Rationing health care: moving the debate forward.
作者信息
Smith R
出版信息
BMJ. 1996 Jun 22;312(7046):1553-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7046.1553.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Rationing health care: moving the debate forward.医疗资源配给：推动辩论前行。
BMJ. 1996 Jun 22;312(7046):1553-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7046.1553.
2
The rationing debate. Rationing within the NHS should be explicit. The case for.配给制辩论。国民医疗服务体系内的配给制应该是明确的。支持的理由。
BMJ. 1997 Apr 12;314(7087):1114-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7087.1114.
3
Priority setting in purchasing.采购中的优先级设定。
Br J Hosp Med. 1993;49(3):200-2.
4
The rationing debate. Rationing health care by age.配给制辩论。按年龄配给医疗保健服务。
BMJ. 1997 Mar 15;314(7083):820-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7083.820.
5
The rationing agenda in the NHS. Rationing Agenda Group.英国国家医疗服务体系中的配给议程。配给议程小组。
BMJ. 1996 Jun 22;312(7046):1593-601. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7046.1593.
6
Rationing intensive care.重症监护资源分配
BMJ. 1995 Mar 18;310(6981):682-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6981.682.
7
The rationing debate. Central government should have a greater role in rationing decisions. The case for.配给制辩论。中央政府在配给决策中应发挥更大作用。支持理由。
BMJ. 1997 Mar 29;314(7085):967-70. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7085.967.
8
Rationing health care.医疗保健配给
BMJ. 1998 Feb 7;316(7129):410. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7129.410.
9
Health care rationing and the courts.医疗保健配给与法院。
Health Care Anal. 1993 Nov;1(2):170-3. doi: 10.1007/BF02197113.
10
The Child B case -- reflections of a chief executive.儿童B案件——一位首席执行官的反思
BMJ. 1997 Jun 21;314(7097):1838-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7097.1838a.
引用本文的文献
1
2
Drug rationing in the UK National Health Service. Current status and future prospects.英国国民医疗服务体系中的药物配给。现状与未来展望。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 Sep;12(3):339-50. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199712030-00006.
3
Assessing priorities for allocation of donor liver grafts: survey of public and clinicians.评估供体肝脏移植分配的优先事项：公众与临床医生调查
BMJ. 1998 Jul 18;317(7152):172-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7152.172.
4
Rationing health care. Degree of rationing in Zaire would be unacceptable in Britain.医疗保健配给。扎伊尔的配给程度在英国是不可接受的。
BMJ. 1996 Aug 31;313(7056):558. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7056.558a.
5
Rationing health care. Patients have strong input into purchasing decisions in Droitwich.医疗保健配给。在德罗伊特维奇，患者对购买决策有很大的影响力。
BMJ. 1996 Aug 31;313(7056):557-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7056.557c.
6
Rationing health care. Anti-Rationing Group also wants to contribute to the debate.医疗保健配给。反配给组织也希望为这场辩论做出贡献。
BMJ. 1996 Aug 31;313(7056):557. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7056.557b.
7
Rationing health care. Britain could still have a comprehensive NHS without rationing.医疗保健配给。英国仍然可以拥有一个无需配给的全面的国民医疗服务体系。
BMJ. 1996 Aug 31;313(7056):557. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7056.557a.
8
Rationing health care. Politicians do not want to duck the issues.医疗资源配给。政治家们不想回避这些问题。
BMJ. 1996 Aug 31;313(7056):557. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7056.557.
本文引用的文献
1
Fetal tissue may be used for research not infertility treatment.胎儿组织可用于研究，而非不孕治疗。
BMJ. 1994 Jul 16;309(6948):200. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6948.200.
2
The rationing agenda in the NHS. Rationing Agenda Group.英国国家医疗服务体系中的配给议程。配给议程小组。
BMJ. 1996 Jun 22;312(7046):1593-601. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7046.1593.
3
Setting priorities: is there a role for citizens' juries?确定优先事项：公民陪审团能发挥作用吗？
BMJ. 1996 Jun 22;312(7046):1591-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7046.1591.
4
Media coverage of the Child B case.媒体对儿童B案件的报道。
BMJ. 1996 Jun 22;312(7046):1587-91. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7046.1587.
5
The Asbury draft policy on ethical use of resources.阿斯伯里资源道德使用政策草案。
BMJ. 1996 Jun 15;312(7045):1528-31; discussion 1531-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7045.1528.
6
What can be concluded from the Oxcheck and British family heart studies: commentary on cost effectiveness analyses.从Oxcheck研究和英国家庭心脏研究中可以得出什么结论：对成本效益分析的评论
BMJ. 1996 May 18;312(7041):1274-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7041.1274.
7
Setting priorities, can Britain learn from Sweden?确定优先事项，英国能向瑞典学习吗？
BMJ. 1996 Mar 16;312(7032):691-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7032.691.
8
Health care rationing: the public's debate.医疗保健资源分配：公众的辩论。
BMJ. 1996 Mar 16;312(7032):670-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7032.670.
9
Patients' views of priority setting in health care: an interview survey in one practice.患者对医疗保健中优先次序设定的看法：一项针对一家医疗机构的访谈调查
BMJ. 1995 Oct 28;311(7013):1137-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7013.1137.
10
Priorities and rationing: pragmatism or principles?优先事项与资源分配：实用主义还是原则？
BMJ. 1995 Sep 23;311(7008):761-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7008.761.
Zotero 插件