• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

柳氮磺胺吡啶治疗银屑病关节炎:一项随机、多中心、安慰剂对照研究。

Sulphasalazine in psoriatic arthritis: a randomized, multicentre, placebo-controlled study.

作者信息

Combe B, Goupille P, Kuntz J L, Tebib J, Lioté F, Bregeon C

机构信息

Hôpital Lapeyronie, CHU Montpellier-Nîmes, France.

出版信息

Br J Rheumatol. 1996 Jul;35(7):664-8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/35.7.664.

DOI:10.1093/rheumatology/35.7.664
PMID:8670601
Abstract

A prospective double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study of 24 weeks duration was carried out comparing the efficacy and tolerability of sulphasalazine (SSZ) versus placebo in patients with psoriatic arthritis. A total of 120 patients were included in nine centres. All patients had active disease and fulfilled the criteria of definite psoriatic arthritis of at least 3 months duration. They received either SSZ (2.0 g/day) or placebo. Efficacy variables included pain, patient's overall assessment of joint and skin improvement, morning stiffness, Ritchie articular index, ESR and CRP. An intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was performed for the 117 patients who qualified (three patients did not qualify due to missing data after baseline). A per-protocol analysis was performed for the 81 patients who completed the 6 months study period (SSZ = 38, placebo = 43). Major reasons for withdrawal were inadequate response (SSZ = 4, placebo = 7) and adverse events (SSZ = 8, placebo = 12). Pain was the only statistically significantly different primary outcome variable at end point in favour of SSZ in the ITT analysis. No significant differences were present in other clinical or biological variables, although there was a trend in favour of SSZ for some variables. SSZ, at a dose of 2.0 g/day, appeared to be a safe treatment in patients with psoriatic arthritis. At this dosage, its efficacy was only demonstrated for the pain variable.

摘要

开展了一项为期24周的前瞻性双盲、安慰剂对照、随机研究,比较柳氮磺胺吡啶(SSZ)与安慰剂对银屑病关节炎患者的疗效和耐受性。九个中心共纳入120例患者。所有患者均患有活动性疾病,符合病程至少3个月的明确银屑病关节炎标准。他们接受SSZ(2.0克/天)或安慰剂治疗。疗效变量包括疼痛、患者对关节和皮肤改善的总体评估、晨僵、里奇关节指数、血沉(ESR)和C反应蛋白(CRP)。对符合条件的117例患者进行了意向性治疗(ITT)分析(3例患者因基线后数据缺失而不符合条件)。对完成6个月研究期的81例患者进行了符合方案分析(SSZ = 38例,安慰剂 = 43例)。退出的主要原因是反应不足(SSZ = 4例,安慰剂 = 7例)和不良事件(SSZ = 8例,安慰剂 = 12例)。在ITT分析中,疼痛是终点时唯一在统计学上有显著差异的主要结局变量,有利于SSZ。其他临床或生物学变量无显著差异,尽管某些变量有有利于SSZ的趋势。2.0克/天剂量的SSZ对银屑病关节炎患者似乎是一种安全的治疗方法。在此剂量下,其疗效仅在疼痛变量上得到证实。

相似文献

1
Sulphasalazine in psoriatic arthritis: a randomized, multicentre, placebo-controlled study.柳氮磺胺吡啶治疗银屑病关节炎:一项随机、多中心、安慰剂对照研究。
Br J Rheumatol. 1996 Jul;35(7):664-8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/35.7.664.
2
Sulfasalazine in the treatment of spondylarthropathy. A randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.柳氮磺胺吡啶治疗脊柱关节病。一项随机、多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Arthritis Rheum. 1995 May;38(5):618-27. doi: 10.1002/art.1780380507.
3
Comparison of sulfasalazine and placebo for the treatment of axial and peripheral articular manifestations of the seronegative spondylarthropathies: a Department of Veterans Affairs cooperative study.柳氮磺胺吡啶与安慰剂治疗血清阴性脊柱关节病的轴向和外周关节表现的比较:美国退伍军人事务部合作研究
Arthritis Rheum. 1999 Nov;42(11):2325-9. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199911)42:11<2325::AID-ANR10>3.0.CO;2-C.
4
Comparison of sulfasalazine and placebo in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. A Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study.柳氮磺胺吡啶与安慰剂治疗银屑病关节炎的比较。一项退伍军人事务部合作研究。
Arthritis Rheum. 1996 Dec;39(12):2013-20. doi: 10.1002/art.1780391210.
5
Sulfasalazine in the treatment of juvenile chronic arthritis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. Dutch Juvenile Chronic Arthritis Study Group.柳氮磺胺吡啶治疗青少年慢性关节炎:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心研究。荷兰青少年慢性关节炎研究组
Arthritis Rheum. 1998 May;41(5):808-16. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199805)41:5<808::AID-ART6>3.0.CO;2-T.
6
A comparison of cyclosporine, sulfasalazine, and symptomatic therapy in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis.环孢素、柳氮磺胺吡啶及对症治疗在银屑病关节炎治疗中的比较。
J Rheumatol. 2001 Oct;28(10):2274-82.
7
Sulfasalazine for ankylosing spondylitis.柳氮磺胺吡啶用于治疗强直性脊柱炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18(2):CD004800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004800.pub2.
8
Comparison of sulfasalazine and placebo in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. A Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study.柳氮磺胺吡啶与安慰剂治疗强直性脊柱炎的比较。一项退伍军人事务部合作研究。
Arthritis Rheum. 1996 Dec;39(12):2004-12. doi: 10.1002/art.1780391209.
9
Sulphasalazine in the management of psoriatic arthritis.
Br J Rheumatol. 1993 Oct;32(10):923-5. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/32.10.923.
10
A randomized double-blind controlled trial of sulphasalazine combined with pulses of methylprednisolone or placebo in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.
Br J Rheumatol. 1996 Feb;35(2):150-4. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/35.2.150.

