• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种植体/基台六边形不匹配对螺钉连接稳定性的影响。

The effect of implant/abutment hexagonal misfit on screw joint stability.

作者信息

Binon P P

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of California at San Francisco, USA.

出版信息

Int J Prosthodont. 1996 Mar-Apr;9(2):149-60.

PMID:8639238
Abstract

A series of 10 incrementally larger, machined ASTM Grade 23 titanium non-segmented (UCLA type) abutments was loaded off axis with 133 N and cycled at 1150 vertical strokes per minute and 28 counterclockwise rotations per minute to determine screw joint stability. Abutment internal hexagonals ranged from 0.1065 to 0.1110 inches. External hexagonal mean flat-to-flat width was 2.684 mm. Rotational misfit between international and external hexagonals ranged from 1.94 degrees for the smallest abutment to 14.87 degrees for the largest. Screw joint failure ranged from 134,000 to 9.3 million cycles. The tightest matrix/patrix hexagonal screw joint failed at a mean of 6.7 million cycles. This study indicated that there was a direct correlation between hexagonal misfit and screw joint loosening. A rotational misfit of under 2 degrees provided the most stable and predictable screw joint.

摘要

一系列10个尺寸逐渐增大的、经过加工的ASTM 23级非分段(加州大学洛杉矶分校类型)钛基台,以133 N的偏轴载荷加载,并以每分钟1150次垂直冲程和每分钟28次逆时针旋转进行循环,以确定螺钉连接的稳定性。基台内部六边形尺寸范围为0.1065至0.1110英寸。外部六边形的平均平面到平面宽度为2.684毫米。内部和外部六边形之间的旋转不匹配范围从最小基台的1.94度到最大基台的14.87度。螺钉连接失效范围为134,000至930万次循环。最紧密的基体/基体六边形螺钉连接平均在670万次循环时失效。这项研究表明,六边形不匹配与螺钉连接松动之间存在直接关联。小于2度的旋转不匹配提供了最稳定和可预测的螺钉连接。

相似文献

1
The effect of implant/abutment hexagonal misfit on screw joint stability.种植体/基台六边形不匹配对螺钉连接稳定性的影响。
Int J Prosthodont. 1996 Mar-Apr;9(2):149-60.
2
The effect of eliminating implant/abutment rotational misfit on screw joint stability.消除种植体/基台旋转不匹配对螺钉连接稳定性的影响。
Int J Prosthodont. 1996 Nov-Dec;9(6):511-9.
3
Measurement of the rotational misfit and implant-abutment gap of all-ceramic abutments.全瓷基台旋转不匹配度及种植体-基台间隙的测量。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Nov-Dec;22(6):928-38.
4
Evaluation of gold-machined UCLA-type abutments and CAD/CAM titanium abutments with hexagonal external connection and with internal connection.对采用六边形外部连接和内部连接的金加工UCLA型基台及CAD/CAM钛基台的评估。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Mar-Apr;23(2):247-52.
5
A classification system to measure the implant-abutment microgap.一种用于测量种植体-基台微间隙的分类系统。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Nov-Dec;22(6):879-85.
6
The effect of casting procedures on rotational misfit in castable abutments.铸造工艺对可铸造基牙旋转不匹配的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Jul-Aug;22(4):575-9.
7
Changes in prosthetic screw stability because of misfit of implant-supported prostheses.种植体支持式修复体不匹配导致的修复螺丝稳定性变化。
Int J Prosthodont. 2002 Jan-Feb;15(1):38-42.
8
Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.牙种植体-基台界面的动态疲劳特性:大直径与标准直径六面体型种植体的关节开口情况
J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Jun;85(6):599-607. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.115250.
9
An in vitro evaluation of ZiReal abutments with hexagonal connection: in original state and following abutment preparation.对具有六边形连接的ZiReal基台的体外评估:原始状态及基台预备后。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 Jan-Feb;20(1):108-14.
10
The spline implant: design, engineering, and evaluation.样条植入物:设计、工程与评估。
Int J Prosthodont. 1996 Sep-Oct;9(5):419-33.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Thermodynamic Cyclic Loading on Screw Loosening of Tightened Versus New Abutment Screw in Bone Level and Tissue Level Implants in DIO Implant Company (In-Vitro Study).热力学循环加载对DIO种植体公司骨水平和软组织水平种植体中拧紧的与新的基台螺钉松动的影响(体外研究)
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Aug;11(4):e70162. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70162.
2
Optical measurement methods of the 3D-position stability of implant-abutment connections - an in vitro study.种植体-基台连接三维位置稳定性的光学测量方法——一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jun 6;25(1):931. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06265-y.
3
Engaging vs. Non-Engaging Abutments: An In Vitro Study Evaluating Changes in Microgap and Screw Morphology.
功能性基台与非功能性基台:一项评估微间隙和螺钉形态变化的体外研究。
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Aug 20;12(8):265. doi: 10.3390/dj12080265.
4
Effect of implant‒abutment connections on abutment screw loosening: An in vitro study.种植体-基台连接对基台螺丝松动的影响:一项体外研究。
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2024 Winter;18(1):17-22. doi: 10.34172/joddd.29883. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
5
Influence of Abutment Screw-Tightening Methods on the Screw Joint: Immediate and Long-Term Stability.基台螺丝拧紧方法对螺丝连接的影响:即时和长期稳定性
Int J Dent. 2024 Jan 16;2024:5768318. doi: 10.1155/2024/5768318. eCollection 2024.
6
Rehabilitation of Malpositioned Implant in the Anterior Region With Customized Abutment.使用定制基台修复前牙区种植体位置不良
Cureus. 2023 Dec 13;15(12):e50450. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50450. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
Titanium particles in peri-implantitis: distribution, pathogenesis and prospects.种植体周围炎中的钛颗粒:分布、发病机制与展望。
Int J Oral Sci. 2023 Nov 23;15(1):49. doi: 10.1038/s41368-023-00256-x.
8
Risk Factors Associated with Failure and Technical Complications of Implant-Supported Single Crowns: A Retrospective Study.种植体支持的单冠失败和技术并发症的相关风险因素:一项回顾性研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Sep 5;59(9):1603. doi: 10.3390/medicina59091603.
9
Evaluation of the dislodgement force of splinted restorations with engaging conical abutments over multiple nonparallel implants (in-vitro study).评估带有锥形邻接体的夹板修复体在多个非平行种植体上的脱位力(体外研究)。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 May 17;23(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02958-4.
10
Evaluation of customized cobalt-chromium abutments fabricated with different manufacturing process versus titanium stock abutments on the marginal misfit -An study.不同制作工艺的定制钴铬合金基台与钛基台边缘适合性的比较——一项研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2022 Jul-Sep;22(3):225-232. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_381_21.