Kido S, Ikezoe J, Kondoh H, Takeuchi N, Johkoh T, Kohno N, Tomiyama N, Naito H, Arisawa J, Nakamura H
Department of Radiology, Osaka University Medical School, Japan.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Jul;167(1):111-5. doi: 10.2214/ajr.167.1.8659352.
To determine acceptable compression ratios for digital radiography, we evaluated the effect of data compression on the detection of subtle interstitial lung abnormalities using digitized chest radiographs.
Screen-film chest radiographs of 38 patients with subtle interstitial lung abnormalities and 40 patients with normal lung parenchyma were digitized (spatial resolution, 0.175 mm; 2000 x 2000 pixels; 10 bits per pixel) and compressed with the discrete cosine transform method at ratios of 10:1, 20:1, and 30:1. Five chest radiologists and five radiology residents examined the uncompressed and compressed digital images and rates the presence of interstitial lung abnormalities with a five-level scale of confidence. Results were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic methods.
Overall, the interpretation of images with a compression ratio of 30:1 was significantly less accurate than that of uncompressed images (p < .05). For the five chest radiologists, interpretation of images with a compression ratio of 20:1 or 30:1 was significantly less accurate than that of uncompressed images (p < .05). However, for the five residents, no significant difference between interpretations of compressed and uncompressed images was noted (p > or = .05).
These results suggest that a 10:1 data compression ratio does not influence the detection of subtle interstitial lung abnormalities. However, information that is lost with a 20:1 data compression ratio might be essential for interpretation by experienced chest radiologists.
为确定数字放射成像可接受的压缩比,我们使用数字化胸部X光片评估了数据压缩对细微间质性肺异常检测的影响。
对38例有细微间质性肺异常的患者和40例肺实质正常的患者的屏-片胸部X光片进行数字化处理(空间分辨率为0.175毫米;2000×2000像素;每像素10比特),并采用离散余弦变换方法以10:1、20:1和30:1的比例进行压缩。五名胸部放射科医生和五名放射科住院医师检查了未压缩和压缩后的数字图像,并使用五级置信度量表对间质性肺异常的存在情况进行评分。结果采用接受者操作特征方法进行分析。
总体而言,压缩比为30:1的图像解读准确性明显低于未压缩图像(p < 0.05)。对于五名胸部放射科医生来说,压缩比为20:1或30:1的图像解读准确性明显低于未压缩图像(p < 0.05)。然而,对于五名住院医师来说,压缩图像和未压缩图像的解读之间没有显著差异(p≥0.05)。
这些结果表明,10:1的数据压缩比不会影响细微间质性肺异常的检测。然而,20:1的数据压缩比所丢失的信息可能对经验丰富的胸部放射科医生的解读至关重要。