Docherty N M, DeRosa M, Andreasen N C
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn, USA.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996 Apr;53(4):358-64. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830040094014.
A "natural language" measure was developed for classifying type and severity of communication disturbance in the speech of psychotic patients by assessing their linguistic reference performance.
This measure was applied to speech samples of schizophrenic, manic, and nonpsychiatric subjects, and the groups were compared on levels and types of communication failures.
The speech of the schizophrenic and manic subjects contained much higher frequencies of each of six types of communication failures than did the speech of the control subjects. Proportions of the different types of unclarity differed among the diagnostic groups.
This method provides a measure of overall severity of communication disturbance, discriminates the speech of schizophrenic and manic subjects from that of nonpsychiatric subjects, and reflects some differences in distribution of types of communication failure in schizophrenic vs manic patients. The measure may be helpful in elucidating cognitive weaknesses underlying psychotic communication failures.
通过评估精神病患者的语言指称表现,开发了一种“自然语言”测量方法,用于对精神病患者言语中的交流障碍类型和严重程度进行分类。
将该测量方法应用于精神分裂症患者、躁狂症患者和非精神病受试者的言语样本,并比较各组在交流失败的水平和类型上的差异。
精神分裂症患者和躁狂症患者的言语中,六种交流失败类型中的每一种出现的频率都比对照组受试者的言语高得多。不同类型的不清晰比例在诊断组之间存在差异。
该方法提供了一种交流障碍总体严重程度的测量方法,能够区分精神分裂症患者和躁狂症患者与非精神病受试者的言语,并反映出精神分裂症患者与躁狂症患者在交流失败类型分布上的一些差异。该测量方法可能有助于阐明精神病性交流失败背后的认知弱点。