Comparison of the polyethylene glycol antiglobulin test and the use of enzymes in antibody detection and identification.

BACKGROUND

The polyethylene glycol indirect antiglobulin test for detection of red cell antibodies was compared with a proven, highly sensitive test system using papain.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Parallel, prospective testing of 1508 samples with polyethylene glycol and with albumin and papain evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of polyethylene glycol. Retrospective analysis of antibody specificities was performed for the 2 years before and the 2 years after the institution of polyethylene glycol testing.

RESULTS

Of 1508 prospective screens, 53 (3.5%) had discordant results: 5 were positive only in polyethylene glycol and 48 were positive only in albumin and papain. Upon antibody identification, the 5 samples that were positive only in polyethylene glycol showed 1 anti-D, 2 warm autoantibodies, and 2 false-positive results. The 48 samples that were positive only in albumin and papain showed 1 each of the following: anti-Le(b); anti-P1; anti-S; high-titer, low-avidity antibody; and cold autoantibody; there were 43 false-positive results. False-positive results totaled 12 (0.8%) with polyethylene glycol and 53 (3.5%) with albumin and papain. The retrospective analysis of antibody specificity with polyethylene glycol showed a significant increase in the detection of Fy(a) and/or Fy(b) (p < 0.0002) and Jk(b) (p < 0.0002) antibodies and a decrease in the detection of Le(a) and/or Le(b) antibodies (p < 0.0002).

CONCLUSION

Polyethylene glycol retained the high sensitivity of the albumin and papain, while significantly lowering the number of false-positive results and decreasing the detection of antibodies of doubtful clinical significance.