Suppr超能文献

老年创伤性脑损伤患者的医疗紧迫性是否被急诊科分诊低估了?

Is medical urgency of elderly patients with traumatic brain injury underestimated by emergency department triage?

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, University Hospital of Skåne, Sweden.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Ups J Med Sci. 2020 Feb;125(1):58-63. doi: 10.1080/03009734.2019.1706674. Epub 2020 Jan 28.

Abstract

Mortality is high among elderly patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Recent data suggest that early surgical intervention and aggressive rehabilitation may reduce mortality rates even in elderly patients. Our aim was therefore to study the Rapid Emergency Triage and Treatment System-Adult (RETTS-A) triage of patients with isolated TBI and examine the differences in acute management according to age. We included 306 adult patients with isolated severe TBI and an abbreviated injury scale (AIS) score ≥3. Using a cut-off of 60 years of age, differences in triage priority according to RETTS-A, time to first computed tomography (CT) scan, length of hospital stay (LOS), and 30-day survival were studied. In patients with an AIS score of 3 and 4, we observed that elderly patients had a longer time from admission to first CT scan. In addition, we observed that elderly patients were less often triaged with the highest priority level, despite similar AIS scores. LOS was significantly higher in elderly patients (median 9 days compared with 3 days for younger patients,  < 0.001). Finally, age, triage priority, and AIS score were independent risk factors for mortality. Elderly patients with isolated TBI are managed differently than younger patients, which could be due to an under-triage of elderly patients by RETTS-A.

摘要

老年创伤性脑损伤 (TBI) 患者的死亡率较高。最近的数据表明,即使是老年患者,早期手术干预和积极的康复治疗也可能降低死亡率。因此,我们的目的是研究创伤急救和治疗系统成人版 (RETTS-A) 对单纯性 TBI 患者的分诊,并根据年龄检查急性治疗的差异。我们纳入了 306 名患有单纯性严重 TBI 和简明损伤量表 (AIS) 评分≥3 的成年患者。使用 60 岁的年龄截断值,根据 RETTS-A 的分诊优先级、首次计算机断层扫描 (CT) 检查的时间、住院时间 (LOS) 和 30 天生存率的差异进行研究。在 AIS 评分为 3 和 4 的患者中,我们观察到老年患者从入院到首次 CT 扫描的时间更长。此外,我们观察到尽管 AIS 评分相似,但老年患者的分诊优先级较低。老年患者的 LOS 明显更长(中位数为 9 天,而年轻患者为 3 天, < 0.001)。最后,年龄、分诊优先级和 AIS 评分是死亡的独立危险因素。单纯性 TBI 的老年患者的治疗方法与年轻患者不同,这可能是由于 RETTS-A 对老年患者的分诊不足。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
The Tragically Hip: Trauma in Elderly Patients.悲剧性髋部骨折:老年患者的创伤
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2018 Feb;36(1):219-235. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2017.08.014.
3
Thirty-day mortality after hip fractures: has anything changed?髋部骨折后30天死亡率:有什么变化吗?
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016 May;26(4):365-70. doi: 10.1007/s00590-016-1744-4. Epub 2016 Mar 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验