• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实践指南。内科医生在寻找什么?

Practice guidelines. What are internists looking for?

作者信息

Hayward R S, Wilson M C, Tunis S R, Guyatt G H, Moore K A, Bass E B

机构信息

Department of Medicine, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 1996 Mar;11(3):176-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02600272.

DOI:10.1007/BF02600272
PMID:8667096
Abstract

To determine features of the presentation of clinical practice guidelines that may enhance their use by internists, we conducted a cross-sectional survey to which 1,513 (60%) of 2,513 eligible internists responded. Endorsements by respected colleagues and by major organizations were identified as very important by 72% and 69% of respondents, respectively. Respondents preferred short pamphlets and manuals summarizing a number of guidelines and felt that concise recommendations (86%), synopsis of supporting evidence (85%), and quantification of benefit (77%) were important in guideline presentation. We conclude that guideline developers should gain the endorsement of major organizations and present key aspects in brief, easily assimilated formats.

摘要

为确定可能提高内科医生对临床实践指南使用率的指南呈现特征,我们开展了一项横断面调查,2513名符合条件的内科医生中有1513人(60%)回复了调查。分别有72%和69%的受访者认为,受尊敬同事的认可和主要组织的认可非常重要。受访者更喜欢总结若干指南的简短手册,并认为在指南呈现中,简明的推荐意见(86%)、支持证据的概要(85%)以及获益的量化(77%)很重要。我们得出结论,指南制定者应获得主要组织的认可,并以简短、易于理解的形式呈现关键内容。

相似文献

1
Practice guidelines. What are internists looking for?实践指南。内科医生在寻找什么?
J Gen Intern Med. 1996 Mar;11(3):176-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02600272.
2
Internists' evaluation of guidelines: the IMCARE Practice Guidelines Network.内科医生对指南的评估:IMCARE实践指南网络
Int J Qual Health Care. 1995 Mar;7(1):31-7. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/7.1.31.
3
Canadian physicians' attitudes about and preferences regarding clinical practice guidelines.加拿大医生对临床实践指南的态度及偏好。
CMAJ. 1997 Jun 15;156(12):1715-23.
4
Internists' attitudes about clinical practice guidelines.内科医生对临床实践指南的态度。
Ann Intern Med. 1994 Jun 1;120(11):956-63. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-120-11-199406010-00008.
5
Why is it that internists do not follow guidelines for preventing intravascular catheter infections?为什么内科医生不遵循预防血管内导管感染的指南呢?
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2005 Jun;26(6):525-33. doi: 10.1086/502579.
6
Differences among primary care physicians' adherence to 2009 ACOG guidelines for cervical cancer screening.初级保健医生对 2009 年美国妇产科医师学会宫颈癌筛查指南的依从性存在差异。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014 May;23(5):397-403. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4475. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
7
Cancer screening guideline preference surveys: physicians' perceptions of the American Cancer Society.癌症筛查指南偏好调查:医生对美国癌症协会的看法
Tenn Med. 1998 Jan;91(1):17-20.
8
US internists' awareness and use of overtreatment guidelines: a national survey.美国内科医生对过度治疗指南的认知和使用情况:一项全国性调查。
Am J Manag Care. 2017 Jul;23(7):420-427.
9
Are nonspecific practice guidelines potentially harmful? A randomized comparison of the effect of nonspecific versus specific guidelines on physician decision making.非特异性实践指南是否有潜在危害?非特异性指南与特异性指南对医生决策影响的随机对照比较。
Health Serv Res. 2000 Mar;34(7):1429-48.
10
Use and perceptions of clinical practice guidelines by internal medicine physicians.内科医生对临床实践指南的使用与认知
Am J Med Qual. 2007 May-Jun;22(3):170-6. doi: 10.1177/1062860607300291.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for long-term breast cancer survivorship: assessment of quality and evidence-based recommendations.乳腺癌长期生存临床实践指南的系统评价:质量评估与循证推荐
Br J Cancer. 2025 May 17. doi: 10.1038/s41416-025-03059-5.
2
Addressing barriers to evidence-based medicine in pediatric surgery: an introduction to the Canadian Association of Paediatric Surgeons Evidence-Based Resource.解决小儿外科循证医学的障碍:加拿大小儿外科医生协会循证资源介绍
World J Pediatr Surg. 2022 Jan 5;5(1):e000332. doi: 10.1136/wjps-2021-000332. eCollection 2022.
3
The quality of guidelines in pediatric surgery: can we all AGREE?

