• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[报纸和宣传册中的健康信息评估。我们能相信什么?]

[Evaluation of health information in newspapers and brochures. What can we believe?].

作者信息

Johansen L W, Bjørndal A, Flottorp S, Grøtting T, Oxman A D

机构信息

Seksjon for helsetjenesteforskning Avdeling for samfunnsmedisin Statens institutt for folkehelse, Oslo.

出版信息

Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1996 Jan 20;116(2):260-4.

PMID:8633338
Abstract

Health service users need reliable information to be able to make informed decisions. We evaluated the scientific quality of information presented at a large health fair in Oslo in 1995 and health-related articles in five newspapers during one week in the spring of 1995. The brochures scored consistently low on the index used to measure scientific quality. It was generally impossible to distinguish opinions from facts, or to assess the validity and consistency of the evidence underlying the conveyed information. Important consequences (benefits, risks and costs) were rarely assessed. Health-related articles in the lay press also scored low on the index. Minor changes could have led to marked improvement of some of the articles. It is important to improve the ability of journalists and producers of brochures to appraise their work in a critical light.

摘要

卫生服务的使用者需要可靠的信息以便能够做出明智的决定。我们评估了1995年在奥斯陆举办的一次大型健康博览会上所展示信息的科学质量,以及1995年春季某一周内五家报纸上与健康相关的文章。宣传册在用以衡量科学质量的指标上得分一直很低。通常无法区分观点与事实,也无法评估所传达信息背后证据的有效性和一致性。很少对重要后果(益处、风险和成本)进行评估。大众媒体上与健康相关的文章在该指标上得分也很低。一些小的改动本可使其中一些文章有显著改进。重要的是要提高记者和宣传册制作者以批判性眼光评估其作品的能力。

相似文献

1
[Evaluation of health information in newspapers and brochures. What can we believe?].[报纸和宣传册中的健康信息评估。我们能相信什么?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1996 Jan 20;116(2):260-4.
2
[Press coverage of medical issues].[关于医学问题的新闻报道]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1996 Jan 20;116(2):255-9.
3
[Validation of a questionnaire to assess the quality of health information in Argentinian newspapers].
Biomedica. 2005 Sep;25(3):366-76.
4
Drugs in the news: an analysis of Canadian newspaper coverage of new prescription drugs.新闻中的药物:加拿大报纸对新处方药报道的分析
CMAJ. 2003 Apr 29;168(9):1133-7.
5
["New wonder pill!"--what do Norwegian newspapers write].["神奇新药!”——挪威报纸都写了些什么]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2002 Jun 30;122(17):1671-6.
6
[When health makes the headlines. Press, elite complicities and health globalisation in Bamako, Mali].
Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2007 Aug;100(3):207-15.
7
Inconsistent journalism: the coverage of chronic diseases in the Mexican press.不一致的新闻报道:墨西哥媒体对慢性病的报道
J Health Commun. 2001 Jul-Sep;6(3):235-47. doi: 10.1080/108107301752384424.
8
Did news reporters get it right? Translation of the 2002 hormone study findings.新闻记者报道正确吗?2002年激素研究结果的翻译。
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Jan;34(1):61-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.09.023.
9
Farm-related injury event, social consequences and injury reporting in the Land Lantbruk newspaper in Sweden: a retrospective study of farm-related injury reporting during 2000-2005.瑞典《土地与农业》报纸上与农场相关的伤害事件、社会后果及伤害报告:对2000 - 2005年期间与农场相关伤害报告的回顾性研究
Aust J Rural Health. 2006 Dec;14(6):249-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2006.00824.x.
10
Assessing the quality of newspaper medical advice columns for elderly readers.评估面向老年读者的报纸医疗建议专栏的质量。
CMAJ. 1999 Aug 24;161(4):393-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of mass media resources to improve the ability of parents of primary school children in Uganda to assess the trustworthiness of claims about the effects of treatments: a human-centred design approach.开发大众媒体资源以提高乌干达小学生家长评估有关治疗效果说法可信度的能力:一种以人为本的设计方法。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019 Dec 29;5:155. doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0540-4. eCollection 2019.
2
Who can you trust? A review of free online sources of "trustworthy" information about treatment effects for patients and the public.谁可以信任?对关于患者和公众的治疗效果的“可信”信息的免费在线资源进行了综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Feb 20;19(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0772-5.
3
Development of a complex intervention to improve health literacy skills.
开发一种复杂干预措施以提高健康素养技能。
Health Info Libr J. 2013 Dec;30(4):278-93. doi: 10.1111/hir.12037. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
4
Evaluation of a web portal for improving public access to evidence-based health information and health literacy skills: a pragmatic trial.评价一个改善公众获取循证健康信息和健康素养技能的门户网站的效果:一项实用试验。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037715. Epub 2012 May 31.
5
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 15: Engaging the public in evidence-informed policymaking.支持循证卫生决策的工具(STP)15:让公众参与循证决策。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2009 Dec 16;7 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S15. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S15.
6
The use of evidence in public governmental reports on health policy: an analysis of 17 Norwegian official reports (NOU).利用证据撰写公共卫生政策政府报告:对 17 份挪威官方报告(NOU)的分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Sep 28;9:177. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-177.
7
The use of evidence by health care user organizations.
Health Expect. 1998 Jun;1(1):14-22. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.1998.00002.x.