Phillips S, Rond P C, Kelly S M, Swartz P D
Policy Sciences Center, Florida State University, Tallahassee 32306-2018, USA.
J Trauma. 1996 Feb;40(2):278-83. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199602000-00018.
Since 1990, Florida has used a uniform set of eight triage criteria, known as the trauma scorecard, for triaging adult patients with trauma to state-approved trauma centers. If any one of the eight criteria are met, paramedics classify the patient as a "trauma alert" and transport to a state-approved trauma center. Widespread concern within the trauma care community that the scorecard was not providing an effective tool for adult trauma triage, particularly for older adults, was a motivating force for conducting an evaluation of the trauma scorecard's performance. Thus, the Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Office of Emergency Medical Services initiated a research effort to assess the effectiveness of the state-adopted trauma triage criteria for adults, giving special attention to geriatric trauma. The results of the Florida Trauma Triage Study indicate that the eight triage criteria comprising the trauma scorecard produce unacceptable levels of undertriage in elderly patients (age 55 years or older) with life-threatening injuries.
自1990年以来,佛罗里达州一直使用一套统一的八项分诊标准,即创伤计分卡,对成年创伤患者进行分诊,将其送往该州批准的创伤中心。如果八项标准中的任何一项得到满足,护理人员就会将患者归类为“创伤警报”,并送往该州批准的创伤中心。创伤护理界普遍担心计分卡不能为成年创伤分诊,尤其是老年患者的分诊提供有效工具,这是开展创伤计分卡性能评估的一个推动因素。因此,佛罗里达州卫生与康复服务部紧急医疗服务办公室发起了一项研究工作,以评估该州采用的成人创伤分诊标准的有效性,特别关注老年创伤。佛罗里达创伤分诊研究的结果表明,构成创伤计分卡的八项分诊标准在危及生命的老年患者(55岁及以上)中产生了不可接受的分诊不足水平。