• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

麻醉相关死亡率与麻醉导致的死亡:南非法医学方法

Anaesthetic-associated mortality and anaesthetic contributory death: the South African medicolegal approach.

作者信息

Moar J J

机构信息

Medicolegal Laboratories, Department of Health, Johannesburg, South Africa.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Int. 1996 Apr 23;78(3):219-30. doi: 10.1016/0379-0738(95)01887-5.

DOI:10.1016/0379-0738(95)01887-5
PMID:8635766
Abstract

The medicolegal approach to cases of anaesthetic-associated mortality and anaesthetic contributory death (ACD) occurring in Johannesburg, South Africa is presented. The approach adopted has been found to be reasonably workable in practice and places heavy emphasis on the surgical and anaesthetic-related reasons for perioperative deaths and, in particular, on their multifactorial aetiology. It is recognised that in view of the multifactorial nature of the anaesthetic environment certain errors in clinical anaesthetic management are neither precisely quantifiable nor assessable. It is further emphasized that perioperative quality control programs as well as Inquest Court proceedings should comprise input by a team of specialists and which include clinical anaesthesiologists, surgeons and forensic pathologists.

摘要

本文介绍了南非约翰内斯堡针对麻醉相关死亡病例和麻醉促成死亡(ACD)所采用的法医学方法。实践发现所采用的方法切实可行,且高度重视围手术期死亡的手术和麻醉相关原因,尤其是其多因素病因。鉴于麻醉环境的多因素性质,临床麻醉管理中的某些失误既难以精确量化,也无法评估。本文进一步强调,围手术期质量控制计划以及死因裁判法庭程序应包括由一组专家提供的意见,其中包括临床麻醉医生、外科医生和法医病理学家。

相似文献

1
Anaesthetic-associated mortality and anaesthetic contributory death: the South African medicolegal approach.麻醉相关死亡率与麻醉导致的死亡:南非法医学方法
Forensic Sci Int. 1996 Apr 23;78(3):219-30. doi: 10.1016/0379-0738(95)01887-5.
2
[What should we do and what should we not do after an anaesthetic accident. The point of view of a medical expert].[麻醉事故发生后我们该做什么以及不该做什么。医学专家的观点]
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2012 Jan;31(1):e47-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2011.11.004. Epub 2011 Dec 3.
3
Death due to anaesthesia at Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town--1956-1987. Part II. Causes and changes in aetiological pattern of anaesthetic-contributory death.开普敦古特·舒尔医院1956 - 1987年麻醉相关死亡情况。第二部分。麻醉相关死亡病因模式的原因及变化
S Afr Med J. 1990 Apr 21;77(8):416-21.
4
Development and validation of an instrument for procedure-related death notification.制定并验证一种与手术相关的死亡通知的文书。
S Afr Med J. 2020 Jan 29;110(2):140-144. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2020.v110i2.14083.
5
[Reflections on anesthetic risk].[关于麻醉风险的思考]
Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere. 1998 Sep;26(5):302-14.
6
Malpractice and system of expertise in anaesthetic procedures in Turkey.土耳其麻醉程序中的医疗过失与专业技能体系
Forensic Sci Int. 2005 Oct 29;153(2-3):161-7. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.08.016. Epub 2004 Nov 11.
7
[Risk in anaesthesia].[麻醉中的风险]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2010 Mar 11;130(5):498-502. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.08.0666.
8
Primary anaesthetic deaths in Western Australia from 1985-2008: causation and preventability.1985年至2008年西澳大利亚州的主要麻醉死亡病例:病因及可预防性
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2013 May;41(3):302-10. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1304100305.
9
The Canadian four-centre study of anaesthetic outcomes: II. Can outcomes be used to assess the quality of anaesthesia care?加拿大麻醉结局四中心研究:II. 结局能否用于评估麻醉护理质量?
Can J Anaesth. 1992 May;39(5 Pt 1):430-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03008706.
10
Forensic medicine in South Africa--time for change?南非的法医学——是时候变革了吗?
Med Law. 1994;13(1-2):129-32.

引用本文的文献

1
Preoperative anaesthesia information--what do patients need to know?术前麻醉信息——患者需要了解什么?
Ir J Med Sci. 2000 Apr-Jun;169(2):93, 95. doi: 10.1007/BF03166906.