Nagueh S F, Kopelen H A, Zoghbi W A
Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, TX 77030, USA.
Circulation. 1996 Mar 15;93(6):1160-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.93.6.1160.
A paucity of data exists as to the relation of mean right atrial pressure (RAP) to Doppler parameters of right atrial and ventricular filling. Furthermore, whether echocardiographic parameters of right atrial and right ventricular function and inferior vena cava improve the relation of Doppler filling dynamics with RAP has not been explored.
Doppler and echocardiographic studies were performed simultaneously with measurements of mean RAP in consecutive patients who either had a central venous catheter in the Intensive Care Unit or underwent catheterization of the right side of the heart. The initial population consisted of 35 patients with a mean age (+/-SD) of 60+/-15 years; 34% were on mechanical ventilation. Mean RAP averaged 9+/-5.7 mm Hg (range, 2 to 28 mm Hg). Among tricuspid inflow parameters, the strongest relation with RAP was observed with the ratio of early to late velocity (r=.66). For hepatic venous flow, systolic filling wave indexes had the best relation with atrial pressure, the highest being for systolic filling fraction (r=-.86). Weaker relations were noted with the use of right atrial volumes, right ventricular function, and inferior vena caval diameters. The addition of any of these variables did not improve the relation of systolic filling fraction with RAP. The regression equation (RAP=21.6-24 systolic filling fraction) was tested prospectively in the estimation of atrial pressure 50 patients. The correlation coefficient was .89 in the prospective group and .88 in the total group of 85 patients. The mean difference between predicted and actual pressures in the whole population was -0.2+/-2.6 mm Hg. The sensitivity and specificity for mean RAP>8 mm Hg were 86% and 92%, respectively.
Among echocardiographic and Doppler parameters of right atrial and right ventricular function, hepatic venous flow dynamics relate best to mean atrial pressure and can be used clinically to estimate mean RAP.
关于平均右心房压力(RAP)与右心房和心室充盈的多普勒参数之间的关系,现有数据较少。此外,右心房和右心室功能以及下腔静脉的超声心动图参数是否能改善多普勒充盈动力学与RAP之间的关系尚未得到探讨。
在重症监护病房留置中心静脉导管或接受心脏右侧导管插入术的连续患者中,同时进行了多普勒和超声心动图研究,并测量了平均RAP。初始人群包括35例患者,平均年龄(±标准差)为60±15岁;34%接受机械通气。平均RAP平均为9±5.7 mmHg(范围为2至28 mmHg)。在三尖瓣流入参数中,观察到与RAP关系最密切的是早期与晚期速度之比(r = 0.66)。对于肝静脉血流,收缩期充盈波指数与心房压力关系最佳,其中收缩期充盈分数最高(r = -0.86)。使用右心房容积、右心室功能和下腔静脉直径时,关系较弱。添加这些变量中的任何一个都没有改善收缩期充盈分数与RAP之间的关系。回归方程(RAP = 21.6 - 24×收缩期充盈分数)在前瞻性评估50例患者的心房压力时进行了测试。前瞻性组的相关系数为0.89,85例患者的总组为0.88。整个人群中预测压力与实际压力的平均差异为-0.2±2.6 mmHg。平均RAP>8 mmHg的敏感性和特异性分别为86%和92%。
在右心房和右心室功能的超声心动图和多普勒参数中,肝静脉血流动力学与平均心房压力关系最为密切,可在临床上用于估计平均RAP。