Suppr超能文献

来自储雾装置的单剂量与多剂量定量吸入支气管扩张剂吸入:一项体外研究。

Inhalation of single vs multiple metered-dose bronchodilator actuations from reservoir devices. An in vitro study.

作者信息

Rau J L, Restrepo R D, Deshpande V

机构信息

Cardiopulmonary Care Sciences, Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA.

出版信息

Chest. 1996 Apr;109(4):969-74. doi: 10.1378/chest.109.4.969.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Differences in inhalation technique with reservoir or spacer devices may affect metered-dose inhaler (MDI) dose availability to a patient.

PURPOSE

This study examined the effect of single vs multiple actuations of an MDI into reservoir devices on dose delivery of albuterol, with three clinically available reservoir brands.

METHODS

An in vitro lung model simulated inspiration from the MDI reservoir system. Albuterol (Proventil; Schering) was delivered by MDI, with the Monaghan Aerochamber, the Diemolding Healthcare Division (DHD) aerosol cloud enhancer (ACE), and the Schering InspirEase, using standardized volumes and inspiratory flows of 30 L min(-1). The MDI was actuated into each brand of reservoir 1, 2, or 3 times in rapid succession, followed by a single inhalation. Aerosol dose at the reservoir mouthpiece was captured on a cotton filter, dissolved in ethanol, and measured with a spectrophotometer at 278 nm.

RESULTS

For all three brands of reservoir, less accumulated dose of drug is delivered with multiple actuations than with multiple single actuations each followed by inhalation. The total dose in milligrams increased significantly with two multiple actuations compared with one actuation in the Aerochamber and ACE (p<0.01), but not in the InspirEase (p>0.05). The Aerochamber, ACE, and InspirEase delivered a mean total dose (SD) of 0.0264 mg (0.012), 0.0271 mg (0.007), and 0.0136 mg (0.006), respectively, with one actuation compared to 0.0485 mg (0.011), 0.0453 mg (0.013), and 0.0218 mg (0.009) with two multiple actuations. The increase in total dose with three multiple actuations was not significant compared to two actuations for any of the brands tested (p>0.05). Although total dose increased with multiple actuations, a decline in efficiency was seen with two and three multiple actuations, compared to single actuation. The dose delivered per actuation decreased for the Aerochamber, ACE, and InspirEase from 0.0264 mg (0.012), 0.0271 mg (0.007), and 0.0136 mg (0.006) with one actuation, to 0.0243 mg (0.006), 0.0226 mg (0.006), and 0.0109 mg (0.005), respectively, with two multiple actuations, for losses of 8.0%, 16.6%, and 19.9% in dose per actuation for each brand. A further decline in delivery per actuation to 0.0164 mg (0.001), 0.0184 mg (0.004), and 0.0097 mg (0.005) for the 3 brands, respectively, was found with 3 multiple actuations before inhalation. This was a loss of 37.9%, 32.1%, and 28.7% of the dose per single actuation in each brand. There was no significant difference between the Aerochamber and the ACE in dose availability with 1, 2, or 3 actuations, but both of these brands provided significantly more drug than the InspirEase.

CONCLUSION

Maximal aerosol bronchodilator from an MDI reservoir was given by single actuations each followed by a breath. Two rapid actuations followed by a breath will give a significant accumulation of dose with some loss when compared to two single actuations each followed by inhalation. Three multiple actuations led to a loss of approximately one third of the drug dose obtainable with three single actuations each followed by inhalation, for all three brands.

摘要

未贴标签

使用储雾罐或储物器装置时吸入技术的差异可能会影响患者获得的定量吸入器(MDI)剂量。

目的

本研究使用三种临床可用的储雾罐品牌,研究了MDI向储雾罐装置单次与多次按压对沙丁胺醇剂量递送的影响。

方法

体外肺模型模拟从MDI储雾罐系统吸气。使用标准化体积和30L/min的吸气流量,通过MDI递送沙丁胺醇(普米克令舒;先灵葆雅),使用莫纳根雾化器、迪模塑医疗保健部(DHD)气雾剂云增强器(ACE)和先灵葆雅InspirEase。MDI在每个储雾罐品牌中连续快速按压1、2或3次,然后进行一次吸入。储雾罐吸嘴处的气雾剂剂量收集在棉滤器上,溶于乙醇,并在278nm处用分光光度计测量。

结果

对于所有三种储雾罐品牌,多次按压后递送的累积药物剂量少于每次按压后吸入的多次单次按压。与在雾化器和ACE中按压一次相比,两次多次按压后的总毫克剂量显著增加(p<0.01),但在InspirEase中未显著增加(p>0.05)。雾化器、ACE和InspirEase一次按压时的平均总剂量(标准差)分别为0.0264mg(0.012)、0.0271mg(0.007)和0.0136mg(0.006),而两次多次按压时分别为0.0485mg(0.011)、0.0453mg(0.013)和0.0218mg(0.009)。对于所测试的任何品牌,三次多次按压后的总剂量增加与两次按压相比均不显著(p>0.05)。尽管多次按压后总剂量增加,但与单次按压相比,两次和三次多次按压时效率下降。雾化器、ACE和InspirEase每次按压递送的剂量从一次按压时的0.0264mg(0.012)、0.0271mg(0.007)和0.0136mg(0.006),分别降至两次多次按压时的0.0243mg(0.006)、0.0226mg(0.006)和0.0109mg(0.005),每个品牌每次按压的剂量损失分别为8.0%、16.6%和19.9%。在吸入前进行三次多次按压时,发现这三个品牌每次按压的递送量进一步降至0.0164mg(0.001)、0.0184mg(0.004)和0.0097mg(0.005)。这是每个品牌每次单次按压剂量的37.9%、32.1%和28.7%的损失。在按压1、2或3次时,雾化器和ACE在剂量可获得性方面无显著差异,但这两个品牌提供的药物均显著多于InspirEase。

结论

MDI储雾罐最大的气雾剂支气管扩张剂给药方式是每次按压后呼吸一次。与每次按压后吸入的两次单次按压相比,两次快速按压后呼吸会导致剂量显著累积,但有一定损失。对于所有三个品牌,三次多次按压导致与三次单次按压后每次吸入可获得的药物剂量相比损失约三分之一。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验