• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Asbury draft policy on ethical use of resources.阿斯伯里资源道德使用政策草案。
BMJ. 1996 Jun 15;312(7045):1528-31; discussion 1531-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7045.1528.
2
The ethics of health care rationing.医疗资源分配的伦理问题。
Public Aff Q. 1994 Jan;8(1):33-50.
3
Fundholding practice's draft policy on ethical use of resources. Policy is inconsistent.基金持有机构关于资源合理使用的政策草案。该政策存在不一致之处。
BMJ. 1996 Oct 5;313(7061):883. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7061.883.
4
The ethical physician as negative gatekeeper?道德医生作为消极把关人?
Linacre Q. 1995 Aug;62(3):15-25. doi: 10.1080/20508549.1995.11878311.
5
Reflections on a medical ethics for the future.对未来医学伦理学的思考。
Metamedicine. 1982 Feb;3(1):115-20. doi: 10.1007/BF00882719.
6
Physicians and cost containment: the ethical conflict.医生与成本控制:伦理冲突
Jurimetrics. 1990 Summer;30(4):461-82.
7
Ethics in surgical practice.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996 Jan;97(1):185-93. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199601000-00030.
8
Uncertainty and the shaping of medical decisions.不确定性与医疗决策的形成
Hastings Cent Rep. 1991 Jul-Aug;21(4):6-11.
9
Choosing between cancer patients.在癌症患者之间进行选择。
J Med Ethics. 1990 Jun;16(2):71-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.16.2.71.
10
Clinical practice guidelines as tools of public policy: conflicts of purpose, issues of autonomy, and justice.作为公共政策工具的临床实践指南:目的冲突、自主性问题与正义问题
J Clin Ethics. 1994 Winter;5(4):303-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Absent virtues: the poacher becomes gamekeeper.缺失的美德:偷猎者变成了猎场看守人。
J Med Ethics. 2003 Dec;29(6):337-42. doi: 10.1136/jme.29.6.337.
2
Eliciting reasons: empirical methods in priority setting.引出理由:优先排序中的实证方法
Health Care Anal. 2003 Mar;11(1):41-58. doi: 10.1023/A:1025385929559.
3
Healthcare rationing-are additional criteria needed for assessing evidence based clinical practice guidelines?医疗资源配给——评估循证临床实践指南是否需要额外标准?
BMJ. 1999 Nov 27;319(7222):1426-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7222.1426.
4
Drug rationing in the UK National Health Service. Current status and future prospects.英国国民医疗服务体系中的药物配给。现状与未来展望。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 Sep;12(3):339-50. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199712030-00006.
5
Reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Which strategy for which patient?
Drugs. 1998 Jul;56(1):31-48. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199856010-00004.
6
Ethical conflicts in home care. Patient autonomy and physician advocacy.家庭护理中的伦理冲突。患者自主权与医生的支持。
Can Fam Physician. 1997 Dec;43:2136-42.
7
Fundholding practice's draft policy on ethical use of resources. Policy is mechanism by which decisions might be reached.基金持有机构关于资源合理使用的政策草案。政策是达成决策的机制。
BMJ. 1996 Oct 5;313(7061):883. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7061.883a.
8
Fundholding practice's draft policy on ethical use of resources. Policy is inconsistent.基金持有机构关于资源合理使用的政策草案。该政策存在不一致之处。
BMJ. 1996 Oct 5;313(7061):883. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7061.883.
9
Rationing health care. Patients have strong input into purchasing decisions in Droitwich.医疗保健配给。在德罗伊特维奇,患者对购买决策有很大的影响力。
BMJ. 1996 Aug 31;313(7056):557-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7056.557c.
10
Rationing health care: moving the debate forward.医疗资源配给:推动辩论前行。
BMJ. 1996 Jun 22;312(7046):1553-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7046.1553.

阿斯伯里资源道德使用政策草案。

The Asbury draft policy on ethical use of resources.

作者信息

Crisp R, Hope T, Ebbs D

机构信息

St. Anne's College, University of Oxford.

出版信息

BMJ. 1996 Jun 15;312(7045):1528-31; discussion 1531-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7045.1528.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.312.7045.1528
PMID:8646149
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2351240/
Abstract

The general practice partners invited two medical ethicists (RC and TH) to meet them to develop the document. The partners met RC and TH for one and a half hours on eight occasions over one year and met without them on eight further occasions. The entire general practice also had an all day session to discuss in detail an advanced version of the draft. The developmental process was of great value to the partnership and has led to appreciable change in individuals' views. The draft policy presented here is intended to start the ball rolling, so that proper guidelines will be developed at whatever level in the NHS is most appropriate. Comments and feedback are welcomed.

摘要

全科医疗合作伙伴邀请了两位医学伦理学家(RC和TH)与他们会面以制定该文件。在一年的时间里,合作伙伴与RC和TH共会面八次,每次时长一个半小时,另外还单独会面了八次。整个全科医疗团队还举行了一整天的会议,详细讨论了该草案的高级版本。这个制定过程对合作伙伴关系非常有价值,并导致了个人观点的显著变化。这里提出的政策草案旨在开启讨论,以便在英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)最合适的任何层面制定出适当的指导方针。欢迎提出意见和反馈。