8±2.5%,大鼠:95.4±0.9、94.0±0.4和94.0±0.4%)有着良好的一致性。在所有三种饮食中,人体蛋白质的表观消化率和真消化率始终低于大鼠(P<0.0001)(表观消化率:人体为90.6±1.5、86.2±1.4和86.3±2.3%;真消化率:人体为95.1±1.5、90.7±1.4和90.8±2.2%;大鼠表观消化率:92.3±1.1、89.4±0.9和88.9±1.0%;真消化率:98.3±1.1、94.9±0.9和94.2±1.0%)。对于含有细磨全麦面包的饮食(大鼠:59.6±8.0%,人体:68.0±5.2%)和低纤维饮食(大鼠:72.1±10.8%;人体:80.5±7.1%),大鼠的NSP消化率往往低于人体,而对于含有粗磨全麦面包的饮食,两种物种的NSP消化率相似(大鼠:66.1±6.0%;人体:65.8±9.3%)。尽管消化率值存在一些差异,但我们的结果表明,大鼠是预测含有谷物纤维来源的混合饮食中营养素消化率的合适人体模型。