• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮扩张气管切开术:恰利亚法与波特克斯[拉皮特拉奇的修正]法对比

Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy: the Ciaglia method versus the Portex [correction of Rapitrach] method.

作者信息

Ambesh S P, Kaushik S

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Sanjay Gandhi Post-Graduate Institute of Medical Science, Lucknow, India.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 1998 Sep;87(3):556-61. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199809000-00010.

DOI:10.1097/00000539-199809000-00010
PMID:9728827
Abstract

UNLABELLED

In a prospective study, we performed percutaneous dilational tracheostomy (PDT) using either the Ciaglia method (gradual dilation) or the Portex [corrected] method (single dilation) in 80 patients. We encountered difficulty in dilating the tracheal stoma of three (7.5%) patients in the Ciaglia group because of tight pretracheal fascia. It was difficult to insert the tracheostomy tube in four (10%) patients in the Portex [corrected] group even after appropriate tracheal dilation. However, the tracheal cannulation was successfully completed in all patients in subsequent attempts. The mean time for completion of the procedures, from skin incision to insertion of the tracheostomy tube, was 14+/-5.5 min with the Ciaglia method and 6.5+/-3.5 min with the Portex [corrected] method. PDT with either method has not been associated with clinically significant hemorrhage, infection at the stoma site, or cosmetic deformity. In a follow-up period of 9 mo, none of our decannulated patients presented with clinical tracheal stenosis. Our results indicate that PDT with both methods is as safe and easy to organize and perform as a bedside procedure, obviating the need to transport critically ill patients from the critical care unit.

IMPLICATIONS

The tracheas of 80 patients were cannulated through an artificial opening using either the Ciaglia (gradual dilation) or the Portex [corrected] (single dilation) method. Both techniques were successful with no significant complications. After 9 mo of closure of this opening, none of the survivors had significant scarring or narrowing of the trachea.

摘要

未标注

在一项前瞻性研究中,我们对80例患者采用Ciaglia法(逐步扩张)或Portex法(单次扩张)进行经皮扩张气管切开术(PDT)。在Ciaglia组中,由于气管前筋膜紧张,我们在扩张3例(7.5%)患者的气管造口时遇到困难。在Portex组中,即使进行了适当的气管扩张,仍有4例(10%)患者难以插入气管切开管。然而,在随后的尝试中,所有患者均成功完成气管插管。从皮肤切口到插入气管切开管,Ciaglia法完成手术的平均时间为14±5.5分钟,Portex法为6.5±3.5分钟。两种方法的PDT均未出现具有临床意义的出血、造口部位感染或美容畸形。在9个月的随访期内,我们所有拔管患者均未出现临床气管狭窄。我们的结果表明,两种方法的PDT作为床边操作同样安全且易于组织实施,无需将重症患者从重症监护病房转运。

启示

80例患者的气管通过人工开口采用Ciaglia法(逐步扩张)或Portex法(单次扩张)进行插管。两种技术均成功且无明显并发症。在该开口闭合9个月后,所有存活者均未出现明显瘢痕或气管狭窄。

相似文献

1
Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy: the Ciaglia method versus the Portex [correction of Rapitrach] method.经皮扩张气管切开术:恰利亚法与波特克斯[拉皮特拉奇的修正]法对比
Anesth Analg. 1998 Sep;87(3):556-61. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199809000-00010.
2
Percutaneous tracheostomy with single dilatation technique: a prospective, randomized comparison of Ciaglia blue rhino versus Griggs' guidewire dilating forceps.单扩张技术经皮气管切开术:Ciaglia蓝犀牛套件与Griggs导丝扩张钳的前瞻性随机对照研究
Anesth Analg. 2002 Dec;95(6):1739-45, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200212000-00050.
3
Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy--a clinical study evaluating two systems.经皮扩张气管切开术——一项评估两种系统的临床研究
Anaesth Intensive Care. 1996 Feb;24(1):56-9. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9602400110.
4
Percutaneous tracheostomy: ciaglia blue rhino versus the basic ciaglia technique of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy.经皮气管切开术:Ciaglia Blue Rhino与经皮扩张气管切开术的基本Ciaglia技术对比
Anesth Analg. 2000 Oct;91(4):882-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200010000-00021.
5
Bedside percutaneous dilational tracheostomy with endoscopic guidance: experience with 71 ICU patients.内镜引导下床边经皮扩张气管切开术:71例重症监护病房患者的经验
Intensive Care Med. 1994 Aug;20(7):476-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01711898.
6
[Early and long-term results of percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy (PDT Ciaglia) in 195 intensive care patients].[195例重症监护患者经皮扩张气管切开术(Ciaglia法)的早期及长期结果]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 1998 May;33(5):306-12. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-994254.
7
Late complications of percutaneous tracheostomy using the balloon dilation technique.经皮气管造口术球囊扩张技术的晚期并发症
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2018 Apr;42(3):151-158. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
8
Laryngotracheal injury after percutaneous dilational tracheostomy in cadaver specimens.尸体标本经皮扩张气管切开术后的喉气管损伤
Laryngoscope. 2003 Jan;113(1):16-20. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200301000-00003.
9
A simple modification of Ciaglia Blue Rhino technique for tracheostomy: using a guidewire dilating forceps for initial dilation.一种用于气管切开术的改良Ciaglia Blue Rhino技术:使用导丝扩张钳进行初始扩张。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Jan;31(1):114-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.10.006. Epub 2006 Oct 25.
10
[Percutaneous tracheostomy through dilatation with the Ciaglia Blue Dolphin(®) method].经皮扩张气管切开术(使用Ciaglia蓝海豚(®)方法)
Med Intensiva. 2015 Mar;39(2):76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2013.12.002. Epub 2014 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of two percutaneous tracheostomy techniques, guide wire dilating forceps and Ciaglia Blue Rhino: a sequential cohort study.两种经皮气管切开术技术(导丝扩张钳法和Ciaglia Blue Rhino法)的比较:一项序贯队列研究
Crit Care. 2004 Oct;8(5):R299-305. doi: 10.1186/cc2907. Epub 2004 Jul 5.
2
Experience with two different techniques of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy in 54 neurosurgical patients.54例神经外科患者采用两种不同经皮扩张气管切开术技术的经验。
Neurosurg Rev. 2003 Jul;26(3):188-91. doi: 10.1007/s10143-002-0248-3. Epub 2003 Feb 1.
3
Percutaneous tracheostomy: comparison of Ciaglia and Griggs techniques.
经皮气管切开术:Ciaglia技术与Griggs技术的比较
Crit Care. 2000;4(2):124-8. doi: 10.1186/cc667. Epub 2000 Mar 3.