Khoo S K, Daunter B, Mackay E
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1979 Mar-Apr;16(5):388-93. doi: 10.1002/j.1879-3479.1979.tb00471.x.
A comparative study of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and beta 2-microglobulin (beta 2-MG) in serum was made by radioimmunoassay in 77 women with genital cancer. With a positive level defined as 5 ng of CEA/ml and 3.0 microgram of beta 2-MG/ml, CEA was positive in 31% of the women with cancer of the corpus, 36% of those with cancer of the cervix and 36% of those with cancer of the ovary the corresponding figures for beta 2-MG were 6%, 27% and 56%, respectively. The additional use of beta 2-MG provided an increase in positive results, especially in cases of cancer of the ovary. A direct relationship between the extent of tumor and serum marker level was more evident for beta 2-MG than CEA. There was no correlation between serial levels of CEA and beta 2-MG in most patients. CEA levels appeared to predict subsequent tumor behavior more accurately in patients with good prognoses (ie, complete or partial tumor response), whereas beta 2-MG levels gave the same prediction in those with bad prognoses (ie, nonresponsive or progressive tumor).
采用放射免疫分析法对77例妇科癌症患者血清中的癌胚抗原(CEA)和β2-微球蛋白(β2-MG)进行了对比研究。将CEA阳性水平定义为5 ng/ml,β2-MG阳性水平定义为3.0 μg/ml,结果显示,子宫体癌患者中31%的CEA呈阳性,宫颈癌患者中36%的CEA呈阳性,卵巢癌患者中36%的CEA呈阳性;而β2-MG的相应阳性率分别为6%、27%和56%。β2-MG的额外检测提高了阳性结果的检出率,尤其是在卵巢癌病例中。肿瘤范围与血清标志物水平之间的直接关系在β2-MG中比在CEA中更为明显。在大多数患者中,CEA和β2-MG的连续水平之间没有相关性。在预后良好(即肿瘤完全或部分缓解)的患者中,CEA水平似乎能更准确地预测后续肿瘤行为,而在预后不良(即无反应或肿瘤进展)的患者中,β2-MG水平能给出相同的预测。