引用本文的文献

1
Conventional Synthetic Disease-Modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs for Psoriatic Arthritis: Findings and Implications From a Patient Centered Longitudinal Study in Brazil.用于银屑病关节炎的传统合成改善病情抗风湿药:巴西一项以患者为中心的纵向研究的结果与启示
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Apr 26;13:878972. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.878972. eCollection 2022.
2
Brazilian Society of Rheumatology 2020 guidelines for psoriatic arthritis.巴西风湿病学会 2020 年银屑病关节炎治疗指南。
Adv Rheumatol. 2021 Nov 24;61(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s42358-021-00219-y.
3
Management of particular clinical situations in psoriatic arthritis: an expert's recommendation document based on systematic literature review and extended Delphi process.
特定临床情况下的银屑病关节炎管理:基于系统文献回顾和扩展 Delphi 流程的专家推荐文件。
Rheumatol Int. 2021 Sep;41(9):1549-1565. doi: 10.1007/s00296-021-04877-5. Epub 2021 May 2.
4
What does evidence-based medicine tell us about treatments for different subtypes of psoriatic arthritis? A systematic literature review on randomized controlled trials.循证医学对银屑病关节炎不同亚型的治疗有何见解?一项关于随机对照试验的系统文献综述。
Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2018 Jan 8;2(1):rkx019. doi: 10.1093/rap/rkx019. eCollection 2018.
5
Late-Onset and Elderly Psoriatic Arthritis: Clinical Aspects and Management.迟发性和老年银屑病关节炎:临床方面和管理。
Drugs Aging. 2019 Oct;36(10):909-925. doi: 10.1007/s40266-019-00688-3.
6
Special Article: 2018 American College of Rheumatology/National Psoriasis Foundation Guideline for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis.特稿:2018 年美国风湿病学会/国家银屑病基金会银屑病关节炎治疗指南。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019 Jan;71(1):2-29. doi: 10.1002/acr.23789. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
7
Special Article: 2018 American College of Rheumatology/National Psoriasis Foundation Guideline for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis.特稿:2018 年美国风湿病学会/国家银屑病基金会银屑病关节炎治疗指南。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Jan;71(1):5-32. doi: 10.1002/art.40726. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
8
Assessing the effectiveness of synthetic and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in psoriatic arthritis - a systematic review.评估合成及生物改善病情抗风湿药治疗银屑病关节炎的有效性——一项系统评价
Psoriasis (Auckl). 2015 May 12;5:71-81. doi: 10.2147/PTT.S52893. eCollection 2015.
9
Real-life experience of using conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Retrospective analysis of the efficacy of methotrexate, sulfasalazine, and leflunomide in PsA in comparison to spondyloarthritides other than PsA and literature review of the use of conventional DMARDs in PsA.在银屑病关节炎(PsA)中使用传统改善病情抗风湿药(DMARDs)的实际经验。回顾性分析甲氨蝶呤、柳氮磺胺吡啶和来氟米特在PsA中的疗效,并与除PsA之外的脊柱关节炎进行比较,同时对传统DMARDs在PsA中的应用进行文献综述。
Eur J Rheumatol. 2017 Mar;4(1):1-10. doi: 10.5152/eurjrheum.2017.1608. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
10
Managing patients with psoriatic disease: the diagnosis and pharmacologic treatment of psoriatic arthritis in patients with psoriasis.银屑病患者的管理:银屑病患者中银屑病关节炎的诊断和药物治疗。
Drugs. 2014 Mar;74(4):423-41. doi: 10.1007/s40265-014-0191-y.