本文引用的文献

1
Practice guidelines and reminders to reduce duration of hospital stay for patients with chest pain. An interventional trial.减少胸痛患者住院时间的实践指南及提醒。一项干预性试验。
Ann Intern Med. 1994 Feb 15;120(4):257-63. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-120-4-199402150-00001.
2
Internists' attitudes about clinical practice guidelines.内科医生对临床实践指南的态度。
Ann Intern Med. 1994 Jun 1;120(11):956-63. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-120-11-199406010-00008.
3
Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations.
小儿外科指南的质量:我们能达成共识吗?
Pediatr Surg Int. 2015 Jan;31(1):61-8. doi: 10.1007/s00383-014-3623-6. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
4
"Even if you know everything you can forget": health worker perceptions of mobile phone text-messaging to improve malaria case-management in Kenya.“即便你无所不知,也可能遗忘”:肯尼亚卫生工作者对手机短信用于改善疟疾病例管理的看法。
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038636. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
5
Multiple clinical practice guidelines for breast and cervical cancer screening: perceptions of US primary care physicians.多项乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查临床实践指南:美国初级保健医生的看法。
Med Care. 2011 Feb;49(2):139-48. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318202858e.
6
Attitudes toward practice guidelines among intensive care unit personnel: a cross-sectional anonymous survey.重症监护病房人员对实践指南的态度:一项横断面匿名调查。
Heart Lung. 2007 Jul-Aug;36(4):287-97. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2006.08.005.
7
Research-based-decision-making in Canadian health organizations: a behavioural approach.加拿大卫生组织基于研究的决策制定:一种行为学方法。
J Med Syst. 2007 Jun;31(3):185-96. doi: 10.1007/s10916-007-9054-3.
8
Barriers to optimal antibiotic use for community-acquired pneumonia at hospitals: a qualitative study.医院社区获得性肺炎最佳抗生素使用的障碍:一项定性研究
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Apr;16(2):143-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.017327.
9
Management of dementia by family physicians in academic settings.学术环境下家庭医生对痴呆症的管理。
Can Fam Physician. 2006 Sep;52(9):1108-9.
10
A randomized trial to assess the impact of opinion leader endorsed evidence summaries on the use of secondary prevention strategies in patients with coronary artery disease: the ESP-CAD trial protocol [NCT00175240].一项评估意见领袖认可的证据摘要对冠心病患者二级预防策略使用影响的随机试验:ESP-CAD 试验方案 [NCT00175240]。
Implement Sci. 2006 May 6;1:11. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-1-11.
临床指南对医疗实践的影响:严格评估的系统评价
Lancet. 1993 Nov 27;342(8883):1317-22. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92244-n.
4
The periodic health examination: comparison of recommendations and internists' performance.定期健康检查:建议与内科医生表现的比较。
South Med J. 1981 Mar;74(3):265-71. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198103000-00004.
5
The impact of reading on physicians' nonadherence to recommended standards of medical care.阅读对医生不遵守推荐医疗标准的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 1985;21(8):909-14. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(85)90147-9.
6
Effects of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Program on physician practice.美国国立卫生研究院共识发展项目对医生临床实践的影响。
JAMA. 1987 Nov 20;258(19):2708-13.
7
A taxonomy and critical review of tested strategies for the application of clinical practice recommendations: from "official" to "individual" clinical policy.
Am J Prev Med. 1988;4(4 Suppl):77-94; discussion 95-7.
8
Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians.实践指南能指导实践吗?一项共识声明对医生实践的影响。
N Engl J Med. 1989 Nov 9;321(19):1306-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198911093211906.
9
Patterns of physicians' treatments for referral patients from public cholesterol screening.医生对来自公共胆固醇筛查转诊患者的治疗模式。
Am J Prev Med. 1991 Sep-Oct;7(5):273-9.
10
Evidence for the effectiveness of CME. A review of 50 randomized controlled trials.继续医学教育有效性的证据。对50项随机对照试验的综述。
JAMA. 1992 Sep 2;268(9):1111-